BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30148385)

  • 1. Mechanisms underlying the spacing effect in learning: A comparison of three computational models.
    Walsh MM; Gluck KA; Gunzelmann G; Jastrzembski T; Krusmark M; Myung JI; Pitt MA; Zhou R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Sep; 147(9):1325-1348. PubMed ID: 30148385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relearning attenuates the benefits and costs of spacing.
    Rawson KA; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Nov; 142(4):1113-29. PubMed ID: 23088488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeated testing, item selection, and relearning: the benefits of testing outweigh the costs.
    de Jonge M; Tabbers HK
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 23422656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating and explaining the effects of successive relearning on long-term retention.
    Rawson KA; Vaughn KE; Walsh M; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Mar; 24(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 29431462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distribution of practice effects on learning retention and relearning by retarded boys.
    Chasey WC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Aug; 43(1):159-64. PubMed ID: 958809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spacing of repetitions improves learning and memory after moderate and severe TBI.
    Hillary FG; Schultheis MT; Challis BH; Millis SR; Carnevale GJ; Galshi T; DeLuca J
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Feb; 25(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 12607171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhancing learning and retention through the distribution of practice repetitions across multiple sessions.
    Walsh MM; Krusmark MA; Jastrembski T; Hansen DA; Honn KA; Gunzelmann G
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):455-472. PubMed ID: 36190659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of successive relearning on recall: Does relearning override the effects of initial learning criterion?
    Vaughn KE; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):897-909. PubMed ID: 27027887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the Theoretic Adequacy and Applied Potential of Computational Models of the Spacing Effect.
    Walsh MM; Gluck KA; Gunzelmann G; Jastrzembski T; Krusmark M
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 3():644-691. PubMed ID: 29498437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The spacing effect in immediate and delayed free recall.
    Godbole NR; Delaney PF; Verkoeijen PP
    Memory; 2014; 22(5):462-9. PubMed ID: 23701389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: how much is enough?
    Rawson KA; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Aug; 140(3):283-302. PubMed ID: 21707204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working memory load in the initial learning phase facilitates relearning: a study of vocabulary learning.
    Sasaki T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):317-27. PubMed ID: 18459381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect.
    Smith TA; Kimball DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20053046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Very similar spacing-effect patterns in very different learning/practice domains.
    Kornmeier J; Spitzer M; Sosic-Vasic Z
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e90656. PubMed ID: 24609081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing.
    Karpicke JD; Bauernschmidt A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1250-7. PubMed ID: 21574747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effects of Spacing, Naps, and Fatigue on the Acquisition and Retention of Laparoscopic Skills.
    Spruit EN; Band GPH; van der Heijden KB; Hamming JF
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 27988169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relearn Faster and Retain Longer.
    Mazza S; Gerbier E; Gustin MP; Kasikci Z; Koenig O; Toppino TC; Magnin M
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1321-1330. PubMed ID: 27530500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does mediator use contribute to the spacing effect for cued recall? Critical tests of the mediator hypothesis.
    Morehead K; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA; Bishop M; Pyc MA
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):535-546. PubMed ID: 28978279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximizing students' retention via spaced review: practical guidance from computational models of memory.
    Khajah MM; Lindsey RV; Mozer MC
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):157-69. PubMed ID: 24482341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contracting, equal, and expanding learning schedules: the optimal distribution of learning sessions depends on retention interval.
    Küpper-Tetzel CE; Kapler IV; Wiseheart M
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):729-41. PubMed ID: 24500777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.