These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30148387)
1. False beliefs and confabulation can lead to lasting changes in political attitudes. Strandberg T; Sivén D; Hall L; Johansson P; Pärnamets P J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Sep; 147(9):1382-1399. PubMed ID: 30148387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Depolarizing American voters: Democrats and Republicans are equally susceptible to false attitude feedback. Strandberg T; Olson JA; Hall L; Woods A; Johansson P PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0226799. PubMed ID: 32023249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Politics, moral reasoning and the Defining Issues Test: a reply to Barnett et al. (1995). Emler N; Palmer-Canton E; St James A Br J Soc Psychol; 1998 Dec; 37 ( Pt 4)():457-76. PubMed ID: 9933911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conservative and liberal attitudes drive polarized neural responses to political content. Leong YC; Chen J; Willer R; Zaki J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov; 117(44):27731-27739. PubMed ID: 33082227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The politics of insight. Salvi C; Cristofori I; Grafman J; Beeman M Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(6):1064-72. PubMed ID: 26810954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Privileged Point of View: Effects of Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Naïve Realism and Political Division. Brown-Iannuzzi JL; Lundberg KB; Kay AC; Payne BK Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2021 Feb; 47(2):241-256. PubMed ID: 32458734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How the polls can be both spot on and dead wrong: using choice blindness to shift political attitudes and voter intentions. Hall L; Strandberg T; Pärnamets P; Lind A; Tärning B; Johansson P PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60554. PubMed ID: 23593244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority. Toner K; Leary MR; Asher MW; Jongman-Sereno KP Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2454-62. PubMed ID: 24096379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes. Van Boven L; Judd CM; Sherman DK J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):84-100. PubMed ID: 22545744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ideological asymmetry in the relationship between epistemic motivation and political attitudes. Federico CM; Deason G; Fisher EL J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Sep; 103(3):381-98. PubMed ID: 22731763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intolerance of uncertainty modulates brain-to-brain synchrony during politically polarized perception. van Baar JM; Halpern DJ; FeldmanHall O Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 May; 118(20):. PubMed ID: 33986114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Individual difference factors and beliefs in medical and political conspiracy theories. Galliford N; Furnham A Scand J Psychol; 2017 Oct; 58(5):422-428. PubMed ID: 28782805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Different meanings of the social dominance orientation concept: predicting political attitudes over time. Jetten J; Iyer A Br J Soc Psychol; 2010 Jun; 49(Pt 2):385-404. PubMed ID: 19397844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A single exposure to the American flag shifts support toward Republicanism up to 8 months later. Carter TJ; Ferguson MJ; Hassin RR Psychol Sci; 2011 Aug; 22(8):1011-8. PubMed ID: 21742933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding. Fernbach PM; Rogers T; Fox CR; Sloman SA Psychol Sci; 2013 Jun; 24(6):939-46. PubMed ID: 23620547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A moral house divided: How idealized family models impact political cognition. Feinberg M; Wehling E PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0193347. PubMed ID: 29641618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rethinking the link between cognitive sophistication and politically motivated reasoning. Tappin BM; Pennycook G; Rand DG J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Jun; 150(6):1095-1114. PubMed ID: 33119359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lifting the veil of morality: choice blindness and attitude reversals on a self-transforming survey. Hall L; Johansson P; Strandberg T PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45457. PubMed ID: 23029020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics. Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]