168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30148810)
1. Comparison of U.S. NRC'S Rascal Emergency Response Code with Noaa's Hyrad Dispersion Model and Tracer Experimental Data.
Abbott ML
Health Phys; 2018 Oct; 115(4):448-457. PubMed ID: 30148810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictions of dispersion and deposition of fallout from nuclear testing using the NOAA-HYSPLIT meteorological model.
Moroz BE; Beck HL; Bouville A; Simon SL
Health Phys; 2010 Aug; 99(2):252-69. PubMed ID: 20622555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modeling the fallout from stabilized nuclear clouds using the HYSPLIT atmospheric dispersion model.
Rolph GD; Ngan F; Draxler RR
J Environ Radioact; 2014 Oct; 136():41-55. PubMed ID: 24878719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A study of the atmospheric dispersion of a high release of krypton-85 above a complex coastal terrain, comparison with the predictions of Gaussian models (Briggs, Doury, ADMS4).
Leroy C; Maro D; Hébert D; Solier L; Rozet M; Le Cavelier S; Connan O
J Environ Radioact; 2010 Nov; 101(11):937-44. PubMed ID: 20638159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atmospheric plume progression as a function of time and distance from the release point for radioactive isotopes.
Eslinger PW; Bowyer TW; Cameron IM; Hayes JC; Miley HS
J Environ Radioact; 2015 Oct; 148():123-9. PubMed ID: 26151301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of a Kalman filter based method for on-line estimation of atmospheric dispersion parameters using radiation monitoring data.
Drews M; Lauritzen B; Madsen H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(1):75-89. PubMed ID: 15572402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kalman filtration of radiation monitoring data from atmospheric dispersion of radioactive materials.
Drews M; Lauritzen B; Madsen H; Smith JQ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 15266085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An attempt for modeling the atmospheric transport of 3H around Kakrapar Atomic Power Station.
Patra AK; Nankar DP; Joshi CP; Venkataraman S; Sundar D; Hegde AG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 18664562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atmospheric transport of radioactive debris to Norway in case of a hypothetical accident related to the recovery of the Russian submarine K-27.
Bartnicki J; Amundsen I; Brown J; Hosseini A; Hov Ø; Haakenstad H; Klein H; Lind OC; Salbu B; Szacinski Wendel CC; Ytre-Eide MA
J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 2():404-16. PubMed ID: 25804322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mid-range atmospheric dispersion modelling. Intercomparison of simple models in EMRAS-2 project.
Periáñez R; Thiessen KM; Chouhan SL; Mancini F; Navarro E; Sdouz G; Trifunović D
J Environ Radioact; 2016 Oct; 162-163():225-234. PubMed ID: 27267160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Method for estimating ingestion doses to the public near the Savannah River site following an accidental atmospheric release.
Simpkins AA
Health Phys; 2005 Feb; 88(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 15650588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of the source rate released into the environment from a nuclear power plant.
Jeong HJ; Kim EH; Suh KS; Hwang WT; Han MH; Lee HK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 15687109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental evaluation of gamma fluence-rate predictions from Argon-41 releases to the atmosphere over a nuclear research reactor site.
Rojas-Palma C; Aage HK; Astrup P; Bargholz K; Drews M; Jørgensen HE; Korsbech U; Lauritzen B; Mikkelsen T; Thykier-Nielsen S; Van Ammel R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 14978295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Study on enhanced atmospheric dispersion of 41Ar at the Trombay site.
Chatterjee MK; Divkar JK; Patil SS; Singh R; Pradeepkumar KS; Sharma DN
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Aug; 155(4):483-96. PubMed ID: 23413091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of NCRP air screening factors for evaluating both routine and episodic radionuclide releases to the atmosphere.
Mohler HJ; Meyer KR; Grogan HA; Aanenson JW; Till JE
Health Phys; 2004 Feb; 86(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 14744046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simulation of radioactive plume gamma dose over a complex terrain using Lagrangian particle dispersion model.
Rakesh PT; Venkatesan R; Hedde T; Roubin P; Baskaran R; Venkatraman B
J Environ Radioact; 2015 Jul; 145():30-39. PubMed ID: 25863323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Examination of the uncertainty in air concentration predictions using Hanford field data.
Miller CW; Fields DE; Cotter SJ
Health Phys; 1988 Aug; 55(2):443-50. PubMed ID: 3410717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dry deposition of 88Rb and 138Cs from a boiling water reactor plume.
Nielsen SP; Gryning SE; Karlberg O; Lyck E; Thykier-Nielsen S
Health Phys; 1990 Mar; 58(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 2312294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation test for CAP88 predictions of tritium dispersion at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Michelotti E; Green A; Whicker J; Eisele W; Fuehne D; McNaughton M
Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S176-81. PubMed ID: 23803672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental levels of radioactivity at Atomic Energy Commission installations. 1. National Reactor Testing Station, January-December 1970. 2. Oak Ridge area, July-December 1970.
Radiat Data Rep; 1973 Dec; 14(12):762-74. PubMed ID: 4801388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
