These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30148808)

  • 1. Development of AN On-site, Rapid, Environmental Radiation-distribution Monitoring System for Decision Making during a Radiation Emergency.
    Lee U; Kim HR
    Health Phys; 2018 Oct; 115(4):422-431. PubMed ID: 30148808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmental gamma radiation analysis for Ulsan city with the highest nuclear power plant density in Korea.
    Lee U; Bae JW; Kim HR
    J Environ Radioact; 2017 Nov; 178-179():177-185. PubMed ID: 28850883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lessons Learned from the Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant-More than Basic Knowledge: Education and its Effects Improve the Preparedness and Response to Radiation Emergency.
    Hachiya M; Akashi M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 27466457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose Estimation in Recycling of Decontamination Soil Resulting From The Fukushima NPS Accident For Road Embankments.
    Takai S; Sawaguchi T; Takeda S
    Health Phys; 2018 Oct; 115(4):439-447. PubMed ID: 30148809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Organization of the nuclear emergency plan].
    Van Bladel L; Vandecasteele C
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):337-40. PubMed ID: 16408829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introduction: off-site nuclear emergency management--capabilities and challenges.
    Hohenberg JK; Kelly N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):1. PubMed ID: 15238647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ESTE-DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR NUCLEAR AND RADIOLOGICAL ACCIDENTS.
    Fojcíková E; Lipták Ľ; Krpelanová M; Chylý M; Čarný P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 186(2-3):321-325. PubMed ID: 31711210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. INDIVIDUAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AFTER MAJOR RELEASES OF RADIONUCLIDES TO THE ENVIRONMENT.
    Berkovski V; Ratia G; Bonchuk Y
    Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol; 2018 Dec; 23():37-48. PubMed ID: 30582835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tools for placing the radiological health hazard in perspective following a severe emergency at a light water reactor (LWR) or its spent fuel pool.
    McKenna T; Welter PV; Callen J; Martincic R; Dodd B; Kutkov V
    Health Phys; 2015 Jan; 108(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 25437516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response in the late phase to a radiological emergency.
    Morrey M; Nisbet A; Thome D; Savkin M; Hoe S; Brynildsen L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):89-96. PubMed ID: 15238663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decontamination work in the area surrounding Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant: another occupational health challenge of the nuclear disaster.
    Wada K; Yoshikawa T; Murata M
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2012; 67(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 22845725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Saving Lives and Preventing Injuries From Unjustified Protective Actions-Method for Developing a Comprehensive Public Protective Action Strategy for a Severe NPP Emergency.
    Callen J; McKenna T
    Health Phys; 2018 May; 114(5):511-526. PubMed ID: 29578899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SPRINT: a tool for probabilistic source term prediction for use with decision support systems.
    Grindon E; Kinniburgh CG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):35-9. PubMed ID: 15238653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A critical evaluation of the strategy project.
    Howard BJ; Liland A; Beresford NA; Andersson KG; Cox G; Gil JM; Hunt J; Nisbet A; Oughton DH; Voigt G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):63-7. PubMed ID: 15238658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protective actions in the late phase--intervention criteria and decision-making.
    Hedemann-Jensen P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):45-51. PubMed ID: 15238655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents?
    Ingram RJ
    Health Phys; 2018 Feb; 114(2):208-213. PubMed ID: 30086017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation monitoring strategy: factors to be considered.
    Lahtinen J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):79-82. PubMed ID: 15238661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Off-site nuclear emergency management-capabilities and challenges. Proceedings of an international symposium. September 29- October 3, 2003. Salzburg, Austria.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):1-172. PubMed ID: 15238678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An analytical approach to γ-ray self-shielding effects for radioactive bodies encountered nuclear decommissioning scenarios.
    Gamage KA; Joyce MJ
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2011 Oct; 69(10):1521-32. PubMed ID: 21723136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.