BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30155912)

  • 1. Likelihood-based inference for bounds of causal parameters.
    Lee W; Sjölander A; Larsson A; Pawitan Y
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(30):4695-4706. PubMed ID: 30155912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causal inference methods to assess safety upper bounds in randomized trials with noncompliance.
    Wang Y; Berlin JA; Pinheiro J; Wilcox MA
    Clin Trials; 2015 Jun; 12(3):265-75. PubMed ID: 25733675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sharp nonparametric bounds and randomization inference for treatment effects on an ordinal outcome.
    Chiba Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(25):3966-3975. PubMed ID: 28703430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
    Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data.
    Chen H; Geng Z; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):675-82. PubMed ID: 18759847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Likelihood inference on the relative risk in split-cluster designs.
    Shoukri MM; Colak D; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 21335588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency and robustness of causal effect estimators when noncompliance is measured with error.
    Boatman JA; Vock DM; Koopmeiners JS
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4126-4141. PubMed ID: 30109713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-step estimation in ratio-of-mediator-probability weighted causal mediation analysis.
    Bein E; Deutsch J; Hong G; Porter KE; Qin X; Yang C
    Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(8):1304-1324. PubMed ID: 29322536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome.
    Gruber S; van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 26. PubMed ID: 21731529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation and inference for the causal effect of receiving treatment on a multinomial outcome.
    Cheng J
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 18373714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation and inference for the causal effect of receiving treatment on a multinomial outcome: an alternative approach.
    Baker SG
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):319-23; discussion 323-5. PubMed ID: 20560933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discussion of "Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data".
    Small DS; Cheng J
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):682-6; discussion 689-91. PubMed ID: 18759846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating causal effects of treatment in RCTs with provider and subject noncompliance.
    Sheng E; Li W; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(5):738-750. PubMed ID: 30347462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of methods for estimating the causal effect of a treatment in randomized clinical trials subject to noncompliance.
    Little RJ; Long Q; Lin X
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):640-9. PubMed ID: 18510650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the sensitivity of methods for estimating principal causal effects.
    Stuart EA; Jo B
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):657-74. PubMed ID: 21971481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exact confidence intervals for the average causal effect on a binary outcome.
    Li X; Ding P
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 26833798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bounds on the average causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance by covariate adjustment.
    Shan N; Xu PF
    Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 27062639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What can go wrong when ignoring correlation bounds in the use of generalized estimating equations.
    Sabo RT; Chaganty NR
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2501-7. PubMed ID: 20690109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Causal inference in paired two-arm experimental studies under noncompliance with application to prognosis of myocardial infarction.
    Bartolucci F; Farcomeni A
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(25):4348-66. PubMed ID: 23754710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Causal models for randomized trials with two active treatments and continuous compliance.
    Ma Y; Roy J; Marcus B
    Stat Med; 2011 Aug; 30(19):2349-62. PubMed ID: 21751229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.