These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30157687)

  • 1. Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Migrated to Electronic Formats: A Review of Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Trials and Bring Your Own Device.
    Byrom B; Gwaltney C; Slagle A; Gnanasakthy A; Muehlhausen W
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2019 Jul; 53(4):426-430. PubMed ID: 30157687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.
    Coons SJ; Gwaltney CJ; Hays RD; Lundy JJ; Sloan JA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Cella D; Basch E;
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):419-29. PubMed ID: 19900250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Scale Types Collected Using Bring Your Own Device Compared to Paper and a Provisioned Device: Results of a Randomized Equivalence Trial.
    Byrom B; Doll H; Muehlhausen W; Flood E; Cassedy C; McDowell B; Sohn J; Hogan K; Belmont R; Skerritt B; McCarthy M
    Value Health; 2018 May; 21(5):581-589. PubMed ID: 29753356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standards for Instrument Migration When Implementing Paper Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments Electronically: Recommendations from a Qualitative Synthesis of Cognitive Interview and Usability Studies.
    Muehlhausen W; Byrom B; Skerritt B; McCarthy M; McDowell B; Sohn J
    Value Health; 2018 Jan; 21(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 29304939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Updated Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Comparability Among Modes of Data Collection for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force.
    O'Donohoe P; Reasner DS; Kovacs SM; Byrom B; Eremenco S; Barsdorf AI; Arnera V; Coons SJ
    Value Health; 2023 May; 26(5):623-633. PubMed ID: 37121630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Capturing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data Electronically: The Past, Present, and Promise of ePRO Measurement in Clinical Trials.
    Coons SJ; Eremenco S; Lundy JJ; O'Donohoe P; O'Gorman H; Malizia W
    Patient; 2015 Aug; 8(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 25300613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013.
    Muehlhausen W; Doll H; Quadri N; Fordham B; O'Donohoe P; Dogar N; Wild DJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Oct; 13():167. PubMed ID: 26446159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does scrolling affect measurement equivalence of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROM)? Results of a quantitative equivalence study.
    Shahraz S; Pham TP; Gibson M; De La Cruz M; Baara M; Karnik S; Dell C; Pease S; Nigam S; Cappelleri JC; Lipset C; Zornow P; Lee J; Byrom B
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2021 Feb; 5(1):23. PubMed ID: 33638726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Training on the Use of Technology to Collect Patient-Reported Outcome Data Electronically in Clinical Trials: Best Practice Recommendations from the ePRO Consortium.
    Ly JJ; Crescioni M; Eremenco S; Bodart S; Donoso M; Butler AJ; Dallabrida SM
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2019 Jul; 53(4):431-440. PubMed ID: 30221997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparability of a provisioned device versus bring your own device for completion of patient-reported outcome measures by participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: qualitative interview findings.
    Newton L; Knight-West O; Eremenco S; Hudgens S; Crescioni M; Symonds T; Reasner DS; Byrom B; O'Donohoe P; Vallow S; ;
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2022 Aug; 6(1):86. PubMed ID: 35925498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Bring Your Own Device" (BYOD): The Future of Field-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Clinical Trials?
    Gwaltney C; Coons SJ; O'Donohoe P; O'Gorman H; Denomey M; Howry C; Ross J
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2015 Nov; 49(6):783-791. PubMed ID: 30222388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electronic collection of patient-reported outcomes following discharge after surgery: systematic review.
    Tsang C; Lee KS; Richards H; Blazeby JM; Avery KNL
    BJS Open; 2021 Mar; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 33782708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures.
    Campbell N; Ali F; Finlay AY; Salek SS
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Aug; 24(8):1949-61. PubMed ID: 25702266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement Comparability of Electronic and Paper Administration of Visual Analogue Scales: A Review of Published Studies.
    Byrom B; Elash CA; Eremenco S; Bodart S; Muehlhausen W; Platko JV; Watson C; Howry C
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2022 May; 56(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 35142989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Best Practices for Avoiding Paper Backup When Implementing Electronic Approaches to Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Clinical Trials.
    Howry C; Elash CA; Crescioni M; Eremenco S; O'Donohoe P; Rothrock T
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2019 Jul; 53(4):441-445. PubMed ID: 30244593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: creation of an electronic version of a patient-reported outcome instrument by conversion from a pen-and-paper version and evaluation of their equivalence.
    Delgado-Herrera L; Banderas B; Ojo O; Kothari R; Zeiher B
    Patient Relat Outcome Meas; 2017; 8():83-95. PubMed ID: 28790875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PRO data collection in clinical trials using mixed modes: report of the ISPOR PRO mixed modes good research practices task force.
    Eremenco S; Coons SJ; Paty J; Coyne K; Bennett AV; McEntegart D;
    Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):501-16. PubMed ID: 25128043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of daily electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) diaries in randomized controlled trials for rheumatoid arthritis: rationale and implementation.
    Bingham CO; Gaich CL; DeLozier AM; Engstrom KD; Naegeli AN; de Bono S; Banerjee P; Taylor PC
    Trials; 2019 Mar; 20(1):182. PubMed ID: 30902094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Key methodological considerations for usability testing of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems.
    Aiyegbusi OL
    Qual Life Res; 2020 Feb; 29(2):325-333. PubMed ID: 31691202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of electronic systems to collect patient-reported outcome (PRO) data-recommendations for clinical trial teams: report of the ISPOR ePRO systems validation good research practices task force.
    Zbrozek A; Hebert J; Gogates G; Thorell R; Dell C; Molsen E; Craig G; Grice K; Kern S; Hines S
    Value Health; 2013 Jun; 16(4):480-9. PubMed ID: 23796281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.