BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30143917)

  • 21. Force matching as a stepping stone to QM/MM CB[8] host/guest binding free energies: a SAMPL6 cautionary tale.
    Hudson PS; Han K; Woodcock HL; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):983-999. PubMed ID: 30276502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A General Picture of Cucurbit[8]uril Host-Guest Binding.
    Sun Z; Huai Z; He Q; Liu Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Dec; 61(12):6107-6134. PubMed ID: 34818004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Blind prediction of binding affinities for charged supramolecular host-guest systems: achievements and shortcomings of DFT-D3.
    Sure R; Antony J; Grimme S
    J Phys Chem B; 2014 Mar; 118(12):3431-40. PubMed ID: 24588346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.
    Amezcua M; Setiadi J; Ge Y; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Oct; 36(10):707-734. PubMed ID: 36229622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. SAMPL7 Host-Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations.
    Amezcua M; El Khoury L; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 33392951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: computing binding free energies and enthalpies from explicit solvent simulations by the attach-pull-release (APR) method.
    Yin J; Henriksen NM; Slochower DR; Gilson MK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):133-145. PubMed ID: 27638809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinities and binding poses from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.
    Sun Z; He Q; Li X; Zhu Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):589-600. PubMed ID: 31974852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. SAMPL6 host-guest blind predictions using a non equilibrium alchemical approach.
    Procacci P; Guarrasi M; Guarnieri G
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):965-982. PubMed ID: 30128927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Binding Thermodynamics of Host-Guest Systems with SMIRNOFF99Frosst 1.0.5 from the Open Force Field Initiative.
    Slochower DR; Henriksen NM; Wang LP; Chodera JD; Mobley DL; Gilson MK
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Nov; 15(11):6225-6242. PubMed ID: 31603667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Protocols utilizing constant pH molecular dynamics to compute pH-dependent binding free energies.
    Kim MO; Blachly PG; Kaus JW; McCammon JA
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):861-72. PubMed ID: 25134690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comprehensive evaluation of end-point free energy techniques in carboxylated-pillar[6]arene host-guest binding: II. regression and dielectric constant.
    Liu X; Zheng L; Cong Y; Gong Z; Yin Z; Zhang JZH; Liu Z; Sun Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Dec; 36(12):879-894. PubMed ID: 36394776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Absolute binding free energies for octa-acids and guests in SAMPL5 : Evaluating binding free energies for octa-acid and guest complexes in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.
    Tofoleanu F; Lee J; Pickard Iv FC; König G; Huang J; Baek M; Seok C; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):107-118. PubMed ID: 27696242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computational Calorimetry: High-Precision Calculation of Host-Guest Binding Thermodynamics.
    Henriksen NM; Fenley AT; Gilson MK
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Sep; 11(9):4377-94. PubMed ID: 26523125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computational scheme for pH-dependent binding free energy calculation with explicit solvent.
    Lee J; Miller BT; Brooks BR
    Protein Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):231-43. PubMed ID: 26189656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A remark on the efficiency of the double-system/single-box nonequilibrium approach in the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge.
    Procacci P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Jun; 34(6):635-639. PubMed ID: 32277315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predicting binding affinities of host-guest systems in the SAMPL3 blind challenge: the performance of relative free energy calculations.
    König G; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 22198474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip host-guest systems in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.
    Lee J; Tofoleanu F; Pickard FC; König G; Huang J; Damjanović A; Baek M; Seok C; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):71-85. PubMed ID: 27677749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Toward Improved Force-Field Accuracy through Sensitivity Analysis of Host-Guest Binding Thermodynamics.
    Yin J; Fenley AT; Henriksen NM; Gilson MK
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Aug; 119(32):10145-55. PubMed ID: 26181208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. HYDROPHOBE Challenge: A Joint Experimental and Computational Study on the Host-Guest Binding of Hydrocarbons to Cucurbiturils, Allowing Explicit Evaluation of Guest Hydration Free-Energy Contributions.
    Assaf KI; Florea M; Antony J; Henriksen NM; Yin J; Hansen A; Qu ZW; Sure R; Klapstein D; Gilson MK; Grimme S; Nau WM
    J Phys Chem B; 2017 Dec; 121(49):11144-11162. PubMed ID: 29140701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding poses and binding affinities from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.
    Sun Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):105-115. PubMed ID: 32776199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.