512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30151814)
1. Magnetic resonance elastography in nonlinear viscoelastic materials under load.
Capilnasiu A; Hadjicharalambous M; Fovargue D; Patel D; Holub O; Bilston L; Screen H; Sinkus R; Nordsletten D
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2019 Feb; 18(1):111-135. PubMed ID: 30151814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Soft tissue rheology and its implications for elastography: Challenges and opportunities.
Bilston LE
NMR Biomed; 2018 Oct; 31(10):e3832. PubMed ID: 28991387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of biomechanical properties of agar based tissue mimicking phantoms for ultrasound stiffness imaging techniques.
Manickam K; Machireddy RR; Seshadri S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():132-43. PubMed ID: 24769915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Viscoelastic Characterization of Soft Tissue-Mimicking Gelatin Phantoms using Indentation and Magnetic Resonance Elastography.
Feng Y; Qiu S; Chen Y; Wang R; He Z; Kong L; Chen Y; Ma S
J Vis Exp; 2022 May; (183):. PubMed ID: 35635467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining MR elastography and diffusion tensor imaging for the assessment of anisotropic mechanical properties: a phantom study.
Qin EC; Sinkus R; Geng G; Cheng S; Green M; Rae CD; Bilston LE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jan; 37(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 22987805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An automatic differentiation-based gradient method for inversion of the shear wave equation in magnetic resonance elastography: specific application in fibrous soft tissues.
Chatelin S; Charpentier I; Corbin N; Meylheuc L; Vappou J
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 61(13):5000-19. PubMed ID: 27300107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of viscosity estimation for oil-in-gelatin phantom in shear wave based ultrasound elastography.
Zhu Y; Dong C; Yin Y; Chen X; Guo Y; Zheng Y; Shen Y; Wang T; Zhang X; Chen S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 41(2):601-9. PubMed ID: 25542484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ex vivo bovine liver nonlinear viscoelastic properties: MR elastography and rheological measurements.
Jugé L; Foley P; Hatt A; Yeung J; Bilston LE
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Feb; 138():105638. PubMed ID: 36623403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Viscoelastic properties of liver measured by oscillatory rheometry and multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography.
Klatt D; Friedrich C; Korth Y; Vogt R; Braun J; Sack I
Biorheology; 2010; 47(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 20683156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance elastography compared with rotational rheometry for in vitro brain tissue viscoelasticity measurement.
Vappou J; Breton E; Choquet P; Goetz C; Willinger R; Constantinesco A
MAGMA; 2007 Dec; 20(5-6):273-8. PubMed ID: 18080819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification process based on shear wave propagation within a phantom using finite element modelling and magnetic resonance elastography.
Leclerc GE; Charleux F; Ho Ba Tho MC; Bensamoun SF
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 23947476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The performance of steady-state harmonic magnetic resonance elastography when applied to viscoelastic materials.
Doyley MM; Perreard I; Patterson AJ; Weaver JB; Paulsen KM
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):3970-9. PubMed ID: 20879559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of viscoelastic property characterization of plastisol phantoms with magnetic resonance elastography and high-frequency rheometry.
Lefebvre PM; Koon KT; Brusseau E; Nicolle S; Palieme JF; Lambert SA; Grenier D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1216-1219. PubMed ID: 28268544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterisation of the soft tissue viscous and elastic properties using ultrasound elastography and rheological models: validation and applications in plantar soft tissue assessment.
Tecse A; Romero SE; Naemi R; Castaneda B
Phys Med Biol; 2023 May; 68(10):. PubMed ID: 36996846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. On the relationship between viscoelasticity and water diffusion in soft biological tissues.
Braun J; Bernarding J; Snellings J; Meyer T; Dantas de Moraes PA; Safraou Y; Wells RG; Guo J; Tzschätzsch H; Zappe A; Pagel K; Sauer IM; Hillebrandt KH; Sack I
Acta Biomater; 2024 Jul; 182():42-53. PubMed ID: 38729549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Liquid-Liver Phantom: Mimicking the Viscoelastic Dispersion of Human Liver for Ultrasound- and MRI-Based Elastography.
Morr AS; Herthum H; Schrank F; Görner S; Anders MS; Lerchbaumer M; Müller HP; Fischer T; Jenderka KV; Hansen HHG; Janmey PA; Braun J; Sack I; Tzschätzsch H
Invest Radiol; 2022 Aug; 57(8):502-509. PubMed ID: 35195086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic Resonance Elastography Reconstruction for Anisotropic Tissues.
Babaei B; Fovargue D; Lloyd RA; Miller R; Jugé L; Kaplan M; Sinkus R; Nordsletten DA; Bilston LE
Med Image Anal; 2021 Dec; 74():102212. PubMed ID: 34587584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using static preload with magnetic resonance elastography to estimate large strain viscoelastic properties of bovine liver.
Clarke EC; Cheng S; Green M; Sinkus R; Bilston LE
J Biomech; 2011 Sep; 44(13):2461-5. PubMed ID: 21762921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of a hyper-viscoelastic phantom mimicking biological soft tissue using an abdominal pneumatic driver with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).
Leclerc GE; Debernard L; Foucart F; Robert L; Pelletier KM; Charleux F; Ehman R; Ho Ba Tho MC; Bensamoun SF
J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(6):952-7. PubMed ID: 22284992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of quantitative shear wave MR-elastography with mechanical compression tests.
Hamhaber U; Grieshaber FA; Nagel JH; Klose U
Magn Reson Med; 2003 Jan; 49(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 12509821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
