242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30149398)
1. [The Case Register for Coercive Measures According to the Law on Assistance for Persons with Mental Diseases of Baden-Wuerttemberg: Conception and First Evaluation].
Flammer E; Steinert T
Psychiatr Prax; 2019 Mar; 46(2):82-89. PubMed ID: 30149398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Effects of the Decision of the German Constitutional Court on mechanical restraint in 2018 : Coercive measures in the psychiatric hospitals in Baden-Wuerttemberg in 2019 compared to the years 2015-2017].
Steinert T; Hirsch S; Flammer E
Nervenarzt; 2022 Jul; 93(7):706-712. PubMed ID: 35303128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Freedom Restrictive Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatry.
Flammer E; Frank U; Steinert T
Front Psychiatry; 2020; 11():146. PubMed ID: 32194460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduction of coercive measures under routine conditions in psychiatric hospitals 2004-2019: Strong effects in old age psychiatry, much less in general psychiatry.
Steinert T; Hirsch S; Goebel R; Snellgrove B; Flammer E
Eur Psychiatry; 2020 Nov; 63(1):e102. PubMed ID: 33213539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increase in coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Flammer E; Eisele F; Hirsch S; Steinert T
PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0264046. PubMed ID: 36044407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of the introduction of immediate judge's decisions in 2018 on the use of coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany: a population-based study.
Flammer E; Hirsch S; Steinert T
Lancet Reg Health Eur; 2021 Dec; 11():100233. PubMed ID: 34778858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Recording and reducing coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals].
Steinert T; Baur M;
Psychiatr Prax; 2004 Nov; 31 Suppl 1():S18-20. PubMed ID: 15570489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association Between Restriction of Involuntary Medication and Frequency of Coercive Measures and Violent Incidents.
Flammer E; Steinert T
Psychiatr Serv; 2016 Dec; 67(12):1315-1320. PubMed ID: 27476807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures.
Janssen WA; van de Sande R; Noorthoorn EO; Nijman HL; Bowers L; Mulder CL; Smit A; Widdershoven GA; Steinert T
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(6):429-38. PubMed ID: 22079087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Benchmarking of freedom-restricting coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals].
Steinert T;
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 21767794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Coercive measures in psychiatric clinics in Germany: current practice (2012)].
Steinert T; Schmid P;
Nervenarzt; 2014 May; 85(5):621-9. PubMed ID: 23979363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Impact of the Temporaneous Lack of Legal Basis for Involuntary Treatment on the Frequency of Aggressive Incidents, Seclusion and Restraint among Patients with Chronic Schizophrenic Disorders].
Flammer E; Steinert T
Psychiatr Prax; 2015 Jul; 42(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 24858428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlates of seclusion and restraint of patients admitted to psychiatric inpatient treatment via a German emergency room.
Cole C; Vandamme A; Bermpohl F; Czernin K; Wullschleger A; Mahler L
J Psychiatr Res; 2020 Nov; 130():201-206. PubMed ID: 32829167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical course and prevalence of coercive measures: an observational study among involuntarily hospitalised psychiatric patients.
Hotzy F; Moetteli S; Theodoridou A; Schneeberger AR; Seifritz E; Hoff P; Jäger M
Swiss Med Wkly; 2018; 148():w14616. PubMed ID: 29698543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Documentation, Application and Efforts to Reduce Involuntary Admissions and Coercive Measures - Results from a Nationwide Study on Acute Psychiatric Hospitals in Germany].
Efkemann SA; Haußleiter IS; Steinert T; Hoffmann K; Juckel G
Psychiatr Prax; 2022 Oct; 49(7):345-351. PubMed ID: 35595493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Socio-economic impact on involuntary admissions and coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany.
Efkemann SA; Ueberberg B; Haußleiter IS; Hoffmann K; Juckel G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 71():101597. PubMed ID: 32768099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One-year incidence and prevalence of seclusion: Dutch findings in an international perspective.
Noorthoorn E; Lepping P; Janssen W; Hoogendoorn A; Nijman H; Widdershoven G; Steinert T
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 50(12):1857-69. PubMed ID: 26188503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Involuntary Medication, Seclusion, and Restraint in German Psychiatric Hospitals after the Adoption of Legislation in 2013.
Flammer E; Steinert T
Front Psychiatry; 2015; 6():153. PubMed ID: 26578985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating costs of bedside assessment by a judge in each case of mechanical restraint in Germany after new legislation.
Hirsch S; Flammer E; Steinert T
Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1291130. PubMed ID: 38260786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Seclusion, restraint, and involuntary medication in Finnish psychiatric care: a register study with root-level data.
Laukkanen E; Kuosmanen L; Selander T; Vehviläinen-Julkunen K
Nord J Psychiatry; 2020 Aug; 74(6):439-443. PubMed ID: 32125209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
