These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30143804)

  • 1. Analysis of VUS reporting, variant reinterpretation and recontact policies in clinical genomic sequencing consent forms.
    Vears DF; Niemiec E; Howard HC; Borry P
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2018 Dec; 26(12):1743-1751. PubMed ID: 30143804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recontact practices of cancer genetic counselors and an exploration of professional, legal, and ethical duty.
    Mueller A; Dalton E; Enserro D; Wang C; Flynn M
    J Genet Couns; 2019 Aug; 28(4):836-846. PubMed ID: 31058402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting practices for variants of uncertain significance from next generation sequencing technologies.
    Vears DF; Sénécal K; Borry P
    Eur J Med Genet; 2017 Oct; 60(10):553-558. PubMed ID: 28774848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing management practices for variants of uncertain significance among genetic counselors in pediatrics.
    Cheung C; Berger SM; Ross M; Kramer T; Li Y; Andrews C; Dergham KR; Spitz E; Florido ME; Ahimaz P
    J Genet Couns; 2024 Dec; 33(6):1312-1322. PubMed ID: 38217320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient and public preferences for being recontacted with updated genomic results: a mixed methods study.
    Mighton C; Clausen M; Sebastian A; Muir SM; Shickh S; Baxter NN; Scheer A; Glogowski E; Schrader KA; Thorpe KE; Kim THM; Lerner-Ellis J; Kim RH; Regier DA; Bayoumi AM; Bombard Y
    Hum Genet; 2021 Dec; 140(12):1695-1708. PubMed ID: 34537903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Utility of Reinterpreting Previously Reported Genomic Epilepsy Test Results for Pediatric Patients.
    SoRelle JA; Thodeson DM; Arnold S; Gotway G; Park JY
    JAMA Pediatr; 2019 Jan; 173(1):e182302. PubMed ID: 30398534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recontacting patients for multigene panel testing in hereditary cancer: Efficacy and insights.
    Sawyer L; Creswick H; Lewandowski R; Quillin J
    J Genet Couns; 2019 Dec; 28(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 31553108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there a duty to reinterpret genetic data? The ethical dimensions.
    Appelbaum PS; Parens E; Berger SM; Chung WK; Burke W
    Genet Med; 2020 Mar; 22(3):633-639. PubMed ID: 31616070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recontacting patients in clinical genetics services: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
    Carrieri D; Howard HC; Benjamin C; Clarke AJ; Dheensa S; Doheny S; Hawkins N; Halbersma-Konings TF; Jackson L; Kayserili H; Kelly SE; Lucassen AM; Mendes Á; Rial-Sebbag E; Stefánsdóttir V; Turnpenny PD; van El CG; van Langen IM; Cornel MC; Forzano F;
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2019 Feb; 27(2):169-182. PubMed ID: 30310124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recontact to return new or updated
    Panchal S; Mahajan R; Aujla N; McKay P; Casalino S; Di Gioacchino V; Charames GS; Lefebvre M; Metcalfe KA; Akbari MR; McCuaig JM; Lerner-Ellis J
    J Med Genet; 2024 Apr; 61(5):477-482. PubMed ID: 38124008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disclosure of cardiac variants of uncertain significance results in an exome cohort.
    Lawal TA; Lewis KL; Johnston JJ; Heidlebaugh AR; Ng D; Gaston-Johansson FG; Klein WMP; Biesecker BB; Biesecker LG
    Clin Genet; 2018 May; 93(5):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 29383714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reclassification of Variants of Uncertain Significance in Children with Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes is Predicted by Clinical Factors.
    Bennett JS; Bernhardt M; McBride KL; Reshmi SC; Zmuda E; Kertesz NJ; Garg V; Fitzgerald-Butt S; Kamp AN
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 40(8):1679-1687. PubMed ID: 31535183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Old Challenges or New Issues? Genetic Health Professionals' Experiences Obtaining Informed Consent in Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing.
    Vears DF; Borry P; Savulescu J; Koplin JJ
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 33017265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reinterpretation, reclassification, and its downstream effects: challenges for clinical laboratory geneticists.
    El Mecky J; Johansson L; Plantinga M; Fenwick A; Lucassen A; Dijkhuizen T; van der Hout A; Lyle K; van Langen I
    BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Nov; 12(1):170. PubMed ID: 31779608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recontacting in light of new genetic diagnostic techniques for patients with intellectual disability: Feasibility and parental perspectives.
    Beunders G; Dekker M; Haver O; Meijers-Heijboer HJ; Henneman L
    Eur J Med Genet; 2018 Apr; 61(4):213-218. PubMed ID: 29191497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Half of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants found on panel tests do not fulfil NHS testing criteria.
    Andoni T; Wiggins J; Robinson R; Charlton R; Sandberg M; Eeles R
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2507. PubMed ID: 35190596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom.
    Carrieri D; Dheensa S; Doheny S; Clarke AJ; Turnpenny PD; Lucassen AM; Kelly SE
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2017 Feb; 25(3):275-279. PubMed ID: 28051074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results.
    Bombard Y; Brothers KB; Fitzgerald-Butt S; Garrison NA; Jamal L; James CA; Jarvik GP; McCormick JB; Nelson TN; Ormond KE; Rehm HL; Richer J; Souzeau E; Vassy JL; Wagner JK; Levy HP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Apr; 104(4):578-595. PubMed ID: 30951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Points to consider for laboratories reporting results from diagnostic genomic sequencing.
    Vears DF; Sénécal K; Clarke AJ; Jackson L; Laberge AM; Lovrecic L; Piton A; Van Gassen KLI; Yntema HG; Knoppers BM; Borry P
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2018 Jan; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 29184171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experts reflecting on the duty to recontact patients and research participants; why professionals should take the lead in developing guidelines.
    Mitchell C; Ploem C; Retèl V; Gevers S; Hennekam R
    Eur J Med Genet; 2020 Feb; 63(2):103642. PubMed ID: 30904667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.