These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30147670)

  • 21. Decision-making in Orthopaedic Oncology: Does Cognitive Bias Affect a Virtual Patient's Choice Between Limb Salvage and Amputation?
    Gurich RW; Cizik AM; Punt SE; Namekata M; Johnson CN; Symons RG; Brewer EG; Thompson MJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Mar; 478(3):506-514. PubMed ID: 31173578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do People Explicitly Make a Frame Choice Based on the Reference Point?
    Honda H; Shirasuna M; Matsuka T; Ueda K
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2552. PubMed ID: 30618973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Beliefs About Gambling Mediate the Effect of Cognitive Style on Gambling Problems.
    Armstrong T; Rockloff M; Browne M; Blaszczynski A
    J Gambl Stud; 2020 Sep; 36(3):871-886. PubMed ID: 32215774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mixed Frames and Risky Decision-Making.
    Peng J; Zhang J; Sun H; Zeng Z; Mai Y; Miao D
    Psychol Rep; 2017 Dec; 120(6):1037-1057. PubMed ID: 28675326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The moderating role of objective and subjective numeracy in attribute framing.
    Gamliel E; Kreiner H; Garcia-Retamero R
    Int J Psychol; 2016 Apr; 51(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 25640471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Replicating the Disease framing problem during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic: A study of stress, worry, trust, and choice under risk.
    Rachev NR; Han H; Lacko D; Gelpí R; Yamada Y; Lieberoth A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257151. PubMed ID: 34506543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of response format on cognitive reflection: Validating a two- and four-option multiple choice question version of the Cognitive Reflection Test.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2511-2522. PubMed ID: 29589333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differences in decisions affected by cognitive biases: examining human values, need for cognition, and numeracy.
    Kakinohana RK; Pilati R
    Psicol Reflex Crit; 2023 Sep; 36(1):26. PubMed ID: 37676441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lay, professional, and artificial intelligence perspectives on risky medical decisions and COVID-19: How does the number of lives matter in clinical trials framed as gains versus losses?
    Mukherjee S; Reji D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 May; 75(5):784-795. PubMed ID: 34609226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fear and anger have opposite effects on risk seeking in the gain frame.
    Habib M; Cassotti M; Moutier S; Houdé O; Borst G
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():253. PubMed ID: 25806015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Choice Under Risk: How Occupation Influences Preferences.
    Hill T; Kusev P; van Schaik P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2003. PubMed ID: 31543852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computations and Connectivity Underlying Aversive Counterfactuals.
    Mills-Finnerty C; Hanson C; Khadr M; José Hanson S
    Brain Connect; 2020 Nov; 10(9):467-478. PubMed ID: 32842766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making.
    Mishra S; Gregson M; Lalumière ML
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 103(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 22229776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Explaining risky choices with judgments: Framing, the zero effect, and the contextual relativity of gist.
    Reyna VF; Brainerd CJ; Chen Z; Bookbinder SH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1037-1053. PubMed ID: 33914575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High But Not Low Probability of Gain Elicits a Positive Feeling Leading to the Framing Effect.
    Gosling CJ; Moutier S
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():81. PubMed ID: 28232808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Toward an understanding of the influence of cultural background and domain experience on the effects of risk-pricing formats on risk perception.
    Fraser-Mackenzie P; Sung MC; Johnson JE
    Risk Anal; 2014 Oct; 34(10):1846-69. PubMed ID: 24773631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Framing effects on financial and health problems in gambling disorder.
    Takeuchi H; Tsurumi K; Murao T; Mizuta H; Kawada R; Murai T; Takahashi H
    Addict Behav; 2020 Nov; 110():106502. PubMed ID: 32563020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
    Stacey D; Légaré F; Col NF; Bennett CL; Barry MJ; Eden KB; Holmes-Rovner M; Llewellyn-Thomas H; Lyddiatt A; Thomson R; Trevena L; Wu JH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jan; (1):CD001431. PubMed ID: 24470076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Role of accentuation in the selection/rejection task framing effect.
    Chen J; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Apr; 146(4):543-568. PubMed ID: 28383992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.