289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30144416)
1. Defining adenoma detection rate benchmarks in average-risk male veterans.
El-Halabi MM; Rex DK; Saito A; Eckert GJ; Kahi CJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jan; 89(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 30144416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Defining Benchmarks for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenomas Per Colonoscopy in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy Due to a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test.
Hilsden RJ; Bridges R; Dube C; McGregor SE; Naugler C; Rose SM; Rostom A; Heitman SJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 111(12):1743-1749. PubMed ID: 27725649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colonoscopy practice for veterans within and outside the Veterans Affairs setting: a matched cohort study.
Bartel MJ; Robertson DJ; Pohl H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Aug; 84(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 26784365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adenoma Detection Rate in Asymptomatic Patients with Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests.
Kligman E; Li W; Eckert GJ; Kahi C
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 May; 63(5):1167-1172. PubMed ID: 29468377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.
Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.
Sanaka MR; Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel TD; Podugu A; Thota PN; Lopez R; Kiran RP; Burke CA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 26024584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adenoma detection rates in colonoscopies for positive fecal immunochemical tests versus direct screening colonoscopies.
Wong JCT; Chiu HM; Kim HS; Byeon JS; Matsuda T; Kobayashi N; Wu DC; Ong DE; Sung JJY;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):607-613.e1. PubMed ID: 30452915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of adenomas per colonoscopy and adenomas per positive participant as new quality parameters in screening colonoscopy.
Gessl I; Waldmann E; Penz D; Majcher B; Dokladanska A; Hinterberger A; Szymanska A; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30138613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Defining and Applying Locally Relevant Benchmarks for the Adenoma Detection Rate.
Hilsden RJ; Rose SM; Dube C; Rostom A; Bridges R; McGregor SE; Brenner DR; Heitman SJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2019 Aug; 114(8):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 30848731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving measurement of the adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy quality metric: the Indiana University experience.
Kahi CJ; Vemulapalli KC; Johnson CS; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Mar; 79(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 24246797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Longitudinal Study of Adenoma Detection Rate in Gastroenterology Fellowship Training.
Gianotti RJ; Oza SS; Tapper EB; Kothari D; Sheth SG
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Oct; 61(10):2831-2837. PubMed ID: 27405989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate.
Greenspan M; Rajan KB; Baig A; Beck T; Mobarhan S; Melson J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92. PubMed ID: 23711625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance.
Wang HS; Pisegna J; Modi R; Liang LJ; Atia M; Nguyen M; Cohen H; Ohning G; van Oijen M; Spiegel BM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jan; 77(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 23261096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) Irrespective of Indication Is Comparable to Screening ADR: Implications for Quality Monitoring.
Kaltenbach T; Gawron A; Meyer CS; Gupta S; Shergill A; Dominitz JA; Soetikno RM; Nguyen-Vu T; A Whooley M; Kahi CJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1883-1889.e1. PubMed ID: 33618027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
