These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30143750)

  • 1. An international multicenter study to evaluate reproducibility of automated scoring for assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer.
    Rimm DL; Leung SCY; McShane LM; Bai Y; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Bayani J; Chang MC; Dean M; Denkert C; Enwere EK; Galderisi C; Gholap A; Hugh JC; Jadhav A; Kornaga EN; Laurinavicius A; Levenson R; Lima J; Miller K; Pantanowitz L; Piper T; Ruan J; Srinivasan M; Virk S; Wu Y; Yang H; Hayes DF; Nielsen TO; Dowsett M
    Mod Pathol; 2019 Jan; 32(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 30143750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analytical validation of a standardised scoring protocol for Ki67 immunohistochemistry on breast cancer excision whole sections: an international multicentre collaboration.
    Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Zabaglo LA; Arun I; Badve SS; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Borgquist S; Chang MC; Dodson A; Ehinger A; Fineberg S; Focke CM; Gao D; Gown AM; Gutierrez C; Hugh JC; Kos Z; Laenkholm AV; Mastropasqua MG; Moriya T; Nofech-Mozes S; Osborne CK; Penault-Llorca FM; Piper T; Sakatani T; Salgado R; Starczynski J; Sugie T; van der Vegt B; Viale G; Hayes DF; McShane LM; Dowsett M;
    Histopathology; 2019 Aug; 75(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 31017314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An international study to increase concordance in Ki67 scoring.
    Polley MY; Leung SC; Gao D; Mastropasqua MG; Zabaglo LA; Bartlett JM; McShane LM; Enos RA; Badve SS; Bane AL; Borgquist S; Fineberg S; Lin MG; Gown AM; Grabau D; Gutierrez C; Hugh JC; Moriya T; Ohi Y; Osborne CK; Penault-Llorca FM; Piper T; Porter PL; Sakatani T; Salgado R; Starczynski J; Lænkholm AV; Viale G; Dowsett M; Hayes DF; Nielsen TO
    Mod Pathol; 2015 Jun; 28(6):778-86. PubMed ID: 25698062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simple digital image analysis system for automated Ki67 assessment in primary breast cancer.
    Alataki A; Zabaglo L; Tovey H; Dodson A; Dowsett M
    Histopathology; 2021 Aug; 79(2):200-209. PubMed ID: 33590538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequential immunohistochemistry and virtual image reconstruction using a single slide for quantitative KI67 measurement in breast cancer.
    Serna G; Simonetti S; Fasani R; Pagliuca F; Guardia X; Gallego P; Jimenez J; Peg V; Saura C; Eppenberger-Castori S; Ramon Y Cajal S; Terracciano L; Nuciforo P
    Breast; 2020 Oct; 53():102-110. PubMed ID: 32707454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An international Ki67 reproducibility study.
    Polley MY; Leung SC; McShane LM; Gao D; Hugh JC; Mastropasqua MG; Viale G; Zabaglo LA; Penault-Llorca F; Bartlett JM; Gown AM; Symmans WF; Piper T; Mehl E; Enos RA; Hayes DF; Dowsett M; Nielsen TO;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Dec; 105(24):1897-906. PubMed ID: 24203987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Ki67 dilemma: investigating prognostic cut-offs and reproducibility for automated Ki67 scoring in breast cancer.
    Rewcastle E; Skaland I; Gudlaugsson E; Fykse SK; Baak JPA; Janssen EAM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Aug; 207(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 38797793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analytical validation of a standardized scoring protocol for Ki67: phase 3 of an international multicenter collaboration.
    Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Zabaglo L; Arun I; Badve SS; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Borgquist S; Chang MC; Dodson A; Enos RA; Fineberg S; Focke CM; Gao D; Gown AM; Grabau D; Gutierrez C; Hugh JC; Kos Z; Lænkholm AV; Lin MG; Mastropasqua MG; Moriya T; Nofech-Mozes S; Osborne CK; Penault-Llorca FM; Piper T; Sakatani T; Salgado R; Starczynski J; Viale G; Hayes DF; McShane LM; Dowsett M
    NPJ Breast Cancer; 2016; 2():16014. PubMed ID: 28721378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematically higher Ki67 scores on core biopsy samples compared to corresponding resection specimen in breast cancer: a multi-operator and multi-institutional study.
