226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30139339)
21. In vitro analysis of the fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia molar crowns with different occlusal thickness.
Sorrentino R; Triulzio C; Tricarico MG; Bonadeo G; Gherlone EF; Ferrari M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():328-333. PubMed ID: 27104931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Monolithic bridges with inCoris TZI and inCoris TZI C.
Wiedhahn K
Int J Comput Dent; 2015; 18(4):369-79. PubMed ID: 26734669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases.
Rosentritt M; Rembs A; Behr M; Hahnel S; Preis V
J Dent; 2015 Jul; 43(7):839-45. PubMed ID: 25953721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns and veneered zirconia crowns as a posterior implant restoration.
Kim JH; Lee SJ; Park JS; Ryu JJ
Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23296031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative fracture behavior of monolithic and veneered zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses.
Lopez-Suarez C; Rodriguez V; Pelaez J; Agustin-Panadero R; Suarez MJ
Dent Mater J; 2017 Nov; 36(6):816-821. PubMed ID: 28845035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of zirconia abutment preparation on the fracture strength of single implant lithium disilicate crowns after chewing simulation.
Mitsias M; Koutayas SO; Wolfart S; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 23106096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Retrospective clinical study of 1472-unit monolithic zirconia restorations with feather-edge margins realized with digital workflow.
Di Fiore A; Monaco C; Stellini E
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Nov; 27(11):6567-6575. PubMed ID: 37749286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fracture strength of lithium disilicate crowns compared to polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network and zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns.
Sieper K; Wille S; Kern M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():342-348. PubMed ID: 28662443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Load-Bearing Capacity of Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated with Different Connector Designs and Embrasure Shaping Methods.
Bakitian F; Seweryniak P; Papia E; Larsson C; Vult von Steyern P
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 30478870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Monolithic zirconia dental crowns. Internal fit, margin quality, fracture mode and load at fracture.
Schriwer C; Skjold A; Gjerdet NR; Øilo M
Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 28662859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years.
Lohbauer U; Reich S
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1165-1172. PubMed ID: 27277661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Load at fracture of monolithic and bilayered zirconia crowns with and without a cervical zirconia collar.
Øilo M; Kvam K; Gjerdet NR
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 26775244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Correlation of flexural strength of coupons versus strength of crowns fabricated with different zirconia materials with and without aging.
Alghazzawi TF; Janowski GM
J Am Dent Assoc; 2015 Dec; 146(12):904-912.e1. PubMed ID: 26610835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Correlations between fracture load of zirconia implant supported single crowns and mechanical properties of restorative material and cement.
Rohr N; Märtin S; Fischer J
Dent Mater J; 2018 Mar; 37(2):222-228. PubMed ID: 29176305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations.
Tang Z; Zhao X; Wang H; Liu B
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Oct; 98(40):e17385. PubMed ID: 31577743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reliability and aging behavior of three different zirconia grades used for monolithic four-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Spies BC; Zhang F; Wesemann C; Li M; Rosentritt M
Dent Mater; 2020 Nov; 36(11):e329-e339. PubMed ID: 32948330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
