356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30145670)
21. Arthroscopic tenodesis using a bioabsorbable interference screw and soft anchor: A case series of 60 patients.
Sasaki Y; Ochiai N; Kenmoku T; Yamaguchi T; Kijima T; Hashimoto E; Ohtori S
J Orthop Sci; 2020 May; 25(3):410-415. PubMed ID: 31153740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model.
Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Lin CL; Yeh ML; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1755-1761. PubMed ID: 29482858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Anatomic landmarks for arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: a cadaveric study.
Neviaser AS; Patterson DC; Cagle PJ; Parsons BO; Flatow EL
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1172-1177. PubMed ID: 29500072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Interference Screw and Suture Anchor Techniques for Biceps Tenodesis.
Park JS; Kim SH; Jung HJ; Lee YH; Oh JH
Am J Sports Med; 2017 Feb; 45(2):440-448. PubMed ID: 28146397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A technique for an arthroscopic proximal biceps tenodesis using a fork anchor.
Amin NH; Volpi A; Simons M; Mills G; Silver S
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(3):2309499017727944. PubMed ID: 28851262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical evaluation of two arthroscopic techniques for biceps tenodesis: triple loop suture versus simple suture.
Gigi R; Dolkart O; Sharfman ZT; Goldstein Y; Brosh T; Rath E; Maman E; Chechik O
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Jan; 26(1):165-169. PubMed ID: 27499518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Arthroscopic Transtendinous Biceps Tenodesis With All-Suture Anchor.
Shih CA; Chiang FL; Hong CK; Lin CW; Wang PH; Jou IM; Su WR
Arthrosc Tech; 2017 Jun; 6(3):e705-e709. PubMed ID: 28706821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An Arthroscopic Technique for Long Head of Biceps Tenodesis With Double Knotless Screw.
Su WR; Ling FY; Hong CK; Chang CH; Chung KC; Jou IM
Arthrosc Tech; 2015 Aug; 4(4):e375-8. PubMed ID: 26759780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical and sonographic evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis with a dual suture anchor technique demonstrates improved outcomes and a low failure rate at a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Jacxsens M; Granger EK; Tashjian RZ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Jan; 138(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 29038845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The keyhole technique for arthroscopic tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon. In vivo prospective study with a radio-opaque marker.
Kany J; Guinand R; Amaravathi RS; Alassaf I
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Feb; 101(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 25579826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. All-suture anchor size and drill angle influence load to failure in a porcine model of subpectoral biceps tenodesis, a biomechanical study.
Alt PS; Marx C; Braun S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 May; 25(1):408. PubMed ID: 38783272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Suture anchor and percutaneous intra-articular transtendon biceps tenodesis.
Moros C; Levine WN; Ahmad CS
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev; 2008 Sep; 16(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 18703978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical properties of suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with double-anchor knotless luggage tag sutures vs. subpectoral biceps tenodesis with single-anchor whipstitch suture using all-suture anchors.
Nicolay RW; Jahandar A; Retzky JS; Kontaxis A; Verma NN; Fu MC
JSES Int; 2023 Nov; 7(6):2393-2399. PubMed ID: 37969507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Radiostereometric Analysis of Tendon Migration After Arthroscopic and Mini-Open Biceps Tenodesis: Interference Screw Versus Single Suture Anchor Fixation.
Forsythe B; Patel HH; Berlinberg EJ; Forlenza EM; Okoroha KR; Williams BT; Yanke AB; Cole BJ; Verma NN
Am J Sports Med; 2023 Sep; 51(11):2869-2880. PubMed ID: 37548005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation.
Tashjian RZ; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1408-12. PubMed ID: 23415819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A biomechanical comparison of two arthroscopic suture techniques in biceps tenodesis: whip-stitch vs. simple suture techniques.
Agarwalla A; Puzzitiello RN; Leong NL; Shewman EF; Verma NN; Romeo AA; Forsythe B
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Aug; 28(8):1531-1536. PubMed ID: 30948215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Surgical technique for arthroscopic onlay suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with an all-suture anchor.
Lansdown DA; Bernardoni ED; Verma NN
JSES Open Access; 2018 Mar; 2(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 30675570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Arthroscopic Suprapectoral and Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis: Radiographic Characteristics.
Hodgins JL; Kovacevic D; Purcell S; Jobin CM; Levine WN; Ahmad CS
Arthroscopy; 2016 Nov; 32(11):2234-2242. PubMed ID: 27265249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis Outcomes: A Comparison of Inlay and Onlay Techniques.
Haidamous G; Noyes MP; Denard PJ
Am J Sports Med; 2020 Oct; 48(12):3051-3056. PubMed ID: 32924536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical comparison of a knotless suture anchor with standard suture anchor in the repair of type II SLAP tears.
Sileo MJ; Lee SJ; Kremenic IJ; Orishimo K; Ben-Avi S; McHugh M; Nicholas SJ
Arthroscopy; 2009 Apr; 25(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 19341920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
