These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30148040)

  • 1. Understanding the Assumptions Underlying Instrumental Variable Analyses: a Brief Review of Falsification Strategies and Related Tools.
    Labrecque J; Swanson SA
    Curr Epidemiol Rep; 2018; 5(3):214-220. PubMed ID: 30148040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of the instrumental inequalities in simulated mendelian randomization analyses with coarsened exposures.
    Diemer EW; Shi J; Hernan MA; Swanson SA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2024 May; 39(5):491-499. PubMed ID: 38819552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can we apply the Mendelian randomization methodology without considering epigenetic effects?
    Ogbuanu IU; Zhang H; Karmaus W
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2009 May; 6():3. PubMed ID: 19432981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Falsification Tests for Instrumental Variable Designs With an Application to Tendency to Operate.
    Keele L; Zhao Q; Kelz RR; Small D
    Med Care; 2019 Feb; 57(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 30520835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Falsification of the instrumental variable conditions in Mendelian randomization studies in the UK Biobank.
    Guo K; Diemer EW; Labrecque JA; Swanson SA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2023 Sep; 38(9):921-927. PubMed ID: 37253997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Credible Mendelian randomization studies: approaches for evaluating the instrumental variable assumptions.
    Glymour MM; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Robins JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 175(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 22247045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Instrumental variables in real-world clinical studies of dementia and neurodegenerative disease: Systematic review of the subject-matter argumentation, falsification test, and study design strategies to justify a valid instrument.
    Hiu S; Yong T; Hasoon J; Teare MD; Taylor JP; Lin N
    Brain Behav; 2024 Jan; 14(1):e3371. PubMed ID: 38376026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Challenges and factors that influencing causal inference and interpretation, based on Mendelian randomization studies].
    Wang YZ; Shen HB
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 41(8):1231-1236. PubMed ID: 32867428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A tutorial on the use of instrumental variables in pharmacoepidemiology.
    Ertefaie A; Small DS; Flory JH; Hennessy S
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Apr; 26(4):357-367. PubMed ID: 28239929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of the Instrumental Inequalities to a Mendelian Randomization Study With Multiple Proposed Instruments.
    Diemer EW; Labrecque J; Tiemeier H; Swanson SA
    Epidemiology; 2020 Jan; 31(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 31790379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating a Key Instrumental Variable Assumption Using Randomization Tests.
    Branson Z; Keele L
    Am J Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 189(11):1412-1420. PubMed ID: 32432319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting.
    Boef AG; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):496-511. PubMed ID: 25953784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.
    Hogan JW; Lancaster T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 14746439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological challenges in mendelian randomization.
    VanderWeele TJ; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Cornelis M; Kraft P
    Epidemiology; 2014 May; 25(3):427-35. PubMed ID: 24681576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Instrumental Variable Analyses in Pharmacoepidemiology: What Target Trials Do We Emulate?
    Swanson SA
    Curr Epidemiol Rep; 2017; 4(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 29226066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal null hypotheses of sustained treatment strategies: What can be tested with an instrumental variable?
    Swanson SA; Labrecque J; Hernán MA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 33(8):723-728. PubMed ID: 29721747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates.
    Burgess S; Labrecque JA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 33(10):947-952. PubMed ID: 30039250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two robust tools for inference about causal effects with invalid instruments.
    Kang H; Lee Y; Cai TT; Small DS
    Biometrics; 2022 Mar; 78(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 33616910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity Analyses for Robust Causal Inference from Mendelian Randomization Analyses with Multiple Genetic Variants.
    Burgess S; Bowden J; Fall T; Ingelsson E; Thompson SG
    Epidemiology; 2017 Jan; 28(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 27749700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.