108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30144340)
1. Cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma on bile duct brushings in the presence of stent associated changes: A retrospective analysis.
Goyal A; Sharaiha RZ; Alperstein SA; Siddiqui MT
Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Oct; 46(10):826-832. PubMed ID: 30144340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic bile duct brushing of malignant pancreatic biliary strictures: retrospective study with comparison of conventional smear and ThinPrep techniques.
Ylagan LR; Liu LH; Maluf HM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 12672095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytomorphologic characteristics of next-generation sequencing-positive bile duct brushing specimens.
Rosenbaum MW; Arpin R; Limbocker J; Casey B; Le L; Dudley J; Iafrate AJ; Pitman MB
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):520-527. PubMed ID: 32839152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors Impacting the Performance Characteristics of Bile Duct Brushings: A Clinico-Cytopathologic Analysis of 253 Patients.
Hacihasanoglu E; Memis B; Pehlivanoglu B; Avadhani V; Freedman AA; Goodman MM; Adsay NV; Reid MD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Jul; 142(7):863-870. PubMed ID: 29582676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biliary stent-related alterations can be distinguished from adenocarcinoma on bile duct brushings using a limited number of cytologic features.
Heath JE; Goicochea LB; Staats PN
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2015; 4(5):282-289. PubMed ID: 31051766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.
Volmar KE; Vollmer RT; Routbort MJ; Creager AJ
Cancer; 2006 Aug; 108(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 16541448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic pitfalls and the value of fluorescence in situ hybridization as an adjunct to cytologic evaluation of bile duct brushings in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2023 Feb; 51(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 36181472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears in detecting carcinoma in bile duct brushings.
Siddiqui MT; Gokaslan ST; Saboorian MH; Carrick K; Ashfaq R
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 12925981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic implication of extracellular mucin in pancreatic/biliary brushing and stent cytology.
Suben J; Goyal A; Rao R; Sung S
Cancer Cytopathol; 2023 Jun; 131(6):360-364. PubMed ID: 36808869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of the ThinPrep method in bile duct brushings: analysis of morphologic parameters associated with malignancy and determination of interobserver reliability.
Waugh MS; Guy CD; Maygarden SJ; Livasy CA; Jones CK; Volmar KE
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Sep; 36(9):651-6. PubMed ID: 18677761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Significance of atypia in pancreatic and bile duct brushings: follow-up analysis of the categories atypical and suspicious for malignancy.
Chadwick BE; Layfield LJ; Witt BL; Schmidt RL; Cox RN; Adler DG
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Apr; 42(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 24167030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bile duct involvement by hepatocellular carcinoma: A rare occurrence and poor prognostic indicator in bile duct brushing samples.
Bhattarai S; Graham RP; Sigel CS; Shi J; Gonzalez RS; Xue Y; Krasinskas AM; HooKim K; Adsay V; Reid MD
Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 127(11):691-699. PubMed ID: 31518056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of endoscopic bile duct brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures.
Trent V; Khurana KK; Pisharodi LR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1999 Aug; 123(8):712-5. PubMed ID: 10420229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cytologic predictors of malignancy in bile duct brushings: a multi-reviewer analysis of 60 cases.
Avadhani V; Hacihasanoglu E; Memis B; Pehlivanoglu B; Hanley KZ; Krishnamurti U; Krasinskas AM; Osunkoya AO; Daniels LM; Freedman AA; Goodman M; Adsay V; Reid MD
Mod Pathol; 2017 Sep; 30(9):1273-1286. PubMed ID: 28664934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated analysis of computerized morphological features of cell clusters associated with malignancy on bile duct brushing whole slide images.
Monabbati S; Leo P; Bera K; Michael CW; Nezami BG; Harbhajanka A; Madabhushi A
Cancer Med; 2023 Mar; 12(5):6365-6378. PubMed ID: 36281473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.
Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of loss of heterozygosity in atypical and negative bile duct brushing cytology specimens with malignant outcome: are "false-negative" cytologic findings a representation of morphologically subtle molecular alterations?
Krishnamurti U; Sasatomi E; Swalsky PA; Finkelstein SD; Ohori NP
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 Jan; 131(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17227126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The outcomes of "atypical" and "suspicious" bile duct brushings in the identification of pancreaticobiliary tumors: Follow-up analysis of surgical resection specimens.
Choi WT; Swanson PE; Grieco VS; Wang D; Westerhoff M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 26221777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of malignant cytologic criteria in pancreatobiliary brushings with corresponding positive fluorescence in situ hybridization results.
Barr Fritcher EG; Caudill JL; Blue JE; Djuric K; Feipel L; Maritim BK; Ragheb AA; Halling KC; Henry MR; Clayton AC
Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 136(3):442-9. PubMed ID: 21846921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