    Acs B; Leung SCY; Kidwell KM; Arun I; Augulis R; Badve SS; Bai Y; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Bayani J; Bigras G; Blank A; Buikema H; Chang MC; Dietz RL; Dodson A; Fineberg S; Focke CM; Gao D; Gown AM; Gutierrez C; Hartman J; Kos Z; Lænkholm AV; Laurinavicius A; Levenson RM; Mahboubi-Ardakani R; Mastropasqua MG; Nofech-Mozes S; Osborne CK; Penault-Llorca FM; Piper T; Quintayo MA; Rau TT; Reinhard S; Robertson S; Salgado R; Sugie T; van der Vegt B; Viale G; Zabaglo LA; Hayes DF; Dowsett M; Nielsen TO; Rimm DL;
    Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1362-1369. PubMed ID: 35729220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of automated Ki67 analysis to predict Oncotype DX risk-of-recurrence categories in early-stage breast cancer.
    Thakur SS; Li H; Chan AMY; Tudor R; Bigras G; Morris D; Enwere EK; Yang H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0188983. PubMed ID: 29304138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic potential of automated Ki67 evaluation in breast cancer: different hot spot definitions versus true global score.
    Robertson S; Acs B; Lippert M; Hartman J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 32572716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Independent Clinical Validation of the Automated Ki67 Scoring Guideline from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group.
    Boyaci C; Sun W; Robertson S; Acs B; Hartman J
    Biomolecules; 2021 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 34827609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the international Ki67 working group cut point recommendations for early breast cancer: comparison with 21-gene assay results in a large integrated health care system.
    Shim VC; Baker RJ; Jing W; Puentes R; Agersborg SS; Lee TK; GoreaI W; Achacoso N; Lee C; Villasenor M; Lin A; Kapali M; Habel LA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Jan; 203(2):281-289. PubMed ID: 37847456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ki67 reproducibility using digital image analysis: an inter-platform and inter-operator study.
    Acs B; Pelekanou V; Bai Y; Martinez-Morilla S; Toki M; Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Rimm DL
    Lab Invest; 2019 Jan; 99(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 30181553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An interobserver reproducibility analysis of size-set semiautomatic counting for Ki67 assessment in breast cancer.
    Wang YX; Wang YY; Yang CG; Bu H; Yang WT; Wang L; Xu WM; Zhao XL; Zhao WX; Li L; Song SL; Yang JL
    Breast; 2020 Feb; 49():225-232. PubMed ID: 31911370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue.
    Laurinavicius A; Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Dasevicius D; Elie N; Iqbal Y; Bor C
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(2):R35. PubMed ID: 24708745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic value of automated KI67 scoring in breast cancer: a centralised evaluation of 8088 patients from 10 study groups.
    Abubakar M; Orr N; Daley F; Coulson P; Ali HR; Blows F; Benitez J; Milne R; Brenner H; Stegmaier C; Mannermaa A; Chang-Claude J; Rudolph A; Sinn P; Couch FJ; Devilee P; Tollenaar RA; Seynaeve C; Figueroa J; Sherman ME; Lissowska J; Hewitt S; Eccles D; Hooning MJ; Hollestelle A; Martens JW; van Deurzen CH; ; Bolla MK; Wang Q; Jones M; Schoemaker M; Wesseling J; van Leeuwen FE; Van 't Veer L; Easton D; Swerdlow AJ; Dowsett M; Pharoah PD; Schmidt MK; Garcia-Closas M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):104. PubMed ID: 27756439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated quantitative analysis of Ki-67 staining and HE images recognition and registration based on whole tissue sections in breast carcinoma.
    Feng M; Deng Y; Yang L; Jing Q; Zhang Z; Xu L; Wei X; Zhou Y; Wu D; Xiang F; Wang Y; Bao J; Bu H
    Diagn Pathol; 2020 May; 15(1):65. PubMed ID: 32471471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving Ki67 assessment concordance by the use of an artificial intelligence-empowered microscope: a multi-institutional ring study.
    Cai L; Yan K; Bu H; Yue M; Dong P; Wang X; Li L; Tian K; Shen H; Zhang J; Shang J; Niu S; Han D; Ren C; Huang J; Han X; Yao J; Liu Y
    Histopathology; 2021 Oct; 79(4):544-555. PubMed ID: 33840132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.
    Koopman T; Buikema HJ; Hollema H; de Bock GH; van der Vegt B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 May; 169(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29349710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.