These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30142631)
41. Validation of joint angle measurements: comparison of a novel low-cost marker-less system with an industry standard marker-based system. Bahadori S; Davenport P; Immins T; Wainwright TW J Med Eng Technol; 2019 Jan; 43(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 31033375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A Novel Method of Human Joint Prediction in an Occlusion Scene by Using Low-cost Motion Capture Technique. Niu J; Wang X; Wang D; Ran L Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 32085653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Kinect v2 tracked Body Joint Smoothing for Kinematic Analysis in Musculoskeletal Disorders. Mangal NK; Tiwari AK Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():5769-5772. PubMed ID: 33019285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Development of a Kinect Software Tool to Classify Movements during Active Video Gaming. Rosenberg M; Thornton AL; Lay BS; Ward B; Nathan D; Hunt D; Braham R PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159356. PubMed ID: 27442437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Concurrent Validity of Motion Parameters Measured With an RGB-D Camera-Based Markerless 3D Motion Tracking Method in Children and Young Adults. Hesse N; Baumgartner S; Gut A; Van Hedel HJA IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med; 2024; 12():580-588. PubMed ID: 39155921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Feasibility of a kinect-based system in assessing physical function of the elderly for home-based care. Liu XT; Nikkhoo M; Wang L; Chen CP; Chen HB; Chen CJ; Cheng CH BMC Geriatr; 2023 Aug; 23(1):495. PubMed ID: 37587451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Gait analysis with the Kinect v2: normative study with healthy individuals and comprehensive study of its sensitivity, validity, and reliability in individuals with stroke. Latorre J; Colomer C; Alcañiz M; Llorens R J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jul; 16(1):97. PubMed ID: 31349868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Virtual Reality in Upper Extremity Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ikbali Afsar S; Mirzayev I; Umit Yemisci O; Cosar Saracgil SN J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018 Dec; 27(12):3473-3478. PubMed ID: 30193810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of the Microsoft Kinect as a clinical assessment tool of body sway. Yeung LF; Cheng KC; Fong CH; Lee WC; Tong KY Gait Posture; 2014 Sep; 40(4):532-8. PubMed ID: 25047828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Validation of enhanced kinect sensor based motion capturing for gait assessment. Müller B; Ilg W; Giese MA; Ludolph N PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175813. PubMed ID: 28410413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Estimating physical activity energy expenditure with the Kinect Sensor in an exergaming environment. Nathan D; Huynh du Q; Rubenson J; Rosenberg M PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0127113. PubMed ID: 26000460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effects of Virtual Reality Training using Xbox Kinect on Motor Function in Stroke Survivors: A Preliminary Study. Park DS; Lee DG; Lee K; Lee G J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2313-2319. PubMed ID: 28606661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Marker-less versus marker-based driven musculoskeletal models of the spine during static load-handling activities. Asadi F; Arjmand N J Biomech; 2020 Nov; 112():110043. PubMed ID: 32950760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of 3D Joint Angles Measured With the Kinect 2.0 Skeletal Tracker Versus a Marker-Based Motion Capture System. Guess TM; Razu S; Jahandar A; Skubic M; Huo Z J Appl Biomech; 2017 Apr; 33(2):176-181. PubMed ID: 27918704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Agreement between Azure Kinect and Marker-Based Motion Analysis during Functional Movements: A Feasibility Study. Jo S; Song S; Kim J; Song C Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of Azure Kinect overground gait spatiotemporal parameters to marker based optical motion capture. Guess TM; Bliss R; Hall JB; Kiselica AM Gait Posture; 2022 Jul; 96():130-136. PubMed ID: 35635988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for providing lateral trunk lean feedback during gait retraining. Clark RA; Pua YH; Bryant AL; Hunt MA Gait Posture; 2013 Sep; 38(4):1064-6. PubMed ID: 23643880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Accuracy of a novel marker tracking approach based on the low-cost Microsoft Kinect v2 sensor. Timmi A; Coates G; Fortin K; Ackland D; Bryant AL; Gordon I; Pivonka P Med Eng Phys; 2018 Sep; 59():63-69. PubMed ID: 29983277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Kinect V2-Based Gait Analysis for Children with Cerebral Palsy: Validity and Reliability of Spatial Margin of Stability and Spatiotemporal Variables. Ma Y; Mithraratne K; Wilson N; Zhang Y; Wang X Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(6):. PubMed ID: 33802731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Modifying Kinect placement to improve upper limb joint angle measurement accuracy. Seo NJ; Fathi MF; Hur P; Crocher V J Hand Ther; 2016; 29(4):465-473. PubMed ID: 27769844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]