These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30150223)

  • 21. The interaction between sex-specific selection and local adaptation in species without separate sexes.
    Olito C; Abbott JK; Jordan CY
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 373(1757):. PubMed ID: 30150224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intralocus sexual conflict for fitness: sexually antagonistic alleles for testosterone.
    Mills SC; Koskela E; Mappes T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 May; 279(1735):1889-95. PubMed ID: 22171083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genotype × Environment interaction and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: adult nutritional environment mediates selection and expression of sex-specific genetic variance in Drosophila melanogaster.
    De Lisle SP
    J Evol Biol; 2024 Jul; 37(7):770-778. PubMed ID: 38668688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The evolution of mate choice in a fluctuating environment.
    Charlesworth B
    J Theor Biol; 1988 Jan; 130(2):191-204. PubMed ID: 3419180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Postmating sexual selection favors males that sire offspring with low fitness.
    Bilde T; Foged A; Schilling N; Arnqvist G
    Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1705-6. PubMed ID: 19556506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Investigating the interaction between inter-locus and intra-locus sexual conflict using hemiclonal analysis in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Geeta Arun M; Chechi TS; Meena R; Bhosle SD; Srishti ; Prasad NG
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2022 Mar; 22(1):38. PubMed ID: 35346023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism.
    Albert AY; Otto SP
    Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5745):119-21. PubMed ID: 16210543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations Near Sexually Antagonistic Genes.
    Connallon T; Jordan CY
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Aug; 6(8):2273-84. PubMed ID: 27226163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females.
    Long TA; Pischedda A; Stewart AD; Rice WR
    PLoS Biol; 2009 Dec; 7(12):e1000254. PubMed ID: 19997646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.
    Kokko H; Heubel K
    Genetica; 2008 Feb; 132(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17619173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Liking the good guys: amplifying local adaptation via the evolution of condition-dependent mate choice.
    Veen T; Otto SP
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1804-15. PubMed ID: 26189918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Climatic factors and species range position predict sexually antagonistic selection across taxa.
    De Lisle SP; Goedert D; Reedy AM; Svensson EI
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 373(1757):. PubMed ID: 30150216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hybridization, sex-specific genomic architecture and local adaptation.
    Runemark A; Eroukhmanoff F; Nava-Bolaños A; Hermansen JS; Meier JI
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 373(1757):. PubMed ID: 30150218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.
    Lewis Z; Wedell N; Hunt J
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2085-97. PubMed ID: 21729062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.
    Kokko H; Heubel K
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 18327650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Association between sex ratio distortion and sexually antagonistic fitness consequences of female choice.
    Connallon T; Jakubowski E
    Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):2179-83. PubMed ID: 19453376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Partitioning of resources: the evolutionary genetics of sexual conflict over resource acquisition and allocation.
    Zajitschek F; Connallon T
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Apr; 30(4):826-838. PubMed ID: 28181338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intralocus Sexual Conflict and the Tragedy of the Commons in Seed Beetles.
    Berger D; Martinossi-Allibert I; Grieshop K; Lind MI; Maklakov AA; Arnqvist G
    Am Nat; 2016 Oct; 188(4):E98-E112. PubMed ID: 27622882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.