These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

612 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30150047)

  • 1. Effect of integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population screening trial: A descriptive study.
    Bernardi D; Li T; Pellegrini M; Macaskill P; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Houssami N
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():26-31. PubMed ID: 30150047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of integrating 3D-mammography (digital breast tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population breast screening trial.
    Bernardi D; Caumo F; Macaskill P; Ciatto S; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 May; 50(7):1232-8. PubMed ID: 24582915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast cancer detection using single-reading of breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) compared to double-reading of 2D-mammography: Evidence from a population-based trial.
    Houssami N; Bernardi D; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Macaskill P
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 47():94-99. PubMed ID: 28192742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for single-reading or double-reading--evidence to guide future screening strategies.
    Houssami N; Macaskill P; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jul; 50(10):1799-1807. PubMed ID: 24746887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiologists' interpretive efficiency and variability in true- and false-positive detection when screen-reading with tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) relative to standard mammography in population screening.
    Svahn TM; Macaskill P; Houssami N
    Breast; 2015 Dec; 24(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 26433751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.
    Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Houssami N
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Aug; 17(8):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 27345635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incremental effect from integrating 3D-mammography (tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography: Increased breast cancer detection evident for screening centres in a population-based trial.
    Caumo F; Bernardi D; Ciatto S; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
    Breast; 2014 Feb; 23(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24316152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast cancers detected in only one of two arms of a tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) population screening trial (STORM-2).
    Bernardi D; Houssami N
    Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():98-101. PubMed ID: 28107735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Gullien R; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Izadi M; Jebsen IN; Jahr G; Krager M; Hofvind S
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2061-71. PubMed ID: 23553585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: A pictorial review of screen-detected cancers and false recalls attributed to tomosynthesis in prospective screening trials.
    Houssami N; Lång K; Bernardi D; Tagliafico A; Zackrisson S; Skaane P
    Breast; 2016 Apr; 26():119-34. PubMed ID: 27017251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interval breast cancers in the 'screening with tomosynthesis or standard mammography' (STORM) population-based trial.
    Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Brunelli S; Fantò C; Valentini M; Romanucci G; Gentilini MA; Zorzi M; Macaskill P
    Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():150-153. PubMed ID: 29328943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading.
    Skaane P; Østerås BH; Yanakiev S; Lie T; Eben EB; Gullien R; Brandal SHB
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3912-3923. PubMed ID: 37938385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2).
    Tagliafico AS; Mariscotti G; Valdora F; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Sormani MP; Signori A; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():39-46. PubMed ID: 30316869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pilot trial of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D mammography) for population-based screening in BreastScreen Victoria.
    Houssami N; Lockie D; Clemson M; Pridmore V; Taylor D; Marr G; Evans J; Macaskill P
    Med J Aust; 2019 Oct; 211(8):357-362. PubMed ID: 31448816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time.
    Bernardi D; Ciatto S; Pellegrini M; Anesi V; Burlon S; Cauli E; Depaoli M; Larentis L; Malesani V; Targa L; Baldo P; Houssami N
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 85(1020):e1174-8. PubMed ID: 23175484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence on Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Versus Digital Mammography When Using Tomosynthesis (Three-dimensional Mammography) for Population Breast Cancer Screening.
    Houssami N
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):255-260.e1. PubMed ID: 29066138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective study aiming to compare 2D mammography and tomosynthesis + synthesized mammography in terms of cancer detection and recall. From double reading of 2D mammography to single reading of tomosynthesis.
    Romero Martín S; Raya Povedano JL; Cara García M; Santos Romero AL; Pedrosa Garriguet M; Álvarez Benito M
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2484-2491. PubMed ID: 29294150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.