171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30139736)
1. Evaluation of a gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow system on hazardous sterile product preparation.
Roberts PA; Willoughby IR; Barnes N; Eckel SF; Paruscio A; Valgus JM; Amerine LB
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2018 Sep; 75(17):1286-1292. PubMed ID: 30139736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow for nonhazardous sterile product preparation.
Bucci TG; Hedrick TL; Roberts PA; Lin K; South MD; Willoughby IR; Eckel SF; Hess ET; Eberwein S; Amerine LB
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jul; 76(14):1071-1077. PubMed ID: 31361879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of telepharmacy and the use of a gravimetric technology-assisted workflow system for remote sterile product pharmacist checks.
Jean SJ; Francart SJ; Eckel SF; Schenkat D; Eberwein S; Lamm M; Barnes N; Valgus JM; Amerine LB
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2020 Mar; 77(7):560-567. PubMed ID: 32086506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicenter study to evaluate the benefits of technology-assisted workflow on i.v. room efficiency, costs, and safety.
Eckel SF; Higgins JP; Hess E; Cerbone T; Civiello JB; Conley C; Jafari N; Shah S; Speth SL; Thornton L
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jun; 76(12):895-901. PubMed ID: 31361850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicenter study to evaluate the benefits of technology-assisted workflow on i.v. room efficiency, costs, and safety in small community hospitals.
Higgins JP; Hardt S; Cowan D; Beasley E; Eckel SF
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jun; 76(13):964-969. PubMed ID: 31361882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of IV oncology infusions compounded via robotics and gravimetrics-assisted workflow processes.
Pang B; Earl M; Knoer S; Yaniv A; Willner M; Boyd A
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2021 Jan; 78(2):122-134. PubMed ID: 33064792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utilization of a technology-assisted workflow to prepare controlled substance oral syringes.
Nester T; Proffitt K; Anderson J; Hays A; Eidem L; Greszler C
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2023 Aug; 80(16):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 37210711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sterile product compounding using an i.v. compounding workflow management system at a pediatric hospital.
Moniz TT; Chu S; Tom C; Lutz P; Arnold A; Gura KM; Patterson A
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2014 Aug; 71(15):1311-7. PubMed ID: 25027539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of technology-assisted versus manual sterile compounding on safety and efficiency in a Canadian community hospital.
Fan M; Yang D; Ng B; Jackson J; Bouris K; Eng S; Rolko E; Trbovich P
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2022 Sep; 79(19):1685-1696. PubMed ID: 35700925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implementation and evaluation of an IV room technology-assisted workflow system integrated within the electronic medical record at oncology infusion center pharmacies.
Flanagin CM; Little J; Brookins L; Wills M
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2021 Jun; 78(13):1244-1251. PubMed ID: 33821924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Workforce planning and safe workload in sterile compounding hospital pharmacy services.
Chaker A; Omair I; Mohamed WH; Mahomed SH; Siddiqui MA
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2022 Jan; 79(3):187-192. PubMed ID: 34605883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implementation of an i.v.-compounding robot in a hospital-based cancer center pharmacy.
Yaniv AW; Knoer SJ
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2013 Nov; 70(22):2030-7. PubMed ID: 24173011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation and evaluation of a gravimetric i.v. workflow software system in an oncology ambulatory care pharmacy.
Reece KM; Lozano MA; Roux R; Spivey SM
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2016 Feb; 73(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 26796911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of real-time data obtained from gravimetric preparation of antineoplastic agents shows medication errors with possible critical therapeutic impact: Results of a large-scale, multicentre, multinational, retrospective study.
Terkola R; Czejka M; Bérubé J
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2017 Aug; 42(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 28429389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated endotoxin testing program for high-risk-level compounded sterile preparations at an institutional compounding pharmacy.
Cooper JF; Latta KS; Smith D
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2010 Feb; 67(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 20133532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A three-year study of a first-generation chemotherapy-compounding robot.
Nurgat Z; Faris D; Mominah M; Vibar A; Al-Jazairi A; Ewing S; Ashour M; Qaisi SK; Balhareth S; Al-Jedai A
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2015 Jun; 72(12):1036-45. PubMed ID: 26025995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Instruction on compounded sterile preparations at U.S. schools of pharmacy.
Hellums M; Alverson SP; Monk-Tutor MR
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2007 Nov; 64(21):2267-74. PubMed ID: 17959579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated compounding technology and workflow solutions for the preparation of chemotherapy: a systematic review.
Batson S; Mitchell SA; Lau D; Canobbio M; de Goede A; Singh I; Loesch U
Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2020 Nov; 27(6):330-336. PubMed ID: 33097615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of robotic antineoplastic preparation on safety, workflow, and costs.
Seger AC; Churchill WW; Keohane CA; Belisle CD; Wong ST; Sylvester KW; Chesnick MA; Burdick E; Wien MF; Cotugno MC; Bates DW; Rothschild JM
J Oncol Pract; 2012 Nov; 8(6):344-9, 1 p following 349. PubMed ID: 23598843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of intravenous medication preparation times before and after implementation of first-party digital image capture functionality.
Hsia BM; Shelton AT; Mara KC; Lim D; Mistri A; Ong K; Draper EW
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2023 May; 80(11):663-669. PubMed ID: 36860163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
