These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30148516)

  • 1. A Standardized Clinical Performance Grading Rubric: Reliability Assessment.
    Kopp ML
    J Nurs Educ; 2018 Sep; 57(9):544-548. PubMed ID: 30148516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Writing Across the Curriculum: Reliability Testing of a Standardized Rubric.
    Minnich M; Kirkpatrick AJ; Goodman JT; Whittaker A; Stanton Chapple H; Schoening AM; Khanna MM
    J Nurs Educ; 2018 Jun; 57(6):366-370. PubMed ID: 29863738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the Clark Simulation Evaluation Rubric with associate degree and baccalaureate nursing students.
    Gantt LT
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2010; 31(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 20455367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and Validation of a Rubric to Evaluate Diabetes SOAP Note Writing in APPE.
    Andrus MR; McDonough SLK; Kelley KW; Stamm PL; McCoy EK; Lisenby KM; Whitley HP; Slater N; Carroll DG; Hester EK; Helmer AM; Jackson CW; Byrd DC
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2018 Nov; 82(9):6725. PubMed ID: 30559501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential Grading of Reflective Writing Between Clinical Instructors and Faculty Type.
    Novotny NL
    J Nurs Educ; 2023 Feb; 62(2):101-104. PubMed ID: 36779903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of an Analytical Grading Rubric for Self-Assessment: A Pilot Study for a Periodontal Oral Competency Examination in Predoctoral Dental Education.
    Satheesh KM; Brockmann LB; Liu Y; Gadbury-Amyot CC
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Dec; 79(12):1429-36. PubMed ID: 26632297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Considerations in the use of reflective writing for student assessment: issues of reliability and validity.
    Moniz T; Arntfield S; Miller K; Lingard L; Watling C; Regehr G
    Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 49(9):901-8. PubMed ID: 26296406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Rubric to Assess Students' Clinical Reasoning When Encountering Virtual Patients.
    Georg C; Karlgren K; Ulfvarson J; Jirwe M; Welin E
    J Nurs Educ; 2018 Jul; 57(7):408-415. PubMed ID: 29958310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring critical thinking in pre-registration midwifery students: A multi-method approach.
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Feb; 61():169-174. PubMed ID: 29216601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reliability characteristics of the REFLECT rubric for assessing reflective capacity through expressive writing assignments: A replication study.
    Grierson L; Winemaker S; Taniguchi A; Howard M; Marshall D; Zazulak J
    Perspect Med Educ; 2020 Oct; 9(5):281-285. PubMed ID: 32803530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of the Simulation-Positive Learning Evaluation (SIM-PLE) rubric for use in medical-surgical nursing high fidelity simulations.
    Lee E; Mabry JL; Roberts T; Davis KM
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2021 Feb; 51():102992. PubMed ID: 33636488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Critical thinking evaluation in reflective writing: Development and testing of Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Reflection).
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Midwifery; 2017 Nov; 54():73-80. PubMed ID: 28866350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating Interrater Reliability in an Online RN-to-BSN Program: Disparate Conclusions.
    Kilanowski JF; Abbott MB
    J Nurs Educ; 2017 Jun; 56(6):360-363. PubMed ID: 28585985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the Correlation Between Nontraditional Variables and Student Success: A Longitudinal Study.
    Strickland HP; Cheshire MH
    J Nurs Educ; 2017 Jun; 56(6):351-355. PubMed ID: 28585983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of a grading rubric designed to evaluate the reflective ability of predoctoral dental students.
    Heathman AK; Mitchell TV; Van Ness CJ; Godley LW; Ehrenberger CJ; Wendland ME; Gadbury-Amyot CC
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2021 Nov; 25(4):664-669. PubMed ID: 33314572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic online peer evaluations to improve group assignments in nursing e-learning environment.
    Adwan J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2016 Jun; 41():67-72. PubMed ID: 27138485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of audio vs. written feedback on clinical assignments of nursing students.
    Bourgault AM; Mundy C; Joshua T
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2013; 34(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 23586205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applying a validated scoring rubric to pre-clerkship medical students' standardized patient notes: a pilot study.
    Gallagher BD; Green ML; Talwalkar JS
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Jul; 23(1):504. PubMed ID: 37438775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a method to assess digitally recorded surgical skills of novice veterinary students.
    Williamson JA; Farrell R; Skowron C; Brisson BA; Anderson S; Spangler D; Johnson J
    Vet Surg; 2018 Apr; 47(3):378-384. PubMed ID: 29380866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Student-Produced Video to Validate Head-to-Toe Assessment Performance.
    Purpora C; Prion S
    J Nurs Educ; 2018 Mar; 57(3):154-158. PubMed ID: 29505073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.