These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30154514)
1. Scenario analysis of ecosystem service changes and interactions in a mountain-oasis-desert system: a case study in Altay Prefecture, China. Fu Q; Hou Y; Wang B; Bi X; Li B; Zhang X Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12939. PubMed ID: 30154514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of land use and climate change on ecosystem services in Central Asia's arid regions: A case study in Altay Prefecture, China. Fu Q; Li B; Hou Y; Bi X; Zhang X Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 607-608():633-646. PubMed ID: 28709097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying ecosystem service bundles and the spatiotemporal characteristics of trade-offs and synergies in coal mining areas with a high groundwater table. Li S; Zhao Y; Xiao W; Yellishetty M; Yang D Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 807(Pt 3):151036. PubMed ID: 34673072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining ecosystem service relationships and DPSIR framework to manage multiple ecosystem services. Xue H; Li S; Chang J Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Mar; 187(3):117. PubMed ID: 25690608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A conservation decision-making framework based on ecosystem service hotspot and interaction analyses on multiple scales. Hou Y; Li B; Müller F; Fu Q; Chen W Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 643():277-291. PubMed ID: 29940440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ecosystem services in conservation planning: Assessing compatible vs. incompatible conservation. Fang C; Cai Z; Devlin AT; Yan X; Chen H; Zeng X; Xia Y; Zhang Q J Environ Manage; 2022 Jun; 312():114906. PubMed ID: 35390611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling the influence of alternative forest management scenarios on wood production and carbon storage: A case study in the Mediterranean region. Bottalico F; Pesola L; Vizzarri M; Antonello L; Barbati A; Chirici G; Corona P; Cullotta S; Garfì V; Giannico V; Lafortezza R; Lombardi F; Marchetti M; Nocentini S; Riccioli F; Travaglini D; Sallustio L Environ Res; 2016 Jan; 144(Pt B):72-87. PubMed ID: 26522278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Land Cover Implications on Ecosystem Service Delivery: a Multi-Scenario Study of Trade-offs and Synergies in River Basins. Padilha J; Carvalho-Santos C; Cássio F; Pascoal C Environ Manage; 2024 Apr; 73(4):753-768. PubMed ID: 38063877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ecosystem services changes between 2000 and 2015 in the Loess Plateau, China: A response to ecological restoration. Wu D; Zou C; Cao W; Xiao T; Gong G PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209483. PubMed ID: 30689646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling soil conservation, water conservation and their tradeoffs: a case study in Beijing. Bai Y; Ouyang Z; Zheng H; Li X; Zhuang C; Jiang B J Environ Sci (China); 2012; 24(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 22655354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem service values: Effects of land-use changes from past to future (1860-2100). Schirpke U; Tscholl S; Tasser E J Environ Manage; 2020 Oct; 272():111068. PubMed ID: 32854880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analyzing Land-Use Change Scenarios for Ecosystem Services and their Trade-Offs in the Ecological Conservation Area in Beijing, China. Li Z; Cheng X; Han H Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(22):. PubMed ID: 33233725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in land-uses and ecosystem services under multi-scenarios simulation. Liu J; Li J; Qin K; Zhou Z; Yang X; Li T Sci Total Environ; 2017 May; 586():522-526. PubMed ID: 28202244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrating the SD-CLUE-S and InVEST models into assessment of oasis carbon storage in northwestern China. Liang Y; Liu L; Huang J PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172494. PubMed ID: 28231328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying ecosystem service mismatches for land use planning: spatial-temporal characteristics and novel approach-a case study in Jiangsu Province, China. Zhou Y; Li J; Pu L Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(18):26483-26497. PubMed ID: 34855171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Scenario simulation of ecosystem service trade-offs in bay cities: A case study in Quanzhou, Fujian Province, China]. DU Y; Shui W; Sun XR; Yang HF; Zheng JY Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2019 Dec; 30(12):4293-4302. PubMed ID: 31840476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying key areas of ecosystem services potential to improve ecological management in Chongqing City, southwest China. Xiao Y; Xiao Q Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Mar; 190(4):258. PubMed ID: 29600440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simulating and mapping the spatial and seasonal effects of future climate and land -use changes on ecosystem services in the Yanhe watershed, China. Chen D; Li J; Zhou Z; Liu Y; Li T; Liu J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jan; 25(2):1115-1131. PubMed ID: 29079980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preference, perceived change, and professed relationship among ecosystem services in the Himalayas. Aryal K; Maraseni T; Apan A J Environ Manage; 2023 Oct; 344():118522. PubMed ID: 37390580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulation and optimization of land use pattern to embed ecological suitability in an oasis region: A case study of Ganzhou district, Gansu province, China. Li Q; Wang L; Gul HN; Li D J Environ Manage; 2021 Jun; 287():112321. PubMed ID: 33711660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]