230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30139642)
1. Aortic flow after valve sparing root replacement with or without neosinuses reconstruction.
Gaudino M; Piatti F; Lau C; Sturla F; Weinsaft JW; Weltert L; Votta E; Galea N; Chirichilli I; Di Franco A; Francone M; Catalano C; Redaelli A; Girardi LN; De Paulis R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Feb; 157(2):455-465. PubMed ID: 30139642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel insights by 4D Flow imaging on aortic flow physiology after valve-sparing root replacement with or without neosinuses.
Galea N; Piatti F; Sturla F; Weinsaft JW; Lau C; Chirichilli I; Carbone I; Votta E; Catalano C; De Paulis R; Girardi LN; Redaelli A; Gaudino M;
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Jun; 26(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 29401262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) reveals altered blood flow patterns in the ascending aorta of patients with valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
Oechtering TH; Sieren MM; Hunold P; Hennemuth A; Huellebrand M; Scharfschwerdt M; Richardt D; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Mar; 159(3):798-810.e1. PubMed ID: 31078313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) analysis of hemodynamics in valve-sparing aortic root repair with an anatomically shaped sinus prosthesis.
Oechtering TH; Hons CF; Sieren M; Hunold P; Hennemuth A; Huellebrand M; Drexl J; Scharfschwerdt M; Richardt D; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Aug; 152(2):418-427.e1. PubMed ID: 27423836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement alters ascending aortic blood flow and wall shear stress patterns: A 4D flow MRI comparison with age-matched, elderly controls.
Farag ES; Vendrik J; van Ooij P; Poortvliet QL; van Kesteren F; Wollersheim LW; Kaya A; Driessen AHG; Piek JJ; Koch KT; Baan J; Planken RN; Kluin J; Nederveen AJ; de Mol BAJM
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1444-1451. PubMed ID: 30132105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of aortic flow in healthy volunteers and patients after valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
Markl M; Draney MT; Miller DC; Levin JM; Williamson EE; Pelc NJ; Liang DH; Herfkens RJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 130(2):456-63. PubMed ID: 16077413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 4D flow CMR analysis comparing patients with anatomically shaped aortic sinus prostheses, tube prostheses and healthy subjects introducing the wall shear stress gradient: a case control study.
Sieren MM; Schultz V; Fujita B; Wegner F; Huellebrand M; Scharfschwerdt M; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A; Oechtering TH
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Aug; 22(1):59. PubMed ID: 32772927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of the sinuses of Valsalva in aortic root flow dynamics and aortic root surgery: evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging.
Schoenhoff FS; Loupatatzis C; Immer FF; Stoupis C; Carrel TP; Eckstein FS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jul; 18(4):380-5. PubMed ID: 19852141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement--a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI.
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Trauzeddel RF; Barker AJ; Gruettner H; Markl M; Schulz-Menger J
Int J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 170(3):426-33. PubMed ID: 24315151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wall shear stress and flow patterns in the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valves differ significantly from tricuspid aortic valves: a prospective study.
Meierhofer C; Schneider EP; Lyko C; Hutter A; Martinoff S; Markl M; Hager A; Hess J; Stern H; Fratz S
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Aug; 14(8):797-804. PubMed ID: 23230276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comprehensive Ex Vivo Comparison of 5 Clinically Used Conduit Configurations for Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement Using a 3-Dimensional-Printed Heart Simulator.
Paulsen MJ; Imbrie-Moore AM; Baiocchi M; Wang H; Hironaka CE; Lucian HJ; Farry JM; Thakore AD; Zhu Y; Ma M; MacArthur JW; Woo YJ
Circulation; 2020 Oct; 142(14):1361-1373. PubMed ID: 33017215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling conduit choice for valve-sparing aortic root replacement on biomechanics with a 3-dimensional-printed heart simulator.
Paulsen MJ; Kasinpila P; Imbrie-Moore AM; Wang H; Hironaka CE; Koyano TK; Fong R; Chiu P; Goldstone AB; Steele AN; Stapleton LM; Ma M; Woo YJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Aug; 158(2):392-403. PubMed ID: 30745047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 4D-flow cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after aortic root replacement with long-valved decellularized aortic homografts: comparison to valve-sparing aortic root replacement and healthy controls.
Cvitkovic T; Bobylev D; Horke A; Avsar M; Beerbaum P; Martens A; Böthig D; Petenà E; Gutberlet M; Beyer FH; Wacker F; Cebotari S; Haverich A; Vogel-Claussen J; Sarikouch S; Czerner C
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 May; 61(6):1307-1315. PubMed ID: 35079774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In-vivo assessment of the morphology and hemodynamic functions of the BioValsalva™ composite valve-conduit graft using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computational modelling technology.
Kidher E; Cheng Z; Jarral OA; O'Regan DP; Xu XY; Athanasiou T
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Dec; 9():193. PubMed ID: 25488105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breathhold time-resolved three-directional MR velocity mapping of aortic flow in patients after aortic valve-sparing surgery.
Liu X; Weale P; Reiter G; Kino A; Dill K; Gleason T; Carroll T; Carr J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Mar; 29(3):569-75. PubMed ID: 19243038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Hemodynamics After Aortic Root Replacement Using Valve-Sparing or Bioprosthetic Valved Conduit.
Collins JD; Semaan E; Barker A; McCarthy PM; Carr JC; Markl M; Malaisrie SC
Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Nov; 100(5):1556-62. PubMed ID: 26212514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perioperative evaluation of regional aortic wall shear stress patterns in patients undergoing aortic valve and/or proximal thoracic aortic replacement.
Bollache E; Fedak PWM; van Ooij P; Rahman O; Malaisrie SC; McCarthy PM; Carr JC; Powell A; Collins JD; Markl M; Barker AJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 155(6):2277-2286.e2. PubMed ID: 29248286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aortic hemodynamics assessment prior and after valve sparing reconstruction: A patient-specific 4D flow-based FSI model.
Nannini G; Caimi A; Palumbo MC; Saitta S; Girardi LN; Gaudino M; Roman MJ; Weinsaft JW; Redaelli A
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Aug; 135():104581. PubMed ID: 34174756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the AVNeo valve reduce wall stress on the aortic wall? A cardiac magnetic resonance analysis with 4D-flow for the evaluation of aortic valve replacement with the Ozaki technique.
Pirola S; Pirola S; Mastroiacovo G; Bonomi A; Manchester EL; Fisichella SM; Maragna R; Baggiano A; Mushtaq S; Muscogiuri G; Guglielmo M; Yun Xu X; Pontone G; Polvani G
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Dec; 64(6):. PubMed ID: 37656941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preliminary results by flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging after Tiron David I procedure with an anatomically shaped ascending aortic graft.
Frydrychowicz A; Berger A; Stalder AF; Markl M
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 19386661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
