These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30148808)

  • 21. International exchange of emergency phase information and assessments: an aid to national/international decision makers.
    Sullivan TJ; Chino M; Ehrhardt J; Shershakov V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):133-6. PubMed ID: 15238671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Emergency management in the early phase.
    Crick M; McKenna T; Buglova E; Winkler G; Martincic R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):7-17. PubMed ID: 15238649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lessons learnt from the radiological measures performed by the Radiological Emergency Network of Extremadura in the International Emergency Exercise CURIEX 2013.
    Baeza A; Corbacho JA; Caballero JM; Ontalba MA; Valencia D; Vasco J; Gil JM
    J Radiol Prot; 2016 Sep; 36(3):616-628. PubMed ID: 27485467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiation disaster response: preparation and simulation experience at an academic medical center.
    Schleipman AR; Gerbaudo VH; Castronovo FP
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2004 Mar; 32(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 14990671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is there a need for hydrological modelling in decision support systems for nuclear emergencies.
    Raskob W; Heling R; Zheleznyak M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):111-4. PubMed ID: 15238667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enhancing nuclear emergency response through international cooperation.
    Ugletveit F; Aaltonen H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):147-8. PubMed ID: 15238674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ongoing efforts to improve the international nuclear and radiological emergency response.
    Ugletveit F; Molhoek W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):149-50. PubMed ID: 15238675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Action levels for automatic gamma-measurements based on probabilistic radionuclide transport calculations.
    Lauritzen B; Hedemann-Jensen P
    J Radiol Prot; 2005 Dec; 25(4):417-34. PubMed ID: 16340070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An improved method for the non-destructive characterization of radioactive waste by gamma scanning.
    Bai YF; Mauerhofer E; Wang DZ; Odoj R
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Oct; 67(10):1897-903. PubMed ID: 19540769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. DEVELOPMENT OF A NATIONAL EMERGENCY PLAN FOR MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS AND THERAPY OF DETERMINISTIC EFFECTS AFTER RADIATION ACCIDENTS.
    Ziegler A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 27574320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Information and interaction with the public.
    Grlicarev I; Stritar A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):41-4. PubMed ID: 15238654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Communication of radiation benefits and risks in decision making: some lessons learned.
    Locke PA
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):626-9. PubMed ID: 21979551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Protecting Public Health in Nuclear Emergencies-the Need to Broaden the Process.
    Carr Z; Weiss W; Roebbel N; Abrahams J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):163-7. PubMed ID: 27542815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Medical response to a major radiologic emergency: a primer for medical and public health practitioners.
    Wolbarst AB; Wiley AL; Nemhauser JB; Christensen DM; Hendee WR
    Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):660-77. PubMed ID: 20177084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Anatomy of and lessons learned from a Canadian national-scale radiological exercise: ExIT-08.
    Kramer GH; Beaton D; Tenney A; Hauck B; Capello K; Quayle D
    Health Phys; 2009 May; 96(5 Suppl 2):S55-63. PubMed ID: 19359843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Austria-Czech Republic co-operation in the field of radiation-emergency preparedness.
    Prouza Z; Drabova D; Moltasova J; Hohenberg JK; Hofer P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):105-10. PubMed ID: 15238666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Key sources of imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments.
    Haywood SM
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 18495989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A United States perspective on long-term management of areas contaminated with radioactive materials.
    Jones CR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):75-7. PubMed ID: 15238660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preparedness for radiological emergency situations in Austria.
    Ditto M
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2012 Feb; 162(3-4):55-9. PubMed ID: 22476593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiation fields and dose assessments in Korean nuclear power plants.
    Kim HG; Kong TY; Jeong WT; Kim ST
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):136-9. PubMed ID: 21498858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.