BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30143750)

  • 1. An international multicenter study to evaluate reproducibility of automated scoring for assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer.
    Rimm DL; Leung SCY; McShane LM; Bai Y; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Bayani J; Chang MC; Dean M; Denkert C; Enwere EK; Galderisi C; Gholap A; Hugh JC; Jadhav A; Kornaga EN; Laurinavicius A; Levenson R; Lima J; Miller K; Pantanowitz L; Piper T; Ruan J; Srinivasan M; Virk S; Wu Y; Yang H; Hayes DF; Nielsen TO; Dowsett M
    Mod Pathol; 2019 Jan; 32(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 30143750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analytical validation of a standardised scoring protocol for Ki67 immunohistochemistry on breast cancer excision whole sections: an international multicentre collaboration.
    Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Zabaglo LA; Arun I; Badve SS; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Borgquist S; Chang MC; Dodson A; Ehinger A; Fineberg S; Focke CM; Gao D; Gown AM; Gutierrez C; Hugh JC; Kos Z; Laenkholm AV; Mastropasqua MG; Moriya T; Nofech-Mozes S; Osborne CK; Penault-Llorca FM; Piper T; Sakatani T; Salgado R; Starczynski J; Sugie T; van der Vegt B; Viale G; Hayes DF; McShane LM; Dowsett M;
    Histopathology; 2019 Aug; 75(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 31017314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An international study to increase concordance in Ki67 scoring.
    Polley MY; Leung SC; Gao D; Mastropasqua MG; Zabaglo LA; Bartlett JM; McShane LM; Enos RA; Badve SS; Bane AL; Borgquist S; Fineberg S; Lin MG; Gown AM; Grabau D; Gutierrez C; Hugh JC; Moriya T; Ohi Y; Osborne CK; Penault-Llorca FM; Piper T; Porter PL; Sakatani T; Salgado R; Starczynski J; Lænkholm AV; Viale G; Dowsett M; Hayes DF; Nielsen TO
    Mod Pathol; 2015 Jun; 28(6):778-86. PubMed ID: 25698062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential immunohistochemistry and virtual image reconstruction using a single slide for quantitative KI67 measurement in breast cancer.
    Serna G; Simonetti S; Fasani R; Pagliuca F; Guardia X; Gallego P; Jimenez J; Peg V; Saura C; Eppenberger-Castori S; Ramon Y Cajal S; Terracciano L; Nuciforo P
    Breast; 2020 Oct; 53():102-110. PubMed ID: 32707454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simple digital image analysis system for automated Ki67 assessment in primary breast cancer.
    Alataki A; Zabaglo L; Tovey H; Dodson A; Dowsett M
    Histopathology; 2021 Aug; 79(2):200-209. PubMed ID: 33590538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An international Ki67 reproducibility study.
    Polley MY; Leung SC; McShane LM; Gao D; Hugh JC; Mastropasqua MG; Viale G; Zabaglo LA; Penault-Llorca F; Bartlett JM; Gown AM; Symmans WF; Piper T; Mehl E; Enos RA; Hayes DF; Dowsett M; Nielsen TO;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Dec; 105(24):1897-906. PubMed ID: 24203987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analytical validation of a standardized scoring protocol for Ki67: phase 3 of an international multicenter collaboration.
    Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Zabaglo L; Arun I; Badve SS; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Borgquist S; Chang MC; Dodson A; Enos RA; Fineberg S; Focke CM; Gao D; Gown AM; Grabau D; Gutierrez C; Hugh JC; Kos Z; Lænkholm AV; Lin MG; Mastropasqua MG; Moriya T; Nofech-Mozes S; Osborne CK; Penault-Llorca FM; Piper T; Sakatani T; Salgado R; Starczynski J; Viale G; Hayes DF; McShane LM; Dowsett M
    NPJ Breast Cancer; 2016; 2():16014. PubMed ID: 28721378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematically higher Ki67 scores on core biopsy samples compared to corresponding resection specimen in breast cancer: a multi-operator and multi-institutional study.
