These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30150223)

  • 1. Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions.
    Li XY; Holman L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 373(1757):. PubMed ID: 30150223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.
    Bussière LF; Hunt J; Stölting KN; Jennions MD; Brooks R
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17987390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cryptic sex-ratio bias provides indirect genetic benefits despite sexual conflict.
    Cox RM; Calsbeek R
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5974):92-4. PubMed ID: 20203012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct benefits of choosing a high-fitness mate can offset the indirect costs associated with intralocus sexual conflict.
    Pischedda A; Chippindale AK
    Evolution; 2017 Jun; 71(6):1710-1718. PubMed ID: 28369895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intralocus sexual conflict.
    van Doorn GS
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1168():52-71. PubMed ID: 19566703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexually antagonistic selection on genetic variation underlying both male and female same-sex sexual behavior.
    Berger D; You T; Minano MR; Grieshop K; Lind MI; Arnqvist G; Maklakov AA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 May; 16():88. PubMed ID: 27175796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual selection, phenotypic plasticity and female reproductive output.
    Fox RJ; Fromhage L; Jennions MD
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 374(1768):20180184. PubMed ID: 30966965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intralocus sexual conflict and environmental stress.
    Berger D; Grieshop K; Lind MI; Goenaga J; Maklakov AA; Arnqvist G
    Evolution; 2014 Aug; 68(8):2184-96. PubMed ID: 24766035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The geography of sex: sexual conflict, environmental gradients and local loss of sex in facultatively parthenogenetic animals.
    Burke NW; Bonduriansky R
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 373(1757):. PubMed ID: 30150220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intralocus sexual conflict, adaptive sex allocation, and the heritability of fitness.
    Calsbeek R; Duryea MC; Goedert D; Bergeron P; Cox RM
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Nov; 28(11):1975-85. PubMed ID: 26310599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evolution of costly mate choice against segregation distorters.
    Manser A; Lindholm AK; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2017 Dec; 71(12):2817-2828. PubMed ID: 29071709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The sexual selection continuum.
    Kokko H; Brooks R; McNamara JM; Houston AI
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jul; 269(1498):1331-40. PubMed ID: 12079655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Parker GA; Partridge L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The consequences of sexual selection in well-adapted and maladapted populations of bean beetles†.
    Martinossi-Allibert I; Savković U; Đorđević M; Arnqvist G; Stojković B; Berger D
    Evolution; 2018 Mar; 72(3):518-530. PubMed ID: 29238970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex-specific selection under environmental stress in seed beetles.
    Martinossi-Allibert I; Arnqvist G; Berger D
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Jan; 30(1):161-173. PubMed ID: 27749005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection.
    Pischedda A; Chippindale AK
    PLoS Biol; 2006 Nov; 4(11):e356. PubMed ID: 17105343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Veiled preferences and cryptic female choice could underlie the origin of novel sexual traits.
    Moehring AJ; Boughman JW
    Biol Lett; 2019 Feb; 15(2):20180878. PubMed ID: 30958124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects.
    Miller CW; Moore AJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1279-86. PubMed ID: 17341455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual conflict and environmental change: trade-offs within and between the sexes during the evolution of desiccation resistance.
    Kwan L; Bedhomme S; Prasad NG; Chippindale AK
    J Genet; 2008 Dec; 87(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 19147928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intralocus sexual conflict unresolved by sex-limited trait expression.
    Harano T; Okada K; Nakayama S; Miyatake T; Hosken DJ
    Curr Biol; 2010 Nov; 20(22):2036-9. PubMed ID: 21055943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.