These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30158068)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with coronary artery disease: Results from the MASS III trial.
    Scudeler TL; Hueb WA; Farkouh ME; Maron DJ; de Soárez PC; Campolina AG; Takiuti ME; Rezende PC; Godoy LC; Hueb AC; Lima EG; Garzillo CL; Ramires JAF; Kalil Filho R
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 273():63-68. PubMed ID: 30158068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery from a Dutch perspective.
    Osnabrugge RL; Magnuson EA; Serruys PW; Campos CM; Wang K; van Klaveren D; Farooq V; Abdallah MS; Li H; Vilain KA; Steyerberg EW; Morice MC; Dawkins KD; Mohr FW; Kappetein AP; Cohen DJ;
    Heart; 2015 Dec; 101(24):1980-8. PubMed ID: 26552756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of intraoperative conversion from off-pump to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on costs and quality of life: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Shiga T; Apfel CC; Wajima Z; Ohe Y
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Dec; 21(6):793-9. PubMed ID: 18068054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a multisite trial.
    Wagner TH; Hattler B; Bishawi M; Baltz JH; Collins JF; Quin JA; Grover FL; Shroyer AL;
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):770-7. PubMed ID: 23916805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cost implications of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery at one year.
    Lamy A; Tong W; Devereaux PJ; Gao P; Gafni A; Singh K; Taggart D; Straka Z; Akar AR; Piegas L; Ou Y; Yusuf S
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Nov; 98(5):1620-5. PubMed ID: 25261272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.
    Cohen DJ; Osnabrugge RL; Magnuson EA; Wang K; Li H; Chinnakondepalli K; Pinto D; Abdallah MS; Vilain KA; Morice MC; Dawkins KD; Kappetein AP; Mohr FW; Serruys PW;
    Circulation; 2014 Sep; 130(14):1146-57. PubMed ID: 25085960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. OPCAB surgery is cost-effective for elderly patients.
    Houlind K; Kjeldsen BJ; Madsen SN; Rasmussen BS; Holme SJ; Pallesen PA; Mortensen PE; Fenger-Grøn M; Beck SJ; Ehlers LH;
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2013 Jun; 47(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 23566075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing cost aspects of coronary artery bypass graft surgery with coronary artery stenting.
    Birim Ö; Bogers AJ; Kappetein AP
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2012 Oct; 53(5):641-50. PubMed ID: 22252542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Bypass Surgery for Patients With Left Main Disease: Results From the EXCEL Trial.
    Magnuson EA; Chinnakondepalli K; Vilain K; Serruys PW; Sabik JF; Kappetein AP; Stone GW; Cohen DJ;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jul; 15(7):e011981. PubMed ID: 35861797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention vs. surgery for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era.
    Ariyaratne TV; Yap CH; Ademi Z; Rosenfeldt F; Duffy SJ; Billah B; Reid CM
    Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2016 Oct; 2(4):261-270. PubMed ID: 29474722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The fate at mid-term follow-up of the on-pump vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.
    Nardi P; Pellegrino A; Bassano C; Mani R; Chiariello GA; Zeitani J; Chiariello L
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2015 Feb; 16(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 25022926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting plus mitral valve repair versus coronary artery bypass grafting alone for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation.
    Ferket BS; Thourani VH; Voisine P; Hohmann SF; Chang HL; Smith PK; Michler RE; Ailawadi G; Perrault LP; Miller MA; O'Sullivan K; Mick SL; Bagiella E; Acker MA; Moquete E; Hung JW; Overbey JR; Lala A; Iraola M; Gammie JS; Gelijns AC; O'Gara PT; Moskowitz AJ;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Jun; 159(6):2230-2240.e15. PubMed ID: 31375378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting.
    Lamy A; Devereaux PJ; Prabhakaran D; Taggart DP; Hu S; Straka Z; Piegas LS; Avezum A; Akar AR; Lanas Zanetti F; Jain AR; Noiseux N; Padmanabhan C; Bahamondes JC; Novick RJ; Tao L; Olavegogeascoechea PA; Airan B; Sulling TA; Whitlock RP; Ou Y; Gao P; Pettit S; Yusuf S;
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Dec; 375(24):2359-2368. PubMed ID: 27771985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coronary bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention: cost-effectiveness in Iran: a study in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
    Javanbakht M; Bakhsh RY; Mashayekhi A; Ghaderi H; Sadeghi M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Oct; 30(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 25401422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rationale and design of the coronary artery bypass grafting surgery off or on pump revascularization study: a large international randomized trial in cardiac surgery.
    Lamy A; Devereaux PJ; Prabhakaran D; Hu S; Piegas LS; Straka Z; Paolasso E; Taggart D; Lanas F; Akar AR; Jain A; Noiseux N; Ou Y; Chrolavicius S; Ng J; Yusuf S
    Am Heart J; 2012 Jan; 163(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22172429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary and Peripheral Artery Disease Antithrombotic Treatments in Finland.
    Soini E; Virtanen O; Väätäinen S; Briere JB; Bowrin K; Millier A
    Adv Ther; 2020 Jul; 37(7):3348-3369. PubMed ID: 32519113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increasing long-term major vascular events and resource consumption in patients receiving off-pump coronary artery bypass: a single-center prospective observational study.
    Hu S; Zheng Z; Yuan X; Wang W; Song Y; Sun H; Xu J
    Circulation; 2010 Apr; 121(16):1800-8. PubMed ID: 20385931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost effectiveness analysis of minimally invasive internal thoracic artery bypass versus percutaneous revascularisation for isolated lesions of the left anterior descending artery.
    Rao C; Aziz O; Panesar SS; Jones C; Morris S; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
    BMJ; 2007 Mar; 334(7594):621. PubMed ID: 17337457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial.
    Puskas JD; Williams WH; Mahoney EM; Huber PR; Block PC; Duke PG; Staples JR; Glas KE; Marshall JJ; Leimbach ME; McCall SA; Petersen RJ; Bailey DE; Weintraub WS; Guyton RA
    JAMA; 2004 Apr; 291(15):1841-9. PubMed ID: 15100202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Five years follow-up after Y-graft arterial revascularization: on pump versus off pump; prospective clinical trial.
    Ramadan AS; Stefanidis C; N'Gatchou W; El Oumeiri B; Jansens JL; De Smet JM; Antoine M; De Cannière D
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Mar; 10(3):423-7. PubMed ID: 19995794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.