335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30143917)
1. Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.
Song LF; Bansal N; Zheng Z; Merz KM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1013-1026. PubMed ID: 30143917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.
Rizzi A; Murkli S; McNeill JN; Yao W; Sullivan M; Gilson MK; Chiu MW; Isaacs L; Gibb BC; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):937-963. PubMed ID: 30415285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.
Eken Y; Patel P; Díaz T; Jones MR; Wilson AK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 30225724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Absolute binding free energies for the SAMPL6 cucurbit[8]uril host-guest challenge via the AMOEBA polarizable force field.
Laury ML; Wang Z; Gordon AS; Ponder JW
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1087-1095. PubMed ID: 30324303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blinded predictions of standard binding free energies: lessons learned from the SAMPL6 challenge.
Papadourakis M; Bosisio S; Michel J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1047-1058. PubMed ID: 30159717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.
Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method.
Han K; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Nishikawa N; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1059-1073. PubMed ID: 30084077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the umbrella sampling and the double decoupling method in binding free energy predictions for SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenges.
Nishikawa N; Han K; Wu X; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1075-1086. PubMed ID: 30324304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the fly estimation of host-guest binding free energies using the movable type method: participation in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.
Bansal N; Zheng Z; Cerutti DS; Merz KM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 27699553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Converging free energies of binding in cucurbit[7]uril and octa-acid host-guest systems from SAMPL4 using expanded ensemble simulations.
Monroe JI; Shirts MR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 24610238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of SAMPL4 host-guest binding affinities using funnel metadynamics.
Hsiao YW; Söderhjelm P
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 24535628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Thermodynamic integration to predict host-guest binding affinities.
Lawrenz M; Wereszczynski J; Ortiz-Sánchez JM; Nichols SE; McCammon JA
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 22350568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AMOEBA binding free energies for the SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest challenge.
Shi Y; Laury ML; Wang Z; Ponder JW
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 33140208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Binding free energies in the SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with MM and QM methods.
Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Misini Ignjatović M; Wang M; Ryde U
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1027-1046. PubMed ID: 30203229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A replica exchange umbrella sampling (REUS) approach to predict host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL8 challenge.
Ghorbani M; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Aviat F; Meana-Pañeda R; Klauda JB; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 May; 35(5):667-677. PubMed ID: 33939083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MM/GBSA and LIE estimates of host-guest affinities: dependence on charges and solvation model.
Genheden S
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2011 Nov; 25(11):1085-93. PubMed ID: 22101362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Binding free energies in the SAMPL5 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with DFT-D3 and CCSD(T).
Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Riplinger C; Neese F; Ryde U
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):87-106. PubMed ID: 27600554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.
Muddana HS; Fenley AT; Mobley DL; Gilson MK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 24599514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting ligand binding affinity using on- and off-rates for the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge.
Dixon T; Lotz SD; Dickson A
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1001-1012. PubMed ID: 30141102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Force matching as a stepping stone to QM/MM CB[8] host/guest binding free energies: a SAMPL6 cautionary tale.
Hudson PS; Han K; Woodcock HL; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):983-999. PubMed ID: 30276502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
