317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30150051)
1. Effectiveness of a new radiation protection system in the interventional radiology setting.
Etzel R; König AM; Keil B; Fiebich M; Mahnken AH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():56-61. PubMed ID: 30150051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protective Efficacy of Different Ocular Radiation Protection Devices: A Phantom Study.
Koenig AM; Etzel R; Greger W; Viniol S; Fiebich M; Thomas RP; Mahnken AH
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2020 Jan; 43(1):127-134. PubMed ID: 31489475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scatter radiation reduction with a radiation-absorbing pad in interventional radiology examinations.
Koenig AM; Maas J; Viniol S; Etzel R; Fiebich M; Thomas RP; Mahnken AH
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 132():109245. PubMed ID: 33011604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Should We Keep the Lead in the Aprons?
Bartal G; Sailer AM; Vano E
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Mar; 21(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 29471995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Live Without Regret.
Marx MV
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Mar; 21(1):1. PubMed ID: 29471993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing strategies for operator eye protection in the interventional radiology suite.
Thornton RH; Dauer LT; Altamirano JP; Alvarado KJ; St Germain J; Solomon SB
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1703-7. PubMed ID: 20920841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduction of occupational radiation dose in staff at the cardiac catheterisation laboratory by protective material placed on the patient.
Ordiales JM; Nogales JM; Sánchez-Casanueva R; Vano E; Fernández JM; Álvarez FJ; Ramos J; Martínez G; López-Mínguez JR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):272-5. PubMed ID: 25848096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical Evaluation of Protective Garments with Respect to Garment Characteristics and Manufacturer Label Information.
Lichliter A; Weir V; Heithaus RE; Gipson S; Syed A; West J; Rees C
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 27789076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Get the Lead off Our Backs!
Rees CR; Duncan BWC
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Mar; 21(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 29472000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike.
Fakhoury E; Provencher JA; Subramaniam R; Finlay DJ
J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):246-250. PubMed ID: 30292602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel radiation protection device based on tungsten functional paper for application in interventional radiology.
Monzen H; Tamura M; Shimomura K; Onishi Y; Nakayama S; Fujimoto T; Matsumoto K; Hanaoka K; Kamomae T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 May; 18(3):215-220. PubMed ID: 28422397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Head and Neck Radiation Dose and Radiation Safety for Interventional Physicians.
Fetterly K; Schueler B; Grams M; Sturchio G; Bell M; Gulati R
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(5):520-528. PubMed ID: 28279321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A New Design of a Lead-Acrylic Shield for Staff Dose Reduction in Radial and Femoral Access Coronary Catheterization.
Eder H; Seidenbusch MC; Treitl M; Gilligan P
Rofo; 2015 Oct; 187(10):915-23. PubMed ID: 26085177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of angiography table shields and height on patient and angiographer irradiation during interventional radiology procedures.
d'Othée BJ; Lin PJ
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 17278031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reduction of Operator Hand Exposure in Interventional Radiology With a Novel Finger Sack Using Tungsten-containing Rubber.
Kosaka H; Monzen H; Matsumoto K; Tamura M; Nishimura Y
Health Phys; 2019 May; 116(5):625-630. PubMed ID: 30688684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Types and arrangement of thyroid shields to reduce exposure of surgeons to ionizing radiation during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy.
Lee SY; Min E; Bae J; Chung CY; Lee KM; Kwon SS; Park MS; Lee K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(24):2108-12. PubMed ID: 23963017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist.
Marichal DA; Anwar T; Kirsch D; Clements J; Carlson L; Savage C; Rees CR
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 21354818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of an additional lead shielding device in reducing occupational radiation exposure during interventional endoscopic procedures: An observational study.
Yamada R; Saimyo Y; Tanaka K; Hattori A; Umeda Y; Kuroda N; Tsuboi J; Hamada Y; Takei Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Aug; 99(34):e21831. PubMed ID: 32846829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is lead shielding of patients necessary during fluoroscopic procedures? A study based on kyphoplasty.
Smith JR; Marsh RM; Silosky MS
Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 28821928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the occupational exposure in real time during interventional cardiology procedures.
Baptista M; Figueira C; Teles P; Cardoso G; Zankl M; Vaz P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25848113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
