These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30147670)

  • 41. Testing the adaptability of people's use of attribute frame information.
    Harris AJL; Jenkins SC; Ma GWS; Oh A
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104720. PubMed ID: 33865045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The interplay between the importance of a decision and emotion in decision-making.
    Gosling CJ; Caparos S; Moutier S
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Sep; 34(6):1260-1270. PubMed ID: 32193991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cultural Variability in the Attribute Framing Effect.
    Cheon JE; Nam Y; Kim KJ; Lee HI; Park HG; Kim YH
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():754265. PubMed ID: 34987445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Framing From Experience: Cognitive Processes and Predictions of Risky Choice.
    Gonzalez C; Mehlhorn K
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Jul; 40(5):1163-91. PubMed ID: 27427284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Group size and the framing effect: threats to human beings and animals.
    Bloomfield AN
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jun; 34(4):929-37. PubMed ID: 17063922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Exploring relationships between problem gambling, scratch card gambling, and individual differences in thinking style.
    Stange M; Walker AC; Koehler DJ; Fugelsang JA; Dixon MJ
    J Behav Addict; 2018 Dec; 7(4):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 30567454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Framing effects in medical situations: distinctions of attribute, goal and risky choice frames.
    Peng J; Jiang Y; Miao D; Li R; Xiao W
    J Int Med Res; 2013 Jun; 41(3):771-6. PubMed ID: 23613497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Self-Initiated Actions Under Different Choice Architectures Affect Framing and Target Evaluation Even Without Verbal Manipulation.
    Onuki Y; Honda H; Ueda K
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1449. PubMed ID: 32760315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Sudharsanan N; Favaretti C; Hachaturyan V; Bärnighausen T; Vandormael A
    Trials; 2021 Sep; 22(1):592. PubMed ID: 34488843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Framing Preference for Large and Increasing Components in Static and Dynamic Descriptions.
    Pander Maat H; Staal B; Holleman B
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():720427. PubMed ID: 34867599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Who's been framed? Framing effects are reduced in financial gambles made for others.
    Ziegler FV; Tunney RJ
    BMC Psychol; 2015; 3(1):9. PubMed ID: 25870764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A framing effect of intertemporal and spatial choice.
    Kuang Y; Huang YN; Li S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jun; 76(6):1298-1320. PubMed ID: 35848147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessment of unconscious decision aids applied to complex patient-centered medical decisions.
    Manigault AW; Handley IM; Whillock SR
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Feb; 17(2):e37. PubMed ID: 25677337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. State-dependent risky choices in primates: Variation in energy budget does not affect tufted capuchin monkeys' (Sapajus spp.) risky choices.
    Ciacci F; Mayerhoff S; De Petrillo F; Gastaldi S; Brosnan SF; Addessi E
    Am J Primatol; 2023 Oct; 85(10):e23542. PubMed ID: 37545247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Influential Cognitive Processes on Framing Biases in Aging.
    Perez AM; Spence JS; Kiel LD; Venza EE; Chapman SB
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():661. PubMed ID: 29867641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Decision experience in hyperchoice: the role of numeracy and age differences.
    Peterson N; Cheng J
    Curr Psychol; 2022; 41(8):5399-5411. PubMed ID: 32952368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. People's Financial Choice Depends on their Previous Task Success or Failure.
    Sekścińska K
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1730. PubMed ID: 26635654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. How Cues of Being Watched Promote Risk Seeking in Fund Investment in Older Adults.
    Li M; Peng H
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():765632. PubMed ID: 35095651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Are you mind-wandering, or is your mind on task? The effect of probe framing on mind-wandering reports.
    Weinstein Y; De Lima HJ; van der Zee T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):754-760. PubMed ID: 28577275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Influence of negative emotion on the framing effect: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ma Q; Pei G; Wang K
    Neuroreport; 2015 Apr; 26(6):325-32. PubMed ID: 25714423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.