300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30155970)
1. Psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia: acceptability, reliability, and validity.
Pritchard M; Hilari K; Cocks N; Dipper L
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2018 Nov; 53(6):1078-1093. PubMed ID: 30155970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia.
Pritchard M; Hilari K; Cocks N; Dipper L
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2017 Nov; 52(6):689-732. PubMed ID: 28560767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The development of a novel, standardized, norm-referenced Arabic Discourse Assessment Tool (ADAT), including an examination of psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia.
Alyahya RSW
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38887796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Italian adaptation of the functional outcome questionnaire - aphasia: initial psychometric evaluation.
Spaccavento S; Cafforio E; Cellamare F; Colucci A; Di Palma A; Falcone R; Craca A; Loverre A; Nardulli R; Glueckauf RL
Disabil Rehabil; 2018 Dec; 40(24):2925-2930. PubMed ID: 28776480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring verbal and non-verbal communication in aphasia: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Scenario Test.
van der Meulen I; van de Sandt-Koenderman WM; Duivenvoorden HJ; Ribbers GM
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2010; 45(4):424-35. PubMed ID: 20144004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Moroccan Arabic Bedside Western Aphasia Battery-Revised: Linguistic and Psychometric Properties.
El Ouardi L; Yeou M; Rami Y; Belahsen MF
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Jul; 66(7):2376-2389. PubMed ID: 37227788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity characteristics of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB).
Shewan CM; Kertesz A
J Speech Hear Disord; 1980 Aug; 45(3):308-24. PubMed ID: 7412225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of The Scenario Test UK for people with aphasia.
Hilari K; Galante L; Huck A; Pritchard M; Allen L; Dipper L
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2018 Jul; 53(4):748-760. PubMed ID: 29500847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Main Concept Analysis: Validation and sensitivity in differentiating discourse produced by unimpaired English speakers from individuals with aphasia and dementia of Alzheimer type.
Kong AP; Whiteside J; Bargmann P
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2016 Oct; 41(3):129-41. PubMed ID: 26059177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A scoping review of transcription-less practices for analysis of aphasic discourse and implications for future research.
Stark BC; Dalton SG
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38520735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptation of The Scenario Test for Greek-speaking people with aphasia: A reliability and validity study.
Charalambous M; Phylactou P; Elriz T; Psychogios L; Annoni JM; Kambanaros M
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2022 Jul; 57(4):865-880. PubMed ID: 35555844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating informative content and global coherence in fluent and non-fluent aphasia.
Hazamy AA; Obermeyer J
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2020 Jan; 55(1):110-120. PubMed ID: 31600017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The German Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS-G): reliability and validity evidence.
Neumann S; Rietz C; Stenneken P
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2017 Sep; 52(5):585-594. PubMed ID: 28032414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An Integrative Analysis of Spontaneous Storytelling Discourse in Aphasia: Relationship With Listeners' Rating and Prediction of Severity and Fluency Status of Aphasia.
Kong AP; Wong CW
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov; 27(4):1491-1505. PubMed ID: 30458505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Serbian Aphasia Screening Test.
Vuković M; Milovanović T; Teovanović P; Stojanovik V
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0304565. PubMed ID: 38820406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39): evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity.
Hilari K; Byng S; Lamping DL; Smith SC
Stroke; 2003 Aug; 34(8):1944-50. PubMed ID: 12855827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attentive Reading With Constrained Summarization Adapted to Address Written Discourse in People With Mild Aphasia.
Obermeyer JA; Edmonds LA
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Mar; 27(1S):392-405. PubMed ID: 29497751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Russian Aphasia Test: The first comprehensive, quantitative, standardized, and computerized aphasia language battery in Russian.
Ivanova MV; Akinina YS; Soloukhina OA; Iskra EV; Buivolova OV; Chrabaszcz AV; Stupina EA; Khudyakova MV; Akhutina TV; Dragoy O
PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0258946. PubMed ID: 34793469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A study on the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Scenario Test for people with chronic stroke-induced aphasia: A cross-sectional study.
Kodani Y; Sekine K; Tanaka Y; Nagami S; Nakamura K; Fukunaga S; Nakamura H
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38691670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Reliability of Telepractice Administration of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised in Persons With Primary Progressive Aphasia.
Rao LA; Roberts AC; Schafer R; Rademaker A; Blaze E; Esparza M; Salley E; Coventry C; Weintraub S; Mesulam MM; Rogalski E
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2022 Mar; 31(2):881-895. PubMed ID: 35175852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
