These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30146651)

  • 1. [A novel magnetic orthopedic appliance in treatment of preadolescent mild skeletal Class Ⅲ patients].
    Zhao N; Feng J; Hu Z; Chen RJ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2018 Apr; 27(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 30146651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of a novel magnetic orthopedic appliance (MOA-III) on the dentofacial complex in mild to moderate skeletal class III children.
    Zhao N; Feng J; Hu Z; Chen R; Shen G
    Head Face Med; 2015 Oct; 11():34. PubMed ID: 26468063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.
    Macdonald KE; Kapust AJ; Turley PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10393575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment outcomes of various force applications in growing patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Lim LI; Choi JY; Ahn HW; Kim SH; Chung KR; Nelson G
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Jul; 91(4):449-458. PubMed ID: 33587106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Class III magnetic orthopedic forces on the craniofacial sutures of rhesus monkeys.
    Zhao N; Xu Y; Chen Y; Xu Y; Han X; Wang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):401-9. PubMed ID: 18331940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
    Bielawska H
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Rodrigues de Almeida M; Castanha Henriques JF; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Ursi W
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment effects of occipitomental anchorage appliance of maxillary protraction combined with chincup traction in children with Class III malocclusion.
    Lin HC; Chang HP; Chang HF
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2007 May; 106(5):380-91. PubMed ID: 17561473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cephalometric outcomes of a new orthopaedic appliance for Class III malocclusion treatment.
    Martina R; D'Antò V; De Simone V; Galeotti A; Rongo R; Franchi L
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):187-192. PubMed ID: 31314883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment effects of Fränkel functional regulator III in children with class III malocclusions.
    Baik HS; Jee SH; Lee KJ; Oh TK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):294-301. PubMed ID: 15014405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Changes of hard tissues in patients with functional and skeletal Angel Class Ⅲ malocclusion after FRⅢ appliance treatment].
    Zhang N; Wang S; Zheng W; Chen M; Shen YF; Yan HJ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Dec; 25(6):725-728. PubMed ID: 28275799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Efficacy evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance and tooth extraction in skeletal Class II malocclusion].
    Gong Y; Yu Q; Li PL; Wang HH; Wei B; Shen G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2014 Oct; 23(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 25543606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment with facemask and removable upper appliance versus modified tandem traction bow appliance: the effects on mandibular space.
    Tortop T; Kaygisiz E; Erkun S; Yuksel S
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 29059295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgery-first approach in skeletal class III malocclusion treated with 2-jaw surgery: evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment.
    Baek SH; Ahn HW; Kwon YH; Choi JY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):332-8. PubMed ID: 20186090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.