These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30149263)

  • 1. Readability of online material related to skin cancer.
    Basch CH; Fera J; Ethan D; Garcia P; Perin D; Basch CE
    Public Health; 2018 Oct; 163():137-140. PubMed ID: 30149263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Basch CH; Ethan D; MacLean SA; Fera J; Garcia P; Basch CE
    Am J Mens Health; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1665-1669. PubMed ID: 29888641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Readability of influenza information online: Implications for consumer health.
    Basch CH; Fera J; Garcia P
    Am J Infect Control; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1298-1301. PubMed ID: 31253552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
    Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preeclampsia information on the internet: An application of five readability tests.
    Samuel L; Fera J; Basch CH
    Pregnancy Hypertens; 2022 Dec; 30():110-112. PubMed ID: 36155112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality and readability of online information on ankylosing spondylitis.
    Kocyigit BF; Koca TT; Akaltun MS
    Clin Rheumatol; 2019 Nov; 38(11):3269-3274. PubMed ID: 31372852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Voice Disorders.
    Dueppen AJ; Bellon-Harn ML; Radhakrishnan N; Manchaiah V
    J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 29254598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Readability of online patient-based information on bariatric surgery.
    Meleo-Erwin Z; Basch C; Fera J; Ethan D; Garcia P
    Health Promot Perspect; 2019; 9(2):156-160. PubMed ID: 31249804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for aphasia.
    Azios JH; Bellon-Harn M; Dockens AL; Manchaiah V
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2019 Feb; 21(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28805470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An assessment of the readability of online material related to fluoride.
    Basch CH; Ethan D; Cadorett V; Kollia B; Clark A
    J Prev Interv Community; 2019; 47(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 30806197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Online Patient Resources for Liposuction: A Comparative Analysis of Readability.
    Vargas CR; Ricci JA; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Mar; 76(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 25695442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.
    Weiss KD; Vargas CR; Ho OA; Chuang DJ; Weiss J; Lee BT
    J Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 206(1):90-97. PubMed ID: 27916381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.
    Mozafarpour S; Norris B; Borin J; Eisner BH
    World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):985-992. PubMed ID: 29435639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability of websites containing information about prostate cancer treatment options.
    Ellimoottil C; Polcari A; Kadlec A; Gupta G
    J Urol; 2012 Dec; 188(6):2171-5. PubMed ID: 23083852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating breast cancer websites targeting Arabic speakers: empirical investigation of popularity, availability, accessibility, readability, and quality.
    Jasem Z; AlMeraj Z; Alhuwail D
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 May; 22(1):126. PubMed ID: 35534816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are English-language online patient education materials related to breast cancer risk assessment understandable, readable, and actionable?
    Lamb LR; Baird GL; Roy IT; Choi PHS; Lehman CD; Miles RC
    Breast; 2022 Feb; 61():29-34. PubMed ID: 34894464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability evaluation of Internet-based patient education materials related to the anesthesiology field.
    De Oliveira GS; Jung M; Mccaffery KJ; McCarthy RJ; Wolf MS
    J Clin Anesth; 2015 Aug; 27(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 25912728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy.
    McInnes N; Haglund BJ
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2011 Dec; 36(4):173-89. PubMed ID: 21332302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
    Kong KA; Hu A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the quality and readability of online information about breast cancer in China.
    Li Y; Zhou X; Zhou Y; Mao F; Shen S; Lin Y; Zhang X; Chang TH; Sun Q
    Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Apr; 104(4):858-864. PubMed ID: 32988687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.