224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30154229)
1. Intensive Surveillance with Biannual Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Downstages Breast Cancer in
Guindalini RSC; Zheng Y; Abe H; Whitaker K; Yoshimatsu TF; Walsh T; Schacht D; Kulkarni K; Sheth D; Verp MS; Bradbury AR; Churpek J; Obeid E; Mueller J; Khramtsova G; Liu F; Raoul A; Cao H; Romero IL; Hong S; Livingston R; Jaskowiak N; Wang X; Debiasi M; Pritchard CC; King MC; Karczmar G; Newstead GM; Huo D; Olopade OI
Clin Cancer Res; 2019 Mar; 25(6):1786-1794. PubMed ID: 30154229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surveillance of Women with the BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation by Using Biannual Automated Breast US, MR Imaging, and Mammography.
van Zelst JCM; Mus RDM; Woldringh G; Rutten MJCM; Bult P; Vreemann S; de Jong M; Karssemeijer N; Hoogerbrugge N; Mann RM
Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):376-388. PubMed ID: 28609204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Five screening-detected breast cancer cases in initially disease-free BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Shimada S; Yoshida R; Nakashima E; Kitagawa D; Gomi N; Horii R; Takeuchi S; Ashihara Y; Kita M; Akiyama F; Ohno S; Saito M; Arai M
Breast Cancer; 2019 Nov; 26(6):846-851. PubMed ID: 30980249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer detection and tumor characteristics in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Krammer J; Pinker-Domenig K; Robson ME; Gönen M; Bernard-Davila B; Morris EA; Mangino DA; Jochelson MS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jun; 163(3):565-571. PubMed ID: 28343309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relevance and efficacy of breast cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers above 60 years: a national cohort study.
Saadatmand S; Vos JR; Hooning MJ; Oosterwijk JC; Koppert LB; de Bock GH; Ausems MG; van Asperen CJ; Aalfs CM; Gómez Garcia EB; Meijers-Heijboer H; Hoogerbrugge N; Piek M; Seynaeve C; Verhoef C; Rookus M; Tilanus-Linthorst MM;
Int J Cancer; 2014 Dec; 135(12):2940-9. PubMed ID: 24789418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.
Warner E; Plewes DB; Hill KA; Causer PA; Zubovits JT; Jong RA; Cutrara MR; DeBoer G; Yaffe MJ; Messner SJ; Meschino WS; Piron CA; Narod SA
JAMA; 2004 Sep; 292(11):1317-25. PubMed ID: 15367553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI breast screening in high-risk women: cancer detection and survival analysis.
Evans DG; Kesavan N; Lim Y; Gadde S; Hurley E; Massat NJ; Maxwell AJ; Ingham S; Eeles R; Leach MO; ; Howell A; Duffy SW
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jun; 145(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 24687378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density.
Riedl CC; Luft N; Bernhart C; Weber M; Bernathova M; Tea MK; Rudas M; Singer CF; Helbich TH
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1128-35. PubMed ID: 25713430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective study of breast MRI in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: effect of mutation status on cancer incidence.
Shah P; Rosen M; Stopfer J; Siegfried J; Kaltman R; Mason B; Armstrong K; Nathanson KL; Schnall M; Domchek SM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Dec; 118(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 19609668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in natural history between breast cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and effects of MRI screening-MRISC, MARIBS, and Canadian studies combined.
Heijnsdijk EA; Warner E; Gilbert FJ; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Evans G; Causer PA; Eeles RA; Kaas R; Draisma G; Ramsay EA; Warren RM; Hill KA; Hoogerbrugge N; Wasser MN; Bergers E; Oosterwijk JC; Hooning MJ; Rutgers EJ; Klijn JG; Plewes DB; Leach MO; de Koning HJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Sep; 21(9):1458-68. PubMed ID: 22744338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should women with a BRCA1/2 mutation aged 60 and older be offered intensified breast cancer screening? - A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Obdeijn IM; Oosterwijk JC; Feenstra TL; Houssami N; de Bock GH
Breast; 2019 Jun; 45():82-88. PubMed ID: 30904701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The supplemental value of mammographic screening over breast MRI alone in BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Obdeijn IM; Mann RM; Loo CCE; Lobbes M; Voormolen EMC; van Deurzen CHM; de Bock G; ; Hooning MJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(3):581-588. PubMed ID: 32333294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI.
Vreemann S; van Zelst JCM; Schlooz-Vries M; Bult P; Hoogerbrugge N; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A; Mann RM
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Aug; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 30075794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer.
Griebsch I; Brown J; Boggis C; Dixon A; Dixon M; Easton D; Eeles R; Evans DG; Gilbert FJ; Hawnaur J; Kessar P; Lakhani SR; Moss SM; Nerurkar A; Padhani AR; Pointon LJ; Potterton J; Thompson D; Turnbull LW; Walker LG; Warren R; Leach MO;
Br J Cancer; 2006 Oct; 95(7):801-10. PubMed ID: 17016484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast magnetic resonance image screening and ductal lavage in women at high genetic risk for breast carcinoma.
Hartman AR; Daniel BL; Kurian AW; Mills MA; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Kingham KE; Chun NM; Herfkens RJ; Ford JM; Plevritis SK
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(3):479-89. PubMed ID: 14745863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective study of breast cancer incidence in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation under surveillance with and without magnetic resonance imaging.
Warner E; Hill K; Causer P; Plewes D; Jong R; Yaffe M; Foulkes WD; Ghadirian P; Lynch H; Couch F; Wong J; Wright F; Sun P; Narod SA
J Clin Oncol; 2011 May; 29(13):1664-9. PubMed ID: 21444874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for risk-stratified screening in women with BRCA mutations or high familial risk for breast cancer: are we there yet?
Whitaker KD; Sheth D; Olopade OI
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):243-250. PubMed ID: 32621252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women with familial risk (FaMRIsc): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Saadatmand S; Geuzinge HA; Rutgers EJT; Mann RM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Zonderland HM; Tollenaar RAEM; Lobbes MBI; Ausems MGEM; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Mares-Engelberts I; Luiten EJT; Heijnsdijk EAM; Verhoef C; Karssemeijer N; Oosterwijk JC; Obdeijn IM; de Koning HJ; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA;
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Aug; 20(8):1136-1147. PubMed ID: 31221620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Annual screening strategies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers: a comparative effectiveness analysis.
Lowry KP; Lee JM; Kong CY; McMahon PM; Gilmore ME; Cott Chubiz JE; Pisano ED; Gatsonis C; Ryan PD; Ozanne EM; Gazelle GS
Cancer; 2012 Apr; 118(8):2021-30. PubMed ID: 21935911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
