These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30158036)

  • 1. Canine Retraction Using a Closed Nickel Titanium Coil Spring and an Elastic Module.
    Khalid Z; Bangash AA; Anwar A; Pasha H; Amin E
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 Sep; 28(9):695-698. PubMed ID: 30158036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.
    Yee JA; Türk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Cheng LL; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains.
    Bokas J; Woods M
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16792244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction.
    Abbas NH; Sabet NE; Hassan IT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 27021451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction.
    Al-Jundi A; Sabbagh BA; Baskaradoss JK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28174364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Canine and molar movement, rotation and tipping by NiTi coils versus elastomeric chains in first maxillary premolar extraction orthodontic adolescents: A randomized split-mouth study.
    Hashemzadeh H; Soleimani M; Golbar M; Dehghani Soltani A; Mirmalek SP
    Int Orthod; 2022 Mar; 20(1):100601. PubMed ID: 34866026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Friction versus frictionless mechanics during maxillary en-masse retraction in adult patients with Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a randomized clinical trial.
    Magdi S; Abdelsayed FA; Aboulfotouh MH; Fahim FH
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 39011819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics.
    Aboul-Ela SM; El-Beialy AR; El-Sayed KM; Selim EM; El-Mangoury NH; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 21300255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Leptin levels in gingival crevicular fluid during canine retraction: in vivo comparative study.
    Sar SK; Shetty D; Kumar P; Juneja S; Sharma P
    J Orthod; 2019 Mar; 46(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 31056072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
    Shpack N; Davidovitch M; Sarne O; Panayi N; Vardimon AD
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anchorage loss during canine retraction using intermittent versus continuous force distractions; a split mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Mowafy MI; Zaher AR
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 23021114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical study of Twin-wires on anchorage on canine retraction].
    Wang GH; Liu P; Ou YM
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Jun; 15(3):332-4. PubMed ID: 16862375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of elastic memory chains versus nickel-titanium coil springs in canine retraction: A two-center split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Khanemasjedi M; Moradinejad M; Javidi P; Niknam O; Jahromi NH; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):561-574. PubMed ID: 29153282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of single versus multiple piezocisions on the rate of canine retraction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Eid FY; El-Kalza AR
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):1024. PubMed ID: 39215274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Holographic analysis of the initial canine displacement produced by four different retraction springs.
    Kumar YM; Ravindran NS; Balasubramaniam MR
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):368-72. PubMed ID: 19216610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of anchorage loss during en-masse retraction with indirectly loaded miniscrews in patients with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Monga N; Kharbanda OP; Samrit V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):274-82. PubMed ID: 27476360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on the acceleration of tooth movement.
    Showkatbakhsh R; Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh M
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e52-6. PubMed ID: 21490989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.