These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30150030)

  • 1. Effects of reconstruction technique on the quality of abdominal CT angiography: A comparison between forward projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) and conventional reconstruction methods.
    Wu R; Hori M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Fukui H; Ota T; Nishida T; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():100-105. PubMed ID: 30150030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of contrast enhancement boost postprocessing technique in combination with different reconstruction algorithms on the image quality of abdominal CT angiography.
    Xu J; Wang S; Wang X; Wang Y; Xue H; Yan J; Xu M; Jin Z
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 154():110388. PubMed ID: 35714492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
    Matsuki M; Murakami T; Juri H; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D integrated with automatic tube current modulation in radiation dose and image noise reduction compared with filtered-back projection for 80-kVp abdominal CT: Anthropomorphic phantom and patient study.
    Chen CM; Lin YY; Hsu MY; Hung CF; Liao YL; Tsai HY
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 27501904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT.
    Singh R; Digumarthy SR; Muse VV; Kambadakone AR; Blake MA; Tabari A; Hoi Y; Akino N; Angel E; Madan R; Kalra MK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):566-573. PubMed ID: 31967501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation dose reduction in cardiovascular CT angiography with iterative reconstruction (AIDR 3D) in a swine model: a model of paediatric cardiac imaging.
    Zhao P; Hou Y; Liu Q; Ma Y; Guo Q
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Jul; 71(7):716.e7-716.e14. PubMed ID: 27180082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Different Levels of Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D on Image Quality of 320-Row Coronary CT Angiography: A Clinical Trial.
    Feger S; Rief M; Zimmermann E; Martus P; Schuijf JD; Blobel J; Richter F; Dewey M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125943. PubMed ID: 25945924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effect of Deep Learning-based Contrast-enhanced CT Image Reconstruction on the Image Quality of the Biliary System].
    Wang ST; Xu J; Wang X; Wang Y; Xue HD; Jin ZY
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2022 Aug; 44(4):614-620. PubMed ID: 36065694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D and filtered back projection in craniocervical CT angiography.
    Yu S; Zhang L; Zheng J; Xu Y; Chen Y; Song Z
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):96.e1-96.e6. PubMed ID: 27647546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standard dose versus low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT: comparison between filtered back projection versus adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.
    Gervaise A; Osemont B; Louis M; Lecocq S; Teixeira P; Blum A
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Jan; 95(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23988483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image quality of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D of coronary CT angiography of 640-slice CT: comparison with filtered back-projection.
    Yoo RE; Park EA; Lee W; Shim H; Kim YK; Chung JW; Park JH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Mar; 29(3):669-76. PubMed ID: 22923280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image Quality of CT Angiography of Supra-Aortic Arteries : Comparison Between Advanced Modelled Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE), Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) and Filtered Back Projection (FBP) in One Patients' Group.
    Örgel A; Bier G; Hennersdorf F; Richter H; Ernemann U; Hauser TK
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2020 Mar; 30(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30397728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computed Tomography Image Quality Evaluation of a New Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in the Abdomen (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V) a Comparison With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection Reconstructions.
    Goodenberger MH; Wagner-Bartak NA; Gupta S; Liu X; Yap RQ; Sun J; Tamm EP; Jensen CT
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 28806318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm in CT: effect on image quality compared with filtered back projection in body phantoms of different sizes.
    Kim M; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Son H; Choi JW; Han JK; Choi BI
    Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 24644409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Son SS; Choo KS; Jeon UB; Jeon GR; Nam KJ; Kim TU; Yeom JA; Hwang JY; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():31-8. PubMed ID: 25414055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Kim D; Cho J; Kim S; Lee S; Lee J
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150463. PubMed ID: 26234823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of iterative reconstruction vs. filtered back projection on image quality in 320-slice CT coronary angiography: Insights from the CORE320 multicenter study.
    Fareed A; Vavere AL; Zimmermann E; Tanami Y; Steveson C; Matheson M; Paul N; Clouse M; Cox C; Lima JAC; Arbab-Zadeh A
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(48):e8452. PubMed ID: 29310329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.