These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30150668)

  • 1. Experimental implementation of fully controlled dephasing dynamics and synthetic spectral densities.
    Liu ZD; Lyyra H; Sun YN; Liu BH; Li CF; Guo GC; Maniscalco S; Piilo J
    Nat Commun; 2018 Aug; 9(1):3453. PubMed ID: 30150668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Control quantum evolution speed of a single dephasing qubit for arbitrary initial states via periodic dynamical decoupling pulses.
    Song YJ; Tan QS; Kuang LM
    Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():43654. PubMed ID: 28272546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantum dephasing induced by non-Markovian random telegraph noise.
    Cai X
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):88. PubMed ID: 31919455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time-Dependent Dephasing and Quantum Transport.
    Moreira SV; Marques B; Semião FL
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Sep; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 34573804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coherent feedback control of a single qubit in diamond.
    Hirose M; Cappellaro P
    Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7597):77-80. PubMed ID: 27078567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dephasing Dynamics in a Non-Equilibrium Fluctuating Environment.
    Meng X; Sun Y; Wang Q; Ren J; Cai X; Czerwinski A
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Apr; 25(4):. PubMed ID: 37190422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linear optics simulation of quantum non-Markovian dynamics.
    Chiuri A; Greganti C; Mazzola L; Paternostro M; Mataloni P
    Sci Rep; 2012; 2():968. PubMed ID: 23236588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-markovian model of photon-assisted dephasing by electron-phonon interactions in a coupled quantum-dot-cavity system.
    Kaer P; Nielsen TR; Lodahl P; Jauho AP; Mørk J
    Phys Rev Lett; 2010 Apr; 104(15):157401. PubMed ID: 20482014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An open-system quantum simulator with trapped ions.
    Barreiro JT; Müller M; Schindler P; Nigg D; Monz T; Chwalla M; Hennrich M; Roos CF; Zoller P; Blatt R
    Nature; 2011 Feb; 470(7335):486-91. PubMed ID: 21350481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dephasing-Insensitive Quantum Information Storage and Processing with Superconducting Qubits.
    Guo Q; Zheng SB; Wang J; Song C; Zhang P; Li K; Liu W; Deng H; Huang K; Zheng D; Zhu X; Wang H; Lu CY; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2018 Sep; 121(13):130501. PubMed ID: 30312077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonlocal memory effects in the dynamics of open quantum systems.
    Laine EM; Breuer HP; Piilo J; Li CF; Guo GC
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 May; 108(21):210402. PubMed ID: 23003222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conservative chaotic map as a model of quantum many-body environment.
    Rossini D; Benenti G; Casati G
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 Sep; 74(3 Pt 2):036209. PubMed ID: 17025731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying the nonclassicality of pure dephasing.
    Chen HB; Lo PY; Gneiting C; Bae J; Chen YN; Nori F
    Nat Commun; 2019 Aug; 10(1):3794. PubMed ID: 31439832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental simulation of decoherence in photonics qudits.
    Marques B; Matoso AA; Pimenta WM; Gutiérrez-Esparza AJ; Santos MF; Pádua S
    Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16049. PubMed ID: 26527330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamics of a qubit while simultaneously monitoring its relaxation and dephasing.
    Ficheux Q; Jezouin S; Leghtas Z; Huard B
    Nat Commun; 2018 May; 9(1):1926. PubMed ID: 29765040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disentanglement Dynamics in Nonequilibrium Environments.
    Chen M; Chen H; Han T; Cai X
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Sep; 24(10):. PubMed ID: 37420350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimized dynamical decoupling in a model quantum memory.
    Biercuk MJ; Uys H; VanDevender AP; Shiga N; Itano WM; Bollinger JJ
    Nature; 2009 Apr; 458(7241):996-1000. PubMed ID: 19396139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suppressing qubit dephasing using real-time Hamiltonian estimation.
    Shulman MD; Harvey SP; Nichol JM; Bartlett SD; Doherty AC; Umansky V; Yacoby A
    Nat Commun; 2014 Oct; 5():5156. PubMed ID: 25295674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-Markovian suppression of charge qubit decoherence in the quantum point contact measurement.
    Lee MT; Zhang WM
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Dec; 129(22):224106. PubMed ID: 19071906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrafast optical control of individual quantum dot spin qubits.
    De Greve K; Press D; McMahon PL; Yamamoto Y
    Rep Prog Phys; 2013 Sep; 76(9):092501. PubMed ID: 24006335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.