    Acs B; Leung SCY; Kidwell KM; Arun I; Augulis R; Badve SS; Bai Y; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Bayani J; Bigras G; Blank A; Buikema H; Chang MC; Dietz RL; Dodson A; Fineberg S; Focke CM; Gao D; Gown AM; Gutierrez C; Hartman J; Kos Z; Lænkholm AV; Laurinavicius A; Levenson RM; Mahboubi-Ardakani R; Mastropasqua MG; Nofech-Mozes S; Osborne CK; Penault-Llorca FM; Piper T; Quintayo MA; Rau TT; Reinhard S; Robertson S; Salgado R; Sugie T; van der Vegt B; Viale G; Zabaglo LA; Hayes DF; Dowsett M; Nielsen TO; Rimm DL;
    Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1362-1369. PubMed ID: 35729220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of automated Ki67 analysis to predict Oncotype DX risk-of-recurrence categories in early-stage breast cancer.
    Thakur SS; Li H; Chan AMY; Tudor R; Bigras G; Morris D; Enwere EK; Yang H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0188983. PubMed ID: 29304138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic potential of automated Ki67 evaluation in breast cancer: different hot spot definitions versus true global score.
    Robertson S; Acs B; Lippert M; Hartman J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 32572716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the international Ki67 working group cut point recommendations for early breast cancer: comparison with 21-gene assay results in a large integrated health care system.
    Shim VC; Baker RJ; Jing W; Puentes R; Agersborg SS; Lee TK; GoreaI W; Achacoso N; Lee C; Villasenor M; Lin A; Kapali M; Habel LA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Jan; 203(2):281-289. PubMed ID: 37847456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ki67 reproducibility using digital image analysis: an inter-platform and inter-operator study.
    Acs B; Pelekanou V; Bai Y; Martinez-Morilla S; Toki M; Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Rimm DL
    Lab Invest; 2019 Jan; 99(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 30181553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An interobserver reproducibility analysis of size-set semiautomatic counting for Ki67 assessment in breast cancer.
    Wang YX; Wang YY; Yang CG; Bu H; Yang WT; Wang L; Xu WM; Zhao XL; Zhao WX; Li L; Song SL; Yang JL
    Breast; 2020 Feb; 49():225-232. PubMed ID: 31911370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue.
    Laurinavicius A; Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Dasevicius D; Elie N; Iqbal Y; Bor C
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(2):R35. PubMed ID: 24708745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic value of automated KI67 scoring in breast cancer: a centralised evaluation of 8088 patients from 10 study groups.
    Abubakar M; Orr N; Daley F; Coulson P; Ali HR; Blows F; Benitez J; Milne R; Brenner H; Stegmaier C; Mannermaa A; Chang-Claude J; Rudolph A; Sinn P; Couch FJ; Devilee P; Tollenaar RA; Seynaeve C; Figueroa J; Sherman ME; Lissowska J; Hewitt S; Eccles D; Hooning MJ; Hollestelle A; Martens JW; van Deurzen CH; ; Bolla MK; Wang Q; Jones M; Schoemaker M; Wesseling J; van Leeuwen FE; Van 't Veer L; Easton D; Swerdlow AJ; Dowsett M; Pharoah PD; Schmidt MK; Garcia-Closas M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):104. PubMed ID: 27756439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated quantitative analysis of Ki-67 staining and HE images recognition and registration based on whole tissue sections in breast carcinoma.
    Feng M; Deng Y; Yang L; Jing Q; Zhang Z; Xu L; Wei X; Zhou Y; Wu D; Xiang F; Wang Y; Bao J; Bu H
    Diagn Pathol; 2020 May; 15(1):65. PubMed ID: 32471471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving Ki67 assessment concordance by the use of an artificial intelligence-empowered microscope: a multi-institutional ring study.
    Cai L; Yan K; Bu H; Yue M; Dong P; Wang X; Li L; Tian K; Shen H; Zhang J; Shang J; Niu S; Han D; Ren C; Huang J; Han X; Yao J; Liu Y
    Histopathology; 2021 Oct; 79(4):544-555. PubMed ID: 33840132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.
    Koopman T; Buikema HJ; Hollema H; de Bock GH; van der Vegt B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 May; 169(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29349710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ki 67 assessment in breast cancer in an Egyptian population: a comparative study between manual assessment on optical microscopy and digital quantitative assessment.
    Ayad E; Soliman A; Anis SE; Salem AB; Hu P; Dong Y
    Diagn Pathol; 2018 Aug; 13(1):63. PubMed ID: 30153851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Visual Assessment and Automated Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Labeling Index in Breast Cancer.
    Zhong F; Bi R; Yu B; Yang F; Yang W; Shui R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0150505. PubMed ID: 26928407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.