These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3013909)

  • 41. A theory of measurement error and its implications for spatial and temporal gradient sensing during chemotaxis. II. The effects of non-equilibrated ligand binding.
    DeLisi C; Marchetti F
    Cell Biophys; 1983 Dec; 5(4):237-53. PubMed ID: 6202410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Stimulation of association curves and 'scatchard' plots of binding reactions where ligand and receptor are degraded or internalized.
    Beck JS; Goren HJ
    J Recept Res; 1983-1984; 3(6):745-72. PubMed ID: 6090658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. First passage and cooperativity of queuing kinetics.
    D'Orsogna MR; Chou T
    Phys Rev Lett; 2005 Oct; 95(17):170603. PubMed ID: 16383812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Rational design to control the trade-off between receptor affinity and cooperativity.
    Ortega G; Mariottini D; Troina A; Dahlquist FW; Ricci F; Plaxco KW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Aug; 117(32):19136-19140. PubMed ID: 32727893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of binding sites for wheat germ agglutinin on Raji lymphoblastoid cells and their isolated nuclei and plasma membranes.
    Jett M; Jamieson GA
    Biochemistry; 1981 Sep; 20(18):5221-6. PubMed ID: 7295673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Steric effects on multivalent ligand-receptor binding: exclusion of ligand sites by bound cell surface receptors.
    Hlavacek WS; Posner RG; Perelson AS
    Biophys J; 1999 Jun; 76(6):3031-43. PubMed ID: 10354429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Analysis of substrate competition in regulatory network motifs: Stimulus-response curves, thresholds and ultrasensitivity.
    Straube R
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Sep; 380():74-82. PubMed ID: 26002995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The unicellular Tetrahymena as a model cell for receptor research.
    Csaba G
    Int Rev Cytol; 1985; 95():327-77. PubMed ID: 2997070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cooperative binding isotherms for nearest neighbor interacting ligands on platonic solids: a simple model for viral capture nanotherapy.
    Siegel RA; Linstad JL
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Nov; 114(44):14071-6. PubMed ID: 20949931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Interpretation of Scatchard plots for aggregating receptor systems.
    Wofsy C; Goldstein B
    Math Biosci; 1992 Nov; 112(1):115-54. PubMed ID: 1330105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cooperative effects on binding of proteins to DNA.
    Nechipurenko YD; Gursky GV
    Biophys Chem; 1986 Aug; 24(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 3768466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [A new graphic method for determining the rate constant for affinity of a ligand for its receptor].
    Bobrovnik SA
    Ukr Biokhim Zh (1978); 1998; 70(6):144-6. PubMed ID: 10402664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A computerized approach towards the estimation of binding parameters to characterize cooperative and non-cooperative multicomponent ligand-receptor interactions.
    Quednau HD; Rao ML
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1985 Mar; 16(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 2995257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Properties and regulation of the T lymphocyte insulin receptor.
    Brown TJ; Ercolani L; Ginsberg BH
    J Recept Res; 1983; 3(4):481-94. PubMed ID: 6358488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of ligand diffusion on occupancy fluctuations of cell-surface receptors.
    Berezhkovskii AM; Szabo A
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Sep; 139(12):121910. PubMed ID: 24089722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Determination of binding parameters in the presence of coupled reactions.
    Beck JS; Goren HJ
    Cell Biophys; 1985 Mar; 7(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 2408754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A Receptor Model With Binding Affinity, Activation Efficacy, and Signal Amplification Parameters for Complex Fractional Response Versus Occupancy Data.
    Buchwald P
    Front Pharmacol; 2019; 10():605. PubMed ID: 31244653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Experimental artifacts and the analysis of ligand binding data: results of a computer simulation.
    Munson PJ
    J Recept Res; 1983; 3(1-2):249-59. PubMed ID: 6304302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Obligatory separation of hormone binding and biological response curves in systems dependent upon secondary mediators of hormone action.
    Strickland S; Loeb JN
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1981 Mar; 78(3):1366-70. PubMed ID: 6262790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Control and oscillation in ligand receptor interactions according to the law of mass action.
    Tallarida RJ
    Life Sci; 1990; 46(22):1559-68. PubMed ID: 2161974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.