BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30151709)

  • 1. Accuracy validation of incident photon fluence on detective quantum efficiency in mammography.
    Haba T; Koyama S; Otani N
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Dec; 41(4):847-852. PubMed ID: 30151709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy validation of incident photon fluence on DQE for various measurement conditions and X-ray units.
    Haba T; Kondo S; Hayashi D; Koyama S
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):423-30. PubMed ID: 23649923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid Monte Carlo simulation of detector DQE(f).
    Star-Lack J; Sun M; Meyer A; Morf D; Constantin D; Fahrig R; Abel E
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031916. PubMed ID: 24593734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An experimental framework for assessing the detective quantum efficiency of spectroscopic x-ray detectors.
    Zarif Yussefian N; Tanguay J
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1318-1335. PubMed ID: 36479933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
    Williams MB; Simoni PU; Smilowitz L; Stanton M; Phillips W; Stewart A
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Guntern D; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):906-14. PubMed ID: 17441236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comprehensive model for quantum noise characterization in digital mammography.
    Monnin P; Bosmans H; Verdun FR; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(5):2083-108. PubMed ID: 26895467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detective quantum efficiency dependence on x-ray energy weighting in mammography.
    Cahn RN; Cederström B; Danielsson M; Hall A; Lundqvist M; Nygren D
    Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2680-3. PubMed ID: 10619253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative investigation of the detective quantum efficiency of direct and indirect conversion detector technologies in dedicated breast CT.
    Kuttig JD; Steiding C; Kolditz D; Hupfer M; Karolczak M; Kalender WA
    Phys Med; 2015 Jun; 31(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 25841299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of a mammographic system based on single photon counting pixel arrays coupled to GaAs x-ray detectors.
    Amendolia SR; Bisogni MG; Delogu P; Fantacci ME; Paternoster G; Rosso V; Stefanini A
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1330-9. PubMed ID: 19472640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A detective quantum efficiency for spectroscopic X-ray imaging detectors.
    Tanguay J; Richtsmeier D; Dydula C; Day JA; Iniewski K; Bazalova-Carter M
    Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6781-6799. PubMed ID: 34460950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical Note: Impact on detective quantum efficiency of edge angle determination method by International Electrotechnical Commission methodology for cardiac x-ray image detectors.
    Gislason-Lee AJ; Tunstall CM; Kengyelics SK; Cowen AR; Davies AG
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4423-7. PubMed ID: 26233172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
    Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical characterization of a scanning photon counting digital mammography system based on Si-strip detectors.
    Aslund M; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Danielsson M
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):1918-25. PubMed ID: 17654894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-rate x-ray spectroscopy in mammography with a CdTe detector: a digital pulse processing approach.
    Abbene L; Gerardi G; Principato F; Del Sordo S; Ienzi R; Raso G
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6147-56. PubMed ID: 21302771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Investigation of measurement accuracy of factors used for detective quantum efficiency measurement in digital radiography].
    Kunitomo H; Koyama S; Higashide R; Ichikawa K; Hattori M; Okada Y; Hayashi N; Sawada M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Jul; 70(7):653-61. PubMed ID: 25055945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative analysis of OTF, NPS, and DQE in energy integrating and photon counting digital x-ray detectors.
    Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6480-95. PubMed ID: 21302803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.