These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30152957)

  • 1. Comparative Evaluation of Surface Defects In Single File Rotary Systems Before and After Instrumentation In Curved Root Canals.
    Purayil TP; Ballal NV; Ginjupalli K
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Aug; 26(3):130-135. PubMed ID: 30152957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scanning electron microscopy of superficial defects in Twisted files and Reciproc nickel-titanium files after use in extracted molars.
    Caballero H; Rivera F; Salas H
    Int Endod J; 2015 Mar; 48(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 24766442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
    D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Self-Adjusting File system (SAF) for the instrumentation of primary molar root canals: a micro-computed tomographic study.
    Kaya E; Elbay M; Yiğit D
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Jun; 18(2):105-110. PubMed ID: 28598180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of Rotary Endodontic Instruments on Smear Layer Removal in Root Canals of Primary Teeth: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Subramaniam P; Girish Babu KL; Tabrez TA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 26950816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy comparisons of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments used with reciprocating motion.
    Kim HC; Hwang YJ; Jung DW; You SY; Kim HC; Lee W
    Scanning; 2013; 35(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 22833465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.
    Wu J; Lei G; Yan M; Yu Y; Yu J; Zhang G
    J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 21787484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
    Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of two different nickel-titanium rotary files in curved root canals of extracted human molar teeth.
    Ferrara G; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Ceci C; Del Fabbro M; Machtou P
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26343421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Alterations in the Surface Topographies of HyFlex CM and HyFlex EDM Nickel-titanium Files after Root Canal Preparation: A Three-dimensional Optical Profilometry Study.
    Uslu G; Özyürek T; Yılmaz K
    J Endod; 2018 Jan; 44(1):115-119. PubMed ID: 29032817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
    Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The deterioration of rotary nickel-titanium files under controlled conditions.
    Svec TA; Powers JM
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 11833680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars.
    Paqué F; Al-Jadaa A; Kfir A
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 22188277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single file reciprocating technique using conventional nickel-titanium rotary endodontic files.
    Jin SY; Lee W; Kang MK; Hur B; Kim HC
    Scanning; 2013; 35(6):349-54. PubMed ID: 23364950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.