186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30144938)
21. Improving the relevance of randomised trials to primary care: a qualitative study investigating views towards pragmatic trials and the PRECIS-2 tool.
Forbes G; Loudon K; Clinch M; Taylor SJC; Treweek S; Eldridge S
Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):711. PubMed ID: 31829266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Trends in the Explanatory or Pragmatic Nature of Cardiovascular Clinical Trials Over 2 Decades.
Sepehrvand N; Alemayehu W; Das D; Gupta AK; Gouda P; Ghimire A; Du AX; Hatami S; Babadagli HE; Verma S; Kashour Z; Ezekowitz JA
JAMA Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 4(11):1122-1128. PubMed ID: 31473763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Designing provider-focused implementation trials with purpose and intent: introducing the PRECIS-2-PS tool.
Norton WE; Loudon K; Chambers DA; Zwarenstein M
Implement Sci; 2021 Jan; 16(1):7. PubMed ID: 33413489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 3. Patient selection challenges and consequences.
Oude Rengerink K; Kalkman S; Collier S; Ciaglia A; Worsley SD; Lightbourne A; Eckert L; Groenwold RHH; Grobbee DE; Irving EA;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():173-180. PubMed ID: 28502808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Using segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series data to assess colonoscopy quality outcomes of a web-enhanced implementation toolkit to support evidence-based practices for bowel preparation: a study protocol.
Ramsey AT; Maki J; Prusaczyk B; Yan Y; Wang J; Lobb R
Implement Sci; 2015 Jun; 10():85. PubMed ID: 26050105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The value of the pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary wheel in an ongoing study: the bullous pemphigoid steroids and tetracyclines study.
Bratton DJ; Nunn AJ; Wojnarowska F; Kirtschig G; Sandell A; Williams HC
Trials; 2012 Apr; 13():50. PubMed ID: 22540678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pilot and feasibility studies for pragmatic trials have unique considerations and areas of uncertainty.
Chan CL; Taljaard M; Lancaster GA; Brehaut JC; Eldridge SM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():102-114. PubMed ID: 34229091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of meta-analytic methods for synthesizing evidence from explanatory and pragmatic trials.
Sajobi TT; Li G; Awosoga O; Wang M; Menon BK; Hill MD; Thabane L
Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 7(1):19. PubMed ID: 29370830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Push and Pull of Self-Managing Mild COPD: An Evaluation of Participant Experiences of a Nurse-Led Telephone Health Coaching Intervention.
Coventry PA; Blakemore A; Baker E; Sidhu M; Fitzmaurice D; Jolly K
Qual Health Res; 2019 Apr; 29(5):658-671. PubMed ID: 30501475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Readiness assessment for pragmatic trials (RAPT): a model to assess the readiness of an intervention for testing in a pragmatic trial.
Baier RR; Jutkowitz E; Mitchell SL; McCreedy E; Mor V
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):156. PubMed ID: 31319789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Willingness to participate in pragmatic dialysis trials: the importance of physician decisional autonomy and consent approach.
Courtright KR; Halpern SD; Joffe S; Ellenberg SS; Karlawish J; Madden V; Gabler NB; Szymanski S; Yadav KN; Dember LM
Trials; 2017 Oct; 18(1):474. PubMed ID: 29020994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pragmatic trials and implementation science: grounds for divorce?
Pawson R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):176. PubMed ID: 31420024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The "pragmatic trial": An essentially contested concept?
Pawson R
J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):943-954. PubMed ID: 31313412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Lifestyle Physical Activity Intervention for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Coultas DB; Jackson BE; Russo R; Peoples J; Sloan J; Singh KP; Ashmore J; Blair SN; Uhm M; Bae S
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 May; 13(5):617-26. PubMed ID: 26785249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Understanding the applicability of results from primary care trials: lessons learned from applying PRECIS-2.
Forbes G; Loudon K; Treweek S; Taylor SJC; Eldridge S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():119-126. PubMed ID: 28629699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered?
Mansouri A; Cooper B; Shin SM; Kondziolka D
J Neurosurg; 2016 Feb; 124(2):558-68. PubMed ID: 26315006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Are trials of psychological and psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia and psychosis included in the NICE guidelines pragmatic? A systematic review.
Gastaldon C; Mosler F; Toner S; Tedeschi F; Bird VJ; Barbui C; Priebe S
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222891. PubMed ID: 31550279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Study characteristics impacted the pragmatism of randomized controlled trial published in nursing: a meta-epidemiological study.
Devos F; Foissac F; Bouazza N; Ancel PY; Tréluyer JM; Chappuy H
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 116():18-25. PubMed ID: 31374332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How pragmatic are randomized trials of remdesivir and favipiravir for in-hospital treatment of COVID-19: a descriptive methodological review of trial design using the PRECIS-2 framework.
Sharma T; Qamar I; Zwarenstein M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 152():193-200. PubMed ID: 36265553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pragmatic clinical trial design in emergency medicine: Study considerations and design types.
Gettel CJ; Yiadom MYAB; Bernstein SL; Grudzen CR; Nath B; Li F; Hwang U; Hess EP; Melnick ER
Acad Emerg Med; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1247-1257. PubMed ID: 35475533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
