BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30156892)

  • 1. Comparative Evaluation of Radiographic Parameters of Foot Pronation in Two Different Conditions versus Barefoot.
    Anselmo DS; Skolnik J; Keeter E; El-Sayed AM; Love E
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2018 Jul; 108(4):285-291. PubMed ID: 30156892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Association Between Rearfoot Motion While Barefoot and Shod in Different Types of Running Shoes in Recreational Runners.
    Silva ÉQ; Miana AN; Ferreira JSSP; Kiyomoto HD; Dinato MCME; Sacco ICN
    J Sports Sci Med; 2020 Jun; 19(2):383-389. PubMed ID: 32390732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic in-vivo assessment of navicular drop while running in barefoot, minimalist, and motion control footwear conditions.
    Hoffman SE; Peltz CD; Haladik JA; Divine G; Nurse MA; Bey MJ
    Gait Posture; 2015 Mar; 41(3):825-9. PubMed ID: 25791869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of shoes on the torsion and rearfoot motion in running.
    Stacoff A; Kälin X; Stüssi E
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1991 Apr; 23(4):482-90. PubMed ID: 1676133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The assessment of three-dimensional foot pronation using a principal component analysis method in the stance phase of running.
    Rabiei M; Eslami M; Movaghar AF
    Foot (Edinb); 2016 Dec; 29():11-17. PubMed ID: 27888786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of anti-pronation shoes on lower limb kinematics and kinetics in female runners with pronated feet: The role of physical fatigue.
    Jafarnezhadgero A; Alavi-Mehr SM; Granacher U
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216818. PubMed ID: 31086402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in neutral foot positions when measured barefoot compared to in shoes with varying stiffnesses.
    Shultz R; Birmingham TB; Jenkyn TR
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Dec; 33(10):1309-13. PubMed ID: 21700484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lower extremity biomechanical relationships with different speeds in traditional, minimalist, and barefoot footwear.
    Fredericks W; Swank S; Teisberg M; Hampton B; Ridpath L; Hanna JB
    J Sports Sci Med; 2015 Jun; 14(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 25983575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acute effect of different minimalist shoes on foot strike pattern and kinematics in rearfoot strikers during running.
    Squadrone R; Rodano R; Hamill J; Preatoni E
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(11):1196-204. PubMed ID: 25529114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of different footwear on force of landing during running.
    Cheung RT; Ng GY
    Phys Ther; 2008 May; 88(5):620-8. PubMed ID: 18276937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kinematic and kinetic comparison of running in standard and minimalist shoes.
    Willy RW; Davis IS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Feb; 46(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 23877378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of minimalist footwear strategies for simulating barefoot running: a randomized crossover study.
    Hollander K; Argubi-Wollesen A; Reer R; Zech A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125880. PubMed ID: 26011042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of three different levels of footwear stability on pain outcomes in women runners: a randomised control trial.
    Ryan MB; Valiant GA; McDonald K; Taunton JE
    Br J Sports Med; 2011 Jul; 45(9):715-21. PubMed ID: 20584759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motion-control shoes help maintaining low loading rate levels during fatiguing running in pronated female runners.
    Jafarnezhadgero AA; Sorkhe E; Oliveira AS
    Gait Posture; 2019 Sep; 73():65-70. PubMed ID: 31299505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calcaneus range of motion underestimated by markers on running shoe heel.
    Alcantara RS; Trudeau MB; Rohr ES
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():68-72. PubMed ID: 29723650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Foot motion in children shoes: a comparison of barefoot walking with shod walking in conventional and flexible shoes.
    Wolf S; Simon J; Patikas D; Schuster W; Armbrust P; Döderlein L
    Gait Posture; 2008 Jan; 27(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 17353125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does "transition shoe" promote an intermediate biomechanical condition compared to running in conventional shoe and in reduced protection condition?
    da Silva Azevedo AP; Mezêncio B; Valvassori R; Mochizuki L; Amadio AC; Serrão JC
    Gait Posture; 2016 May; 46():142-6. PubMed ID: 27131192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Foot pronation is not associated with increased injury risk in novice runners wearing a neutral shoe: a 1-year prospective cohort study.
    Nielsen RO; Buist I; Parner ET; Nohr EA; Sørensen H; Lind M; Rasmussen S
    Br J Sports Med; 2014 Mar; 48(6):440-7. PubMed ID: 23766439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In-shoe loading in rearfoot and non-rearfoot strikers during running using minimalist footwear.
    Kernozek TW; Meardon S; Vannatta CN
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 Dec; 35(13):1112-7. PubMed ID: 24977946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.