200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30157805)
1. Comparison of pars plana with anterior chamber glaucoma drainage device implantation for glaucoma: a meta-analysis.
Wang B; Li W
BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):212. PubMed ID: 30157805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrospective review of pars plana versus anterior chamber placement of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device.
Rososinski A; Wechsler D; Grigg J
J Glaucoma; 2015 Feb; 24(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 23787335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes With Pars Plana Versus Anterior Chamber Glaucoma Drainage Devices.
Kang JJ; Rittterband DC; Lai K; Eisenberg RE; Liebmann JM; Seedor JA
Cornea; 2019 Nov; 38(11):1364-1369. PubMed ID: 31335528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pars Plana-Modified versus Conventional Ahmed Glaucoma Valve in Patients Undergoing Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Prospective Comparative Randomized Study.
Parihar JK; Jain VK; Kaushik J; Mishra A
Curr Eye Res; 2017 Mar; 42(3):436-442. PubMed ID: 27348314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Pars Plana Versus Anterior Chamber Placement of Glaucoma Implant Tubes.
Qin VL; Kaleem M; Conti FF; Rockwood EJ; Singh A; Sood-Mendiratta S; Sears JE; Silva FQ; Eisengart J; Singh RP
J Glaucoma; 2018 May; 27(5):440-444. PubMed ID: 29521717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma drainage device implantation.
Arroyave CP; Scott IU; Fantes FE; Feuer WJ; Murray TG
Ophthalmology; 2001 Nov; 108(11):1978-85. PubMed ID: 11713065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Penetrating keratoplasty with pars plana glaucoma drainage devices.
Ritterband DC; Shapiro D; Trubnik V; Marmor M; Meskin S; Seedor J; Liebmann JM; Tello C; Koplin R; Harizman N; Shabto U; Ritch R;
Cornea; 2007 Oct; 26(9):1060-6. PubMed ID: 17893534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Baerveldt surgery outcomes: anterior chamber insertion versus vitreous cavity insertion.
Tojo N; Hayashi A; Consolvo-Ueda T; Yanagisawa S
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 256(11):2191-2200. PubMed ID: 30171351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Efficacy and Complications of Cyclophotocoagulation and Second Glaucoma Drainage Device After Initial Glaucoma Drainage Device Failure.
Wang MY; Patel K; Blieden LS; Chuang AZ; Baker LA; Bell NP; Feldman RM
J Glaucoma; 2017 Nov; 26(11):1010-1018. PubMed ID: 28858156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison of Sequential Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation Versus Cyclophotocoagulation Following Failure of a Primary Drainage Device.
Levinson JD; Giangiacomo AL; Beck AD; Pruett PB; Superak HM; Lynn MJ; Costarides AP
J Glaucoma; 2017 Apr; 26(4):311-314. PubMed ID: 26859357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of Additional Glaucoma Drainage Device Insertion in Refractory Glaucoma: Case Series with a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lee NY; Hwang HB; Oh SH; Park CK
Semin Ophthalmol; 2015; 30(5-6):345-51. PubMed ID: 24646312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and surgical outcomes of glaucoma drainage device tube in ciliary sulcus versus anterior chamber in North Indian glaucoma patients.
Jha UP; Kumar S; Jindal V; Gupta G; Ichhpujani P
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 71(5):1960-1965. PubMed ID: 37203065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcomes of Ahmed Glaucoma valve in posterior segment versus anterior chamber.
Maris PJ; Tsai JC; Khatib N; Bansal R; Al-Aswad LA
J Glaucoma; 2013 Mar; 22(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 22914424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical management for postkeratoplasty glaucoma: a meta-analysis.
Tandon A; Espandar L; Cupp D; Ho S; Johnson V; Ayyala RS
J Glaucoma; 2014 Sep; 23(7):424-9. PubMed ID: 23221909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Valved Glaucoma Drainage Devices in Pediatric Glaucoma: Retrospective Long-term Outcomes.
Chen A; Yu F; Law SK; Giaconi JA; Coleman AL; Caprioli J
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 133(9):1030-5. PubMed ID: 26087019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of Anterior Chamber, Sulcus, and Pars Plana Glaucoma Drainage Device Placement in Glaucoma Patients.
Samuel S; Chang EK; Gupta S; Chachanidze M; Neeson CE; Miller JB; Chang TC; Solá-Del Valle DA
J Ophthalmol; 2022; 2022():5947992. PubMed ID: 35909463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grooved Glaucoma Drainage Devices That Continuously Deliver Cyclosporine A Decrease Postsurgical Scar Formation in Rabbit Eyes.
Dai Z; Yu X; Sun J; Sun X
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Mar; 58(3):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 28319643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical outcomes of inflammatory glaucoma: a comparison of trabeculectomy and glaucoma-drainage-device implantation.
Iverson SM; Bhardwaj N; Shi W; Sehi M; Greenfield DS; Budenz DL; Kishor K
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 59(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 25688057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation versus second glaucoma drainage device after prior aqueous tube shunt surgery.
Murakami Y; Akil H; Chahal J; Dustin L; Tan J; Chopra V; Francis B
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 45(3):241-246. PubMed ID: 27570215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combined vitrectomy and glaucoma drainage device implantation surgical approach for complex pediatric glaucomas.
Ozgonul C; Besirli CG; Bohnsack BL
J AAPOS; 2017 Apr; 21(2):121-126. PubMed ID: 28254440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
