These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30151709)

  • 41. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.
    Elbakri IA; Tesic MM; Xiong Q
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Characterization of photon-counting multislit breast tomosynthesis.
    Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 29159881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Imaging performance of phase-contrast breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation and a CdTe photon-counting detector.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Golosio B; Oliva P; Spandre G; Di Lillo F; Fedon C; Longo R; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 27160829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Spectral analysis of fundamental signal and noise performances in photoconductors for mammography.
    Kim HK; Lim CH; Tanguay J; Yun S; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2478-90. PubMed ID: 22559618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Frequency-dependent signal and noise in spectroscopic x-ray imaging.
    Tanguay J; Kim J; Kim HK; Iniewski K; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2881-2901. PubMed ID: 32239517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The detective quantum efficiency of photon-counting x-ray detectors using cascaded-systems analyses.
    Tanguay J; Yun S; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041913. PubMed ID: 23556907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effective detective quantum efficiency for two mammography systems: measurement and comparison against established metrics.
    Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101916. PubMed ID: 24089918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Direct measurement of mammographic X-ray spectra with a digital CdTe detection system.
    Abbene L; Gerardi G; Principato F; Del Sordo S; Raso G
    Sensors (Basel); 2012; 12(6):8390-404. PubMed ID: 22969406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Signal and noise transfer properties of photoelectric interactions in diagnostic x-ray imaging detectors.
    Hajdok G; Yao J; Battista JJ; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3601-20. PubMed ID: 17089826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5655-73. PubMed ID: 17047276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Performance evaluation of a "dual-side read" dedicated mammography computed radiography system.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1843-54. PubMed ID: 12906203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Should processed or raw image data be used in mammographic image quality analyses? A comparative study of three full-field digital mammography systems.
    Borg M; Badr I; Royle G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jan; 163(1):102-17. PubMed ID: 24692583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Physical and psychophysical characterization of a novel clinical system for digital mammography.
    Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Bertolini M; Borasi G; Golinelli P; Acchiappati D; Gallo E
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5139-48. PubMed ID: 19994524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Direct measurement of mammographic x-ray spectra using a CdZnTe detector.
    Matsumoto M; Yamamoto A; Honda I; Taniguchi A; Kanamori H
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1490-502. PubMed ID: 10947252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Technical Note: Comparison of first- and second-generation photon-counting slit-scanning tomosynthesis systems.
    Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):635-638. PubMed ID: 29265414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
    Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Physical characterization and performance comparison of active- and passive-pixel CMOS detectors for mammography.
    Elbakri IA; McIntosh BJ; Rickey DW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1743-55. PubMed ID: 19242050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impact of anti-charge sharing on the zero-frequency detective quantum efficiency of CdTe-based photon counting detector system: cascaded systems analysis and experimental validation.
    Ji X; Zhang R; Chen GH; Li K
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(9):095003. PubMed ID: 29582785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.