BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30157082)

  • 1. Hearing Protector Attenuation and Noise Exposure Among Metal Manufacturing Workers.
    Sayler SK; Rabinowitz PM; Galusha D; Sun K; Neitzel RL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):680-689. PubMed ID: 30157082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers' exposure to noise.
    Morata TC; Gong W; Tikka C; Samelli AG; Verbeek JH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 May; 5(5):CD015066. PubMed ID: 38757544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Study on the fit testing for the workers wearing hearing protection device in machinery manufacturing enterprises].
    Wang YN; Su SB; Liao CH; Zhong X
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2024 Jan; 42(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 38311944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.
    Neitzel R; Seixas N
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15788384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring earplug noise attenuation: A comparison of laboratory and field methods.
    Karch SJ; Federman J; Ginsberg JT; Qureshi I
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2024 Jan; 21(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving Hearing Protection Device Noise Attenuation Through Fit-Testing in an Occupational Health Clinic.
    Hayes ME; Hammond S; Montgomery AP; Stephenson L
    Workplace Health Saf; 2022 Apr; 70(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 35353017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States.
    Daniell WE; Swan SS; McDaniel MM; Camp JE; Cohen MA; Stebbins JG
    Occup Environ Med; 2006 May; 63(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16551755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of hearing protection use in construction workers.
    Edelson J; Neitzel R; Meischke H; Daniell W; Sheppard L; Stover B; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Aug; 53(6):605-15. PubMed ID: 19531807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Research on the protective effect of hearing protective device for workers exposed to noise in a motor manufacturing enterprise].
    Zhong X; Fu SJ; Zhu JW; Li X; Shi B; Su SB
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 41(11):814-818. PubMed ID: 38073207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing protector fit testing with off-shore oil-rig inspectors in Louisiana and Texas.
    Murphy WJ; Themann CL; Murata TK
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):688-98. PubMed ID: 27414471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The role of information and training for workers on the correct use of earplugs in assessing real noise attenuation with E-A-RfitTM system].
    Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Germano C; Dentamaro A; Di Lorenzo L
    Med Lav; 2015 Jul; 106(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 26154471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of the adjustment of retrospective noise exposure for use of hearing protection devices.
    Sbihi H; Teschke K; MacNab YC; Davies HW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 20237208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Analysis of verification results of protective effects of hearing protectors in different industries].
    Shi HX; Su SB; Liu M; Li RZ; Wang TJ; Xiao B
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2023 May; 41(5):333-337. PubMed ID: 37248077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fit-testing hearing protectors: an idea whose time has come.
    Hager LD
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):147-51. PubMed ID: 21368440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occupational exposures to noise resulting from the workplace use of personal media players at a manufacturing facility.
    Autenrieth DA; Sandfort DR; Lipsey T; Brazile WJ
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(10):592-601. PubMed ID: 22937995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Verifying earplug attenuation and evaluating the effectiveness of one-on-one training along with earplug fit testing at nine facilities in China.
    Gong W; Zhang J; Liu X; Ding E; Zhu B
    Am J Ind Med; 2021 Sep; 64(9):771-780. PubMed ID: 34250617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.