These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30152838)

  • 41. The effect of adhesion on the contact radius in atomic force microscopy indentation.
    Sirghi L; Rossi F
    Nanotechnology; 2009 Sep; 20(36):365702. PubMed ID: 19687552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Determination of texture properties of banana fruit cells with an atomic force microscope: A case study on elastic modulus and stiffness.
    Khodabakhshian R; Naeemi A; Bayati MR
    J Texture Stud; 2021 Jun; 52(3):389-399. PubMed ID: 33675545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Non-Hertzian approach to analyzing mechanical properties of endothelial cells probed by atomic force microscopy.
    Costa KD; Sim AJ; Yin FC
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Apr; 128(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 16524328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Nanoindentation testing and finite element simulations of cortical bone allowing for anisotropic elastic and inelastic mechanical response.
    Carnelli D; Lucchini R; Ponzoni M; Contro R; Vena P
    J Biomech; 2011 Jul; 44(10):1852-8. PubMed ID: 21570077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dynamic elastic modulus of porcine articular cartilage determined at two different levels of tissue organization by indentation-type atomic force microscopy.
    Stolz M; Raiteri R; Daniels AU; VanLandingham MR; Baschong W; Aebi U
    Biophys J; 2004 May; 86(5):3269-83. PubMed ID: 15111440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Quantifying CD95/cl-CD95L Implications in Cell Mechanics and Membrane Tension by Atomic Force Microscopy Based Force Measurements.
    Sadoun A; Puech PH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1557():139-151. PubMed ID: 28078590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Elastic modulus of viral nanotubes.
    Zhao Y; Ge Z; Fang J
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):031914. PubMed ID: 18851072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Micropipette aspiration method for characterizing biological materials with surface energy.
    Ding Y; Wang GF; Feng XQ; Yu SW
    J Biomech; 2018 Oct; 80():32-36. PubMed ID: 30170840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Elastic moduli of lipid membranes: Reproducibility of AFM measures.
    Eid J; Greige-Gerges H; Monticelli L; Jraij A
    Chem Phys Lipids; 2021 Jan; 234():105011. PubMed ID: 33217391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy.
    Mathur AB; Collinsworth AM; Reichert WM; Kraus WE; Truskey GA
    J Biomech; 2001 Dec; 34(12):1545-53. PubMed ID: 11716856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Nonlinear compliance of elastic layers to indentation.
    Fessel A; Döbereiner HG
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Apr; 17(2):419-438. PubMed ID: 29094275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mechanical properties study of SW480 cells based on AFM.
    Liu X; Song Z; Qu Y; Wang G; Wang Z
    Cell Biol Int; 2015 Aug; 39(8):972-7. PubMed ID: 25881744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of single-phase isotropic elastic and fibril-reinforced poroelastic models for indentation of rabbit articular cartilage.
    Julkunen P; Harjula T; Marjanen J; Helminen HJ; Jurvelin JS
    J Biomech; 2009 Mar; 42(5):652-6. PubMed ID: 19193381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mechanical properties of human tympanic membrane in the quasi-static regime from in situ point indentation measurements.
    Aernouts J; Aerts JR; Dirckx JJ
    Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):45-54. PubMed ID: 22583920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Determination of work of adhesion of biological cell under AFM bead indentation.
    Zhu X; Siamantouras E; Liu KK; Liu X
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Mar; 56():77-86. PubMed ID: 26688423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of gel thickness on microscopic indentation measurements of gel modulus.
    Long R; Hall MS; Wu M; Hui CY
    Biophys J; 2011 Aug; 101(3):643-50. PubMed ID: 21806932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of cell mechanical measurements provided by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Micropipette Aspiration (MPA).
    Daza R; González-Bermúdez B; Cruces J; De la Fuente M; Plaza GR; Arroyo-Hernández M; Elices M; Pérez-Rigueiro J; Guinea GV
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Jul; 95():103-115. PubMed ID: 30986755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Measuring viscoelasticity of soft samples using atomic force microscopy.
    Tripathy S; Berger EJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Sep; 131(9):094507. PubMed ID: 19725704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Elastic moduli of living epithelial pancreatic cancer cells and their skeletonized keratin intermediate filament network.
    Walter N; Busch T; Seufferlein T; Spatz JP
    Biointerphases; 2011 Jun; 6(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 21721843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Measuring the elastic properties of living cells with atomic force microscopy indentation.
    Mackay JL; Kumar S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 931():313-29. PubMed ID: 23027009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.