These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30157179)

  • 1. 1H MR spectroscopy of the motor cortex immediately following transcranial direct current stimulation at 7 Tesla.
    Ryan K; Wawrzyn K; Gati JS; Chronik BA; Wong D; Duggal N; Bartha R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0198053. PubMed ID: 30157179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of bi-hemispheric M1-M1 transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex neurophysiology and metabolite concentration.
    Tremblay S; Lafleur LP; Proulx S; Beaulé V; Latulipe-Loiselle A; Doyon J; Marjańska M; Théoret H
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2016 May; 34(4):587-602. PubMed ID: 27232951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function in patients with stroke.
    Kwon TG; Park E; Kang C; Chang WH; Kim YH
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 34(6):915-923. PubMed ID: 27689549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in spectroscopic biomarkers after transcranial direct current stimulation in children with perinatal stroke.
    Carlson HL; Ciechanski P; Harris AD; MacMaster FP; Kirton A
    Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 28958737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
    Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.
    Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-related differences of motor cortex plasticity in adults: A transcranial direct current stimulation study.
    Ghasemian-Shirvan E; Farnad L; Mosayebi-Samani M; Verstraelen S; Meesen RLJ; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA
    Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(6):1588-1599. PubMed ID: 32949779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal, motor and somatosensory cortices on cortical excitability and pain perception - a double-blind randomised sham-controlled study.
    Vaseghi B; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 42(7):2426-37. PubMed ID: 26275236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can electric fields explain inter-individual variability in transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex?
    Laakso I; Mikkonen M; Koyama S; Hirata A; Tanaka S
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):626. PubMed ID: 30679770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural correlates of unihemispheric and bihemispheric motor cortex stimulation in healthy young adults.
    Lindenberg R; Sieg MM; Meinzer M; Nachtigall L; Flöel A
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():141-9. PubMed ID: 26851696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cathodal tDCS on the motor area decreases the tactile threshold of the distal pulp of the hallux.
    Yamamoto S; Ishii D; Ichiba N; Yozu A; Kohno Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Feb; 719():133887. PubMed ID: 30339919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous stimulation using rTMS and tDCS produces the most effective modulation of motor cortical excitability in healthy subjects: A pilot study.
    Wang H; Wang X; Jin J; Zhang W; Li Y; Liu Z; Yin T
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Feb; 694():46-50. PubMed ID: 30342993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polarity-independent effects of tDCS on paired associative stimulation-induced plasticity.
    Faber H; Opitz A; Müller-Dahlhaus F; Ziemann U
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(6):1061-1069. PubMed ID: 28822654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex.
    Wiethoff S; Hamada M; Rothwell JC
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 24630848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability.
    Ataoglu EE; Caglayan HB; Cengiz B
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 28577024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability.
    Kaneko F; Shibata E; Hayami T; Nagahata K; Aoyama T
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 13():36. PubMed ID: 27079199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach.
    Pellicciari MC; Brignani D; Miniussi C
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():569-80. PubMed ID: 23845429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Somatosensory and transcranial direct current stimulation effects on manual dexterity and motor cortex function: A metaplasticity study.
    Trudgen A; Cirillo J; Byblow WD
    Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(4):938-947. PubMed ID: 30850217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 25hours.
    Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr; 48(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 29248201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.