BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30151709)

  • 21. The detective quantum efficiency of cadmium telluride photon-counting x-ray detectors in breast imaging applications.
    Day JA; Tanguay J
    Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1481-1494. PubMed ID: 34905627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
    El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Direct measurement of clinical mammographic x-ray spectra using a CdTe spectrometer.
    Santos JC; Tomal A; Furquim TA; Fausto AMF; Nogueira MS; Costa PR
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3504-3511. PubMed ID: 28429382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Imaging performance of the hybrid pixel detectors XPAD3-S.
    Brunner FC; Clemens JC; Hemmer C; Morel C
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1773-89. PubMed ID: 19258683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigation of the performance of digital mammographic X-ray equipment: determination of noise equivalent quanta (NEQQC) and detective quantum efficiency (DQEQC) compared with the automated analysis of CDMAM test images with CDCOM and CDIC programs.
    Loos C; Buhr H; Blendl C
    Rofo; 2013 Jul; 185(7):635-43. PubMed ID: 23801376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mammographic x-ray spectra measured by Compton spectroscopy using a high resolution Schottky CdTe detector.
    Maeda K; Matsumoto M
    Igaku Butsuri; 2004; 24(4):131-41. PubMed ID: 15795501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Results of an automatic evaluation of test images according to PAS 1054 and IEC 6220-1-2 on different types of digital mammographic units].
    Blendl C; Schreiber AC; Buhr H
    Rofo; 2009 Oct; 181(10):979-88. PubMed ID: 19676013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Noise power spectra of images from digital mammography detectors.
    Williams MB; Mangiafico PA; Simoni PU
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1279-93. PubMed ID: 10435530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative image quality measurements of a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2013 Dec; 185(12):1188-94. PubMed ID: 23888475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fundamental x-ray interaction limits in diagnostic imaging detectors: frequency-dependent Swank noise.
    Hajdok G; Battista JJ; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3194-204. PubMed ID: 18697544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
    Zhao W; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of the spatial-frequency-dependent DQE of optically coupled digital mammography detectors.
    Maidment AD; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1994 Jun; 21(6):721-9. PubMed ID: 7935207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems.
    Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 3974523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. System performance of a prototype flat-panel imager operated under mammographic conditions.
    Jee KW; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1874-90. PubMed ID: 12906206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An investigation of the imaging characteristics of the Y2O2S:Eu3+ phosphor for application in X-ray detectors of digital mammography.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Panayiotakis GS; Kanellopoulos E; Triantis D; Nomicos CD
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1998 Aug; 49(8):931-7. PubMed ID: 9650263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA
    Med Phys; 1997 Nov; 24(11):1661-70. PubMed ID: 9394272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography.
    Lazzari B; Belli G; Gori C; Rosselli Del Turco M
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2730-43. PubMed ID: 17821981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tutorial on X-ray photon counting detector characterization.
    Ren L; Zheng B; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 29154310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. New Software for DQE Calculation in Digital Mammography Compliant with IEC 62220-1-2.
    Dobrzyńska M; Wysocka-Rabin A; Fabiszewska E; Pasicz K; Skrzyński W
    J Digit Imaging; 2022 Oct; 35(5):1069-1078. PubMed ID: 36104636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.