BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30142038)

  • 1. Influence of Shrinkage and Viscosity of Flowable Composite Liners on Cervical Microleakage of Class II Restorations: A Micro-CT Analysis.
    Nie J; Yap AU; Wang XY
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):656-664. PubMed ID: 30142038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento-enamel junction.
    Sadeghi M; Lynch CD
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 19544820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of flowable composite and restorative technique on microleakage of class II restorations.
    Hernandes NM; Catelan A; Soares GP; Ambrosano GM; Lima DA; Marchi GM; Martins LR; Aguiar FH
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 23946230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Micro-CT observations of the adaptation at gingival wall in Class II restorations with different dental restorative materials].
    Nie J; Wang XY; Gao XJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Apr; 47(2):317-20. PubMed ID: 25882952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
    Sadeghi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of pre-heating resin composite on restoration microleakage.
    Wagner WC; Aksu MN; Neme AM; Linger JB; Pink FE; Walker S
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 18335736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of fiber nets, application techniques and flowable composites on microleakage and the effect of fiber nets on polymerization shrinkage in class II MOD cavities.
    Ozel E; Soyman M
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19363973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study.
    Neme AM; Maxson BB; Pink FE; Aksu MN
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 12413226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.
    Ilie N; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21194743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Olmez A; Oztas N; Bodur H
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 15646229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations.
    Korkmaz Y; Ozel E; Attar N
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Apr; 9(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 17489480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners.
    Leevailoj C; Cochran MA; Matis BA; Moore BK; Platt JA
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 11357574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation of bulk-fill resin composites with different viscosities in class II restorations: a micro-CT evaluation.
    Baltacioğlu İH; Demirel G; Öztürk B; Aydin F; Orhan K
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):228. PubMed ID: 38350901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Polymerization shrinkage of different types of composite resins and microleakage with and without liner in class II cavities.
    Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 24147747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of apical microleakage in retrofillings with different resection angles.
    Lei MA; Mac Alpine Byrne CL; Iglesias AM; Kaplan AE
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2019 Dec; 32(3):126-132. PubMed ID: 32176235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of Class II resin-based composite restorations with flowable composite in the proximal box.
    Jain P; Belcher M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):235-8. PubMed ID: 11764108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.