347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30139670)
1. The tobacco industry's challenges to standardised packaging: A comparative analysis of issue framing in public relations campaigns in four countries.
MacKenzie R; Mathers A; Hawkins B; Eckhardt J; Smith J
Health Policy; 2018 Sep; 122(9):1001-1011. PubMed ID: 30139670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Containing diffusion: the tobacco industry's multipronged trade strategy to block tobacco standardised packaging.
Crosbie E; Eckford R; Bialous S
Tob Control; 2019 Mar; 28(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 29680829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of the logic and framing of a tobacco industry campaign opposing standardised packaging legislation in New Zealand.
Waa AM; Hoek J; Edwards R; Maclaurin J
Tob Control; 2017 Nov; 26(6):629-633. PubMed ID: 27694401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Presenting a strong and united front to tobacco industry interference : a content analysis of Australian newspaper coverage of tobacco plain packaging 2008-2014.
Miller CL; Brownbill AL; Dono J; Ettridge K
BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e023485. PubMed ID: 30224400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standardised tobacco packaging: a health policy case study of corporate conflict expansion and adaptation.
Hatchard JL; Fooks GJ; Gilmore AB
BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012634. PubMed ID: 27855104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tobacco industry argues domestic trademark laws and international treaties preclude cigarette health warning labels, despite consistent legal advice that the argument is invalid.
Crosbie E; Glantz SA
Tob Control; 2014 May; 23(3):e7. PubMed ID: 23179728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulatory chills: tobacco industry legal threats and the politics of tobacco standardised packaging in New Zealand.
Crosbie E; Thomson G
N Z Med J; 2018 Apr; 131(1473):25-41. PubMed ID: 29649194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the hand that controls the cigarette packet rule the smoker? Findings from ethnographic interviews with smokers in Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom and the USA.
Bell K; Dennis S; Robinson J; Moore R
Soc Sci Med; 2015 Oct; 142():136-44. PubMed ID: 26301486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Private Eye weighs in against tobacco industry's attack on plain packaging.
Kmietowicz Z
BMJ; 2013 May; 346():f2776. PubMed ID: 23635543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Can't see the woods for the trees: exploring the range and connection of tobacco industry argumentation in the 2012 UK standardised packaging consultation.
Lie JLY; Fooks G; de Vries NK; Heijndijk SM; Willemsen MC
Tob Control; 2018 Jul; 27(4):448-454. PubMed ID: 28743794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How tobacco companies in the United Kingdom prepared for, and responded to, standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco.
Moodie C; Angus K; Mitchell D; Critchlow N
Tob Control; 2018 Jul; 27(e1):e85-e92. PubMed ID: 29321273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Old wine in new bottles: tobacco industry's submission to European Commission tobacco product directive public consultation.
Hiilamo H; Glantz SA
Health Policy; 2015 Jan; 119(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 25467283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defending strong tobacco packaging and labelling regulations in Uruguay: transnational tobacco control network versus Philip Morris International.
Crosbie E; Sosa P; Glantz SA
Tob Control; 2018 Mar; 27(2):185-194. PubMed ID: 28336521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What comes after standardised packaging for tobacco?
Hopkinson NS
BMJ; 2016 May; 353():i2935. PubMed ID: 27221158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Attack on Australia: tobacco industry challenges to plain packaging.
Jarman H
J Public Health Policy; 2013 Aug; 34(3):375-87. PubMed ID: 23739175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Response of Retailers in Scotland to the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations and Tobacco Products Directive.
Purves RI; Moodie C; Eadie D; Stead M
Nicotine Tob Res; 2019 Feb; 21(3):309-313. PubMed ID: 30202853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A qualitative analysis of New Zealand retailers' responses to standardised packaging legislation and tobacco industry opposition.
Guthrie J; Hoek J; Darroch E; Wood Z
BMJ Open; 2015 Nov; 5(11):e009521. PubMed ID: 26553840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rhetoric and the law, or the law of rhetoric: How countries oppose novel tobacco control measures at the World Trade Organization.
Lencucha R; Drope J; Labonte R
Soc Sci Med; 2016 Sep; 164():100-107. PubMed ID: 27475056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cigarette brand variant portfolio strategy and the use of colour in a darkening market.
Greenland SJ
Tob Control; 2015 Mar; 24(e1):e65-71. PubMed ID: 23988859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective longitudinal study of tobacco company adaptation to standardised packaging in the UK: identifying circumventions and closing loopholes.
Evans-Reeves KA; Hiscock R; Lauber K; Gilmore AB
BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e028506. PubMed ID: 31551373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